Advanced Search Results
Haryana Ship-breakers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Gujarat
Feb-06-1995
Customs
1997(96)ELT541(Guj); (1996)1GLR623
leviable on the vessels for breaking up as provided under Chapter 89, Heading 89.08 and sub-heading 8908.00 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The duty is leviable at 40 per cent ad valorem plus Rs. 1,400/- per Light Displacement Tonnage (L.D.T.). … has come into effect from March 1, 1994. 6A. The relevant provisions of law may be stated. Entry 83 of List I - Union List in Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India reads as follows :
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Appraiser, Appraising Department (Group Ii), Madras Customs, Custo ...
Chennai
Jan-28-1988
Customs
1988(17)ECC119
do, hereby exempts the goods specified in column (3) of the table annexed hereto and falling within the Chapter of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), specified in the corresponding entry … newsprint and writing and printing paper. The respondent registered a contract as per heading No. 84.66 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and Project Imports (Registration of Contracts) Regulations, 1965 with the Custom House, Madras, for clearance of the goods
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Ltd., Madras Vs. Appraiser, Madras Cus ...
Chennai
Sep-07-1987
Customs
Central Excise Act; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14, 25 and 25(1)
1988(15)ECC6; 1988(33)ELT22(Mad)
do, hereby exempts the goods specified in Column (3) of the Table annexed hereto and falling within the Chapter of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) specified in the corresponding entry … hereto and falling under Heading No. or sub-heading No. of Heading No. of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), specified in the corresponding entry in the Column (2) of the said Table, when imported
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Limited Vs. the Appraiser, Appraising ...
Chennai
Sep-07-1987
Customs
1988(14)LC548(Madras)
do, hereby exempts the goods specified in column (3) of the Table annexed hereto and falling within the Chapter of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) specified in the Corresponding entry … and falling under Heading No. or sub-heading No. , of Heading No. of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said table, when imported into … affidavits filed in support thereof the order of the High Court, dt 831983 & 1141983 respectively and made herein, and upon hearing the arguments of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs Vs. Jan De Nul N.V.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-11-2003
Miscellaneous
(2003)LC871Tri(Chennai)
necessary to examine the salient features to be noted for the purpose of classification of goods under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The First Schedule to the Tariff comprises of the general rules of interpretation of this Schedule which are … the items are in the nature of consumables and not to be considered as parts of dredger under Chapter 8905 by virtue of Section Note 2(b) of Section XVII of Customs Tariff Act. Respondents have not contested
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Bayerische Motoren Werke
Authority for Advance Rulings
Oct-28-2005
Land Acquisition
(2006)(193)ELT138AAR
said Table read with the relevant List appended hereto, as the case may be, and falling within the Chapter, heading or sub-heading of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) as are … Gerhard Lindner and Peter Baumgartner, Advs.Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(9), 2(26), 2(28), 2(42), 25(1), 28J and 28H; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 3; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Evidence Act - Section 114; General Rules - Rule 2; Interpretative
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEngee Industrial Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Karnataka
May-26-2003
Customs
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975
2002LC531(Karnataka); 2004(164)ELT242(Kar)
Notification No. 74/93-Cus., dated 28-2-1993, all goods falling under the Heading 8908 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, when imported into India are exempted from so much of the duty of customs leviable thereon as is … No. 07 dated 3-8-1993 relating to the import of the said vessel claiming classification of the vessel under Chapter 89.08.00 of the Act read with Notification No. 74/93, dated 28-2-1993. The basic duty has been indicated in … 44.02, 44.03, 44.04, 44.05, 46.01, 51.05, 62,92, 69.01, 69.02, 69.03, 69.04, 69.05, 83.01, 83.15, 95.01, 95.01, 95.02, 95.03, 95.05, 95.06, 95.07 and 95.08.'12. Chapter 89
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEspi Industrial Corporation Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-30-1986
Land Acquisition
(1987)(10)LC443Tri(Mum.)bai
84 Policy to show that there was no distinction between, motor vehicles and tractors. Besides, he argued that Chapter 83 of the Customs Tariff covered tractors and motor vehicles alike. In view of the submissions made by him … tractors in knocked down condition. This Rule of interpretation came into existence only with the enactment of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. It was not available at the time when the Honourable Supreme Court decided the case of Tarachand Gupta
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and Anr. Vs. Raj's Continental Exports Private Limited
Chennai
Jun-28-1985
Customs
Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Constitution of India - Article 226
1991(31)ECC369; 1987(27)ELT256(Mad)
were presented to the Assistant Collector of Customs. The respondent classified the goods under Heading 73.31 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. But the Assessing Authorities expressed the view that on an earlier occasion the Appellate Collector of Customs has … Customs Authorities is vitiated for the reason that it does not specify under which particulars of sub-items of chapter 83, the goods can be classified. Item 83.01/15(2) general, consists of three sub-items and each sub-item consists of various
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Customs, Bangalore and anr. Vs. Maestro Motors Ltd. and a ...
Supreme Court of India
Dec-07-2004
CustomsCivil
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Secton 3; Interpretative Rules - Rule 2
2004(97)ECC633; 2004(174)ELT289(SC); JT2005(11)SC289; 2004(10)SCALE253; (2005)9SCC412
necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts components and parts of motor vehicles, falling within Chapter 87 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) and goods specified in … :-(a) So much of the duty of customs which is leviable thereon under the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), as is in excess of the amount calculated at the rate of 25% ad-veloram; and(b)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »