Advanced Search Results
Harsh International and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Aug-01-2007
Land Acquisition
(2007)(122)ECC193
the review on 23^rd May 2003 and recommended provisional assessment of all exports of Vitrified/porcelain Tiles falling under chapter 69 of Gazette schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 made by M/s. Nanhai Shagyuan Oulin Construction Co. … and hence provisional assessments made in the present case are non est in law. Section 9A(8) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as amended by Section 89 of the Finance Act, 2000 reads as follows: (8) The provisions of the … in the present case.)and issued final findings vide Notification No. 15/2/03-DGAD dated 30.6.04. The relevant portion from the final findings is as under: (i) The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai
Supreme Court of India
Mar-19-2007
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 130E; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Interpretation Rules - Rule 3
2007(210)ELT180(SC); 2007(4)SCALE627; (2007)10SCC474
as to costs. Customs - Classification - Fully Automated Sequential Xray Spectrometer - CTA, 1975: S.H. 9022.19, 9027.30 -Chapter 30 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Whether Fully Automated Sequential Xray Spectrometer is an apparatus based on the … analysis. 3. To decide the above question, we quote hereinbelow the following Heading of Chapter 90 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 which reads as under:CHAPTER 90OPTICAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC, MEASURING, CHECKING, PRECISION, MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INSTRUMENT AND APPARATUS; PARTS AND
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEngee Industrial Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Karnataka
May-26-2003
Customs
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975
2002LC531(Karnataka); 2004(164)ELT242(Kar)
Notification No. 74/93-Cus., dated 28-2-1993, all goods falling under the Heading 8908 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, when imported into India are exempted from so much of the duty of customs leviable thereon as is … No. 07 dated 3-8-1993 relating to the import of the said vessel claiming classification of the vessel under Chapter 89.08.00 of the Act read with Notification No. 74/93, dated 28-2-1993. The basic duty has been indicated in … within Chapters 14, 71, 89 and 92.2.All goods falling under Heading Nos. 30.01, 32.03, 33.01, 33.03, 36.02, 44.01, 44.02, 44.03, 44.04, 44.05, 46.01, 51.05, 62,92,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chief Financial Controller, Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-31-1991
Land Acquisition
(1992)(38)ECC37
be classifiable as copper tubes under heading 74.07/08 or as parts of condensors/turbines under heading 84.04/05 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.5. The two headings of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 which have to be considered are reproduced below: Heading … the scope of heading 74.07: (c) Tubes, pipes and hollow bars made into identifiable articles falling within other chapter e.g. machinery parts (Section XVI), 7. We find that Explanatory Notes to the B.T.N. which can at best
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPatel Aluminium Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Another
Mumbai
Jun-29-1987
Excise
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(2); Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Central Excise Act
1988(36)ELT73(Bom)
tonnes of ingots and 16,955 tonnes of rods) falling within Chapter 76 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) and imported by the Metals and Minerals Trading Corporation of India Ltd. from the whole … that the said exemption notification dated 18th of April 1980 should be continued to remain in force upto 30th of September 1980. This is on the footing that the petitioners had already placed orders for import of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPatel Aluminium Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Jul-02-1991
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12(2), 25 and 25(1) and (2); Customs Tariff Act, 1975
1991(56)ELT298(Bom)
tonnes of ingots and 16,955 tonnes of rods) falling within Chapter 76 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) and imported by the Metals and Minerals Trading Corporation of India Ltd. from the whole … of the basic customs duty and additional duty leviable thereon. This notification was to remain in force upto 30th September 1980. On 29th August 1980 the Central Government issued another notification under Section 25(1) in relation to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPatel Aluminium Private Limited and Mohanbhai Ishwarbhai Patel Vs. Uni ...
Mumbai
Jun-29-1987
Customs
1988(14)LC634(Bombay)
tonnes of ingots and 16,955 tonnes of rods falling within Chapter 76 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) and imported by the Metals and Minerals Trading Corporation of India Ltd. from the whole … that the said exemption notification dated 18th of April, 1980 should be continued to remain in force upto 30th of September, 198o! This is on the footing that the petitioners had already placed orders for import of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Customs Vs. Sun Export Corporation
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-11-1989
Excise
(1989)(22)ECC329
imported the consignments of Vitamin AD-3 (Feed Grade) which were assessed to duty under heading 29.01/45(17) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with item 68 of C.E.T. Subsequent to payment of duty the importers filed a refund claim with … including antibiotics, hor- mones, sulpha drugs, Vitamins and other products specified in Notes 1 and 2 to this Chapter: (3) The following alcohols, namely isopropyl al- 100% cohol, methyl alcohol, propyl alcohol. (4) The following hydrocarbons, namely, … directed against the order-in-appeal bearing No. S/49-1630/84CL, S/49-181/85CL, S/49-182/85-CL and S/49-154/85CL dated 30.9.1985 passed by the Collector of Customs, (Appeals), Bombay.Appeal No. C.1474/86 arises out
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.
Mumbai
Apr-01-1992
Customs
1992(3)BomCR416; 1993LC654(Bombay)
pattern equipment to customs duty and countervailing duty under Tariff Entry 76.08/16 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The respondents also assessed countervailing duty on this import by applying the rates under Item 27 of the … are protect Areas tive(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)76.08/16 Other articles 60% - -of aluminumThis entry forms part of Chapter 76 in Section XV. Chapter 76 deals with aluminum and articles thereof.6. Entries 84.56 and 84.60 form part … and one set of pattern equipment can be used for making around 30,000 to 50,000 sand moulds. In the month of January 1978 the petitioners
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Sevantilal and Sons and Another Vs. The Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Jan-30-2015
Service Tax
from the whole of duty of Customs leviable thereon which is specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and from the whole of Additional Duty, Safeguard Duty and Anti-dumping Duty leviable thereon, respectively, under section 3, … are imported against an authorization or transferability on or after 18th April, 2013 by the Regional Authority. 6. Chapter 4 of the Foreign Trade Policy and Handbook of Procedures, 2009-14 (17th Edition 2012) contains provisions of Duty … April, 2013, exemption from Anti-dumping and Safeguard Duty will not be available. 30. The Petitioners also point out the amendments which have been made in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »