Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter lx · Page 1 of about 37 results (0.067 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 01 2006

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-01-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2006

Asian Alloys Limited and Mr. Pawan Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-28-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(112)ECC383

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2009

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

1931 (16 of 1931), the force of law; vi. the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the excise specified under Clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional … (appellant) is engaged in the business of manufacturing motor vehicles falling under Chapter 87 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. These motor vehicles are cleared … (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003), paid on any inputs or capital goods received in the factory on or after the … price.21. Before concluding, it may be clarified that on account of repeated amendments in the CENVAT Credit Rules, huge litigation in the country stands generated. … 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 or 63 of the First Schedule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 28 2023

Union Of India Vs. Cosmo Films Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2018. 2 Paragraph 4.13 of FTP, read with the HBP. 3 Leviable under Section 3(7) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4 Leviable under Section 3(9) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 5 Paragraph 4.03 of FTP. … scheme except for inputs listed in Schedule 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act 2017 No 18 of 2017, with effect from July l, 2017. RAs are directed not to issue ARO … in existence under different paragraphs in different policy periods for years. Since 2003, all drug companies had been importing their raw materials sourced from unregistered … framed thereunder, the Director General of Foreign Trade (“DGFT”) notified the HBP, chapter 4 of which prescribed the procedure for availing duty exemption / remission

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2010

Shri Pradeep Khanna, M/S. Sound Tarrific and Another Vs. Cc (iandg), N ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2005

Raymond Limited Vs. Cce and C

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-10-2005

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2005)(101)ECC553

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2011

Ms Md Overseas Limited Vs. Director General of Income Tax and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-04-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 132(1) clauses (i) to (v), 127, 147; SEZ Act - Section 22; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Sub-Rule (2) of rule 112; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - section 132(1) or (1A). 165; RTI Act - Section 24; Evidence Act - Section 75, 123, 125; Constitution Of India - Article 21

Government of India; The business activities of the Petitioner are being regulated by the Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Regulations. They are maintained and monitored by the Reserve Bank of India. The import of precious metals go … services exported out of, or imported into, or procured from the domestic tariff area also exempt from payment of taxes, duties or cess under all … of the persons under search at Noida. The Petitioner has filed an amendment application challenging the same. 13. Essentially, the WP and the amendment application, … XIV-B. (v) A flat rate of tax at 60% was charged for the block period. Changes by Finance Act 2003 (vi) The aforesaid procedure was again changed by the Finance Act 2003. Now, the procedure for assessment in … public revenue and is a revenue officer. 62. Chapter XXII of the IT Act is titled as … may be seen and disclosed by the court. 60. Section 125 of the Evidence Act is titled

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2009

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-28-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Reported in : (2009)25VST41(Gauhati)

after considering the effect of inclusion and exclusion of items from the purview of specific entries in the Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff, laid down that 'it is well-settled, what is not excluded would be held to … potato wafers as preparations of vegetables and, therefore, as appropriately classifiable under Chapter 20 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The learned Counsel has … be covered by entry 80 of Part A of the Second Schedule to the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act') or the said product would fall under the residuary entry covered by … impugned order, has also drawn the attention of the court to the amendments made in respect of the said entry. In this regard, the learned … Additional Appellate Assistant Commissioner reported in : [1985] 60 STC 80 : [1985] 4 SCC 30, Sri

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2023

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

the product in question, known as “Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil”4 could not be classified as ‘medicament’ under Tariff Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the … the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff entries in Chapters 30 and 33 in the year … in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19855-6; and that the product in question, being “Hair oil”, was required … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9525 OF2018COMMISSSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, HYDERABAD …APPELLANT VERSUS ASHWANI HOMEO PHARMACY …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.Table of Contents … Naturence Research Labs (P) LTD. Vs. CCE, DELHI-II. 2003 (154) E.L.T. 672 (Tri.-.Del.) is not correct as … Cinchona Q02 ml iv) Piocarpine Q02 ml (Q= lX in pure coconut oil q.s. Alcohol 0.9°/o V/V)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant … will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED … J U D G M E N T RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. Aggrieved by the orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) holding that the coconut oil … Central Excise v. Essen Products (I) Ltd. 2006 (200) ELT342(T) etc. relied 60 upon by the Tribunal and the Board circular dated 31.08.1995 were dealing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial