Advanced Search Results

Vazir Polymers Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5A; Customs Act, 1962 ; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ; Customs and Central Excises Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 5A(1) and 5A(2)

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1338

the like goods imported into India and also the Additional Customs Duty (CVD - Countervailing Duty) under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 leviable on like goods imported into India. Such Additional Customs Duty is leviable at the rates … ... ...Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was inserted by the Customs & Central Excises Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 with effect from 1.7.1988.Sec.5A - Power to grant exemption from duty of excise.- If the Central Government … regenerated polymers out of scrap or waste of goods falling within various Chapters including Chapter 39 of the Central Excise Tariff. Ordinarily, the units permitted … Calcutta High Court in Sukhi India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India, 2003 (156) ELT 35 wherein the same notification i.e. notification No.48/2001 dated 10.10.2001 … or thewaste of goodsfalling withinChapters 39, 54,55, 56, 59, 64, 84, 85, 86, 87,90, 91, 92, 93,94,

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

1931 (16 of 1931), the force of law; vi. the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the excise specified under Clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional … (appellant) is engaged in the business of manufacturing motor vehicles falling under Chapter 87 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. These motor vehicles are cleared … (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003), paid on any inputs or capital goods received in the factory on or after the … price.21. Before concluding, it may be clarified that on account of repeated amendments in the CENVAT Credit Rules, huge litigation in the country stands generated. … 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 or 63 of the First

B.S.N.L. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth.of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

prospective. 11.6 During the pendency of the appeals, the Authority notified Telecommunication Tariff (forty fourth amendment) Order, 2007 on 24.1.2007 fixing maximum permissible charges for … of Section 11 and sub-clause (ii) of Clause (b) of sub-section (l) of Section 11 of the TRAI (Amendment) Act of 2000?.3. Whether Authority has no power to fix terms and conditions of interconnectivity between service providers in … be used for framing regulation on that topic. Learned senior counsel referred to Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003, which, according to him, is pari materia to Section 11(2) and argued that in view of paragraph 15 … Act (except the power to settle dispute under Chapter IV and to make regulation under section36) as … regard under Section 178 of the 2003 Act?.” 59. The Constitution Bench extensively referred to the provisions … attention and providing the widest permissible range of services to meet the customers’ demand and at the same time at a reasonable price; (iv) creating

Union Of India Vs. Cosmo Films Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2018. 2 Paragraph 4.13 of FTP, read with the HBP. 3 Leviable under Section 3(7) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4 Leviable under Section 3(9) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 5 Paragraph 4.03 of FTP. … scheme except for inputs listed in Schedule 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act 2017 No 18 of 2017, with effect from July l, 2017. RAs are directed not to issue ARO … in existence under different paragraphs in different policy periods for years. Since 2003, all drug companies had been importing their raw materials sourced from unregistered … framed thereunder, the Director General of Foreign Trade (“DGFT”) notified the HBP, chapter 4 of which prescribed the procedure for availing duty exemption / remission

Nitco Tiles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

shall be imposed on imports into India of subject goods falling under Chapter 69 of the first Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act produced … before the Deputy Commissioner that no anti dumping duty can be imposed in terms of Section 9A(1) the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 could be imposed on imports made by them from M/s.Nanhai, China, in view of the finding … dumping duty was leviable in respect of vitrified/porcelain tiles imported into India from M/s. Nanhai of China. The amendment was effective from 11-7-2003 i.e. from the date of issue of Notification No. 98/2003. On 6th March 2006

initiating Explosives Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)9STR509

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Haryana Power Purchase Centre Vs. Sasan Power Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to familiarize themselves with the Electricity Act, 2003, the Income Tax Act 1961, the Companies Act, 1956, the Customs Act, the Foreign Exchange Management Act, IEGC, the regulations framed by regulatory commissions and all other related acts, … 21/2022- Customs which provides as under: “ S. Chapter or Description of Goods Standard Additional Condition No.Heading … as captive mines available, which the procurer intends to set up under tariff based bidding process (Case 2).” (5) The guidelines are binding on the … J.(1) The six appeals with which we are concerned have been filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’ for 1 CIVIL APPEAL No.11826 OF2018etc. brevity). The appeals are directed against the … in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of … (2 Pipe Lines each of 12 Kms) to 59.5 km (2 Pipe Lines each of 8 km

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant … will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED … In the present case, when item description is read with the Chapter 59 Notes, Section Notes and the tests for classification that is Tariff Item … J U D G M E N T RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. Aggrieved by the orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) holding that the coconut oil

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant … will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED … In the present case, when item description is read with the Chapter 59 Notes, Section Notes and the tests for classification that is Tariff Item … J U D G M E N T RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. Aggrieved by the orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) holding that the coconut oil

Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. Vs. Metrophones Telecommunica ...

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

these regulations as the Compensation Order and the 2003 Payphone Order, respectively. See Appendix A, infra, for … may be liable under the provisions of this chapter.” 47 U. S. C. §207 (emphasis added). This … violations of substantive regulations promulgated by the FCC; that §§201(a) and (b) concern only practices that harm carrier customers, not carrier suppliers; that the FCC’s “unreasonable practice” determination is unlawful because it is inadequately reasoned; and that … of competition, creating a system that relies in part upon competition and in part upon the role of tariffs in regulatory supervision, it left §201(b) in place. In light of the absence of any congressional prohibition, and … Commission, however, totally abandoned traditional regulatory requirements. And the new statutes and amendments left many traditional requirements and related statutory provisions, including §§201(b) and 207, … Argued October 10, 2006-Decided April 17, 2007 Under authority of the Communications Act of 1934, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates interstate telephone communications using … practices unreasonable); MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. FCC , 59 F. 3d 1407, 1414 (CADC 1995) (violation of