Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter ii · Page 1 of about 259 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 15 2010

C.C.E.C and St, Vishakhapatnam. Vs. Jocil Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2010

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962. - Section 28; Constitution Of India - Article 136

Six-digit First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted by the Eight-digit First Schedule vide the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Ordinance, 2003 and this substitution w.e.f. 01.02.2003 has statutory force. Therefore, the new Schedule would operate over and … nothing but triglycerides. According to the Central Revenue Chemical Laboratory (CRCL) opinion which was relied upon by CESTAT, Chapter 15.11 covers palm oil and its fractions - this view is also espoused in the HSN Explanatory Notes. … & Ors v. The Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Visakhapatnam - II.4. The CESTAT, in determining the appeal, took note of the fact that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2004

Firma Chemiczna Dwory S.A. Vs. Ministry of Finance, Designated

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2004

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2004)(93)ECC432

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2004

Vazir Polymers Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-06-2004

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5A; Customs Act, 1962 ; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ; Customs and Central Excises Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 5A(1) and 5A(2)

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1338

the like goods imported into India and also the Additional Customs Duty (CVD - Countervailing Duty) under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 leviable on like goods imported into India. Such Additional Customs Duty is leviable at the rates … ... ...Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was inserted by the Customs & Central Excises Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 with effect from 1.7.1988.Sec.5A - Power to grant exemption from duty of excise.- If the Central Government … regenerated polymers out of scrap or waste of goods falling within various Chapters including Chapter 39 of the Central Excise Tariff. Ordinarily, the units permitted … Calcutta High Court in Sukhi India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India, 2003 (156) ELT 35 wherein the same notification i.e. notification No.48/2001 dated 10.10.2001

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 08 2014

Hindal Co Industries Limited Vs. The Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-08-2014

Subject : Excise

3 SCC 620. This was a case of levy of additional customs duty under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. This duty is leviable in addition to the customs duty under Section 12 of the Customs … Petitioner is engaged in the manufacturing of aluminum sheets, foils falling under Chapter sub -heading 76071190 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The major … in : 1995 (77) E. L. T 268 (SC) are nullified with the change in law. With the amendment in section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the produce aluminium dross and skimming are deemed to … of Union of India vs. Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. reported in : 2003 (158) E. L. T 3 (SC), took the same view. Mr. Sridharan … waive service. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2004

Gem Granites Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-23-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HHB(2), 80HHC and 80HHC(2); Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 89A and 89A(4); Finance (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : (2004)192CTR(SC)481; [2004]271ITR322(SC); 2004(9)SCALE647; (2005)1SCC289

Straw/board . v. Commissioner of Income-tax : [1992]196ITR188(SC) . Reliance has also been placed on Chapters in the Customs Tariff Act as well as Central Excise Tariff Act in which a distinction has been drawn between minerals per … Commissioner of Income-tax : [1992]196ITR188(SC) . Reliance has also been placed on Chapters in the Customs Tariff Act as well as Central Excise Tariff Act … Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HHB(2), 80HHC, 80HHC(2) - Finance Act, 1982 - Section 89A, 89A(4) - Finance (Amendment) Act, 1991 - Deduction in respect of profits retained for export business - Entitlement to - Appellant exporter of … accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs.Civil Appeal No. 3962 of 200321. In this case, the High Court has clearly proceeded on a mis-reading … question would lie in the interpretation of Sub-section 2(b) of Section 80-HHB as it stood prior to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2014

Indian Hotels and Restaurant Association Represented by Its Treasurer ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-08-2014

Subject : Service Tax

which have been extensively referred in the Petition, reveals that the Parliament may have by the Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003 inserted Entry-92C in List-I relating to œTaxes on services? from the date to be notified. However, no such … the Central Government by the Finance Act, 2011 made an amendment to Chapter V of the Finance Act 1994, relating to service tax, inserting sub-clause … clause 105 of Section 65 of the Finance Act, when the declared tariff for providing of such accommodation is less than Rs. 1,000/per day from … exclusively fall under Entry 54 of the List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of … food served in restaurants could not be levied on the sum total of the price charged to the customer. The, restaurants provide services in addition to food, and these had to be accounted for. Thus, restaurants provided

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2012

Eco Valley Farms and Foods Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-14-2012

Subject : Excise

allowed without demanding excise duty equivalent to customs duty payable on imported mushrooms. 10. By the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act 2004 ('2004 Act'), the six digit entries in the Schedule to the 1985 Act were rearranged into eight … Development Commissioner, by availing exemption under Exemption Notification No.13/81-cus dated 9th February 1981 / 53/03-cus dated 31st March 2003 or 53/97-cus dated 3rd June 1997, as the case may be. Alternatively, the assessee could procure indigenous capital … to 30th November 1999 on the ground that fresh mushrooms classifiable under Chapter 7 heading No.0701.00 were liable to pay Nil rate of duty under … contrary to the decision of the Commissioner of Central Excise (A) ? 2. The appeal is admitted on the above question and taken up for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2006

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-01-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2023

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

the product in question, known as “Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil”4 could not be classified as ‘medicament’ under Tariff Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the … the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff entries in Chapters 30 and 33 in the year … in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19855-6; and that the product in question, being “Hair oil”, was required … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9525 OF2018COMMISSSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, HYDERABAD …APPELLANT VERSUS ASHWANI HOMEO PHARMACY …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.Table of Contents … Naturence Research Labs (P) LTD. Vs. CCE, DELHI-II. 2003 (154) E.L.T. 672 (Tri.-.Del.) is not correct as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2004

Hewlett Packard India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-2004

Subject : Service Tax

and declared the assessable value as US $ 775.02 under sub-Heading 84713010 of the first Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act; that since Microsoft disc, they separately indicated the software and declared its assessable value as US $ … of Sprint R.P. G India Ltd. v. CC (116) ELT 6 (SC). He, further mentioned that before its amendment, Note 6 to Chapter 85 referred to the "apparatus" for which the media was intended; that even after

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial