Advanced Search Results

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

1931 (16 of 1931), the force of law; vi. the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the excise specified under Clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional … (appellant) is engaged in the business of manufacturing motor vehicles falling under Chapter 87 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. These motor vehicles are cleared … (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003), paid on any inputs or capital goods received in the factory on or after the … price.21. Before concluding, it may be clarified that on account of repeated amendments in the CENVAT Credit Rules, huge litigation in the country stands generated. … Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 ( 58 of 1957);v. the National Calamity Contingent duty leviable

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Union Of India Vs. Cosmo Films Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2018. 2 Paragraph 4.13 of FTP, read with the HBP. 3 Leviable under Section 3(7) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4 Leviable under Section 3(9) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 5 Paragraph 4.03 of FTP. … scheme except for inputs listed in Schedule 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act 2017 No 18 of 2017, with effect from July l, 2017. RAs are directed not to issue ARO … in existence under different paragraphs in different policy periods for years. Since 2003, all drug companies had been importing their raw materials sourced from unregistered … framed thereunder, the Director General of Foreign Trade (“DGFT”) notified the HBP, chapter 4 of which prescribed the procedure for availing duty exemption / remission

Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur Vs. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 3; ;Central Excise Rules - Rule 57A, 57A(1), 57AA, 57AB, 57AC, 57AC(1), 57AH, 57F, 57J and 173Q(1); ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 11A; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2004(96)ECC73; 2004(171)ELT289(SC); JT2004(7)SC152; 2004(3)SCALE6; (2004)7SCC344

of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (58 of 1957); and(v) the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, equivalent to the duty of excise specified under Clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above, paid … dismissed.2. The assessee carries on the business of manufacturing cement falling under Chapter 25 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The … been paid credit will be allowed. Pursuant to this Rule 57-J, notification was issued on 20.6.1986 which was amended from time to time. The relevant part of the notification is as follows:S. No.Description of InputsDescription of intermediate

Nitco Tiles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

shall be imposed on imports into India of subject goods falling under Chapter 69 of the first Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act produced … before the Deputy Commissioner that no anti dumping duty can be imposed in terms of Section 9A(1) the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 could be imposed on imports made by them from M/s.Nanhai, China, in view of the finding … dumping duty was leviable in respect of vitrified/porcelain tiles imported into India from M/s. Nanhai of China. The amendment was effective from 11-7-2003 i.e. from the date of issue of Notification No. 98/2003. On 6th March 2006 … from M/s. Nanhai and directed pre-deposit of 25% of duty of Rs. 58,28,761/- relating to imports from M/s. Al Khaleej Ceramics. The applicants complied with

Raymond Limited Vs. Cce and C

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2005)(101)ECC553

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the product in question, known as “Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil”4 could not be classified as ‘medicament’ under Tariff Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the … the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff entries in Chapters 30 and 33 in the year … in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19855-6; and that the product in question, being “Hair oil”, was required … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9525 OF2018COMMISSSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, HYDERABAD …APPELLANT VERSUS ASHWANI HOMEO PHARMACY …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.Table of Contents … Naturence Research Labs (P) LTD. Vs. CCE, DELHI-II. 2003 (154) E.L.T. 672 (Tri.-.Del.) is not correct as … the show-cause notice, the respondent asserted that the 58 twin tests for classification of the product as

Haryana Power Purchase Centre Vs. Sasan Power Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to familiarize themselves with the Electricity Act, 2003, the Income Tax Act 1961, the Companies Act, 1956, the Customs Act, the Foreign Exchange Management Act, IEGC, the regulations framed by regulatory commissions and all other related acts, … 21/2022- Customs which provides as under: “ S. Chapter or Description of Goods Standard Additional Condition No.Heading … as captive mines available, which the procurer intends to set up under tariff based bidding process (Case 2).” (5) The guidelines are binding on the … J.(1) The six appeals with which we are concerned have been filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’ for 1 CIVIL APPEAL No.11826 OF2018etc. brevity). The appeals are directed against the … in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of … did not have a control over the water 58 CIVIL APPEAL No.11826 OF2018etc. source from which water

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant … will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED … J U D G M E N T RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. Aggrieved by the orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) holding that the coconut oil … to the impugned goods does not merit acceptance since the classification of 58 the goods is determinate on the harmonious construction of headings, relative Chapter

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant … will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED … J U D G M E N T RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. Aggrieved by the orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) holding that the coconut oil … to the impugned goods does not merit acceptance since the classification of 58 the goods is determinate on the harmonious construction of headings, relative Chapter