Advanced Search Results

Lathia Rubber Mfg. Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1999)(106)ELT278TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Engee Industrial Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 2002LC531(Karnataka); 2004(164)ELT242(Kar)

Notification No. 74/93-Cus., dated 28-2-1993, all goods falling under the Heading 8908 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, when imported into India are exempted from so much of the duty of customs leviable thereon as is … No. 07 dated 3-8-1993 relating to the import of the said vessel claiming classification of the vessel under Chapter 89.08.00 of the Act read with Notification No. 74/93, dated 28-2-1993. The basic duty has been indicated in

Mitra Prakashan Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)LC360Tri(Delhi)

of the Table annexed thereto and falling within the Chapter or Chapters of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 specified in the corresponding entry in Col. No. 2 of the said Table when imported into India. In … impugned order passed by the Colllector of Customs, Air Cargo Complex, Bombay denying the benefit of Notification No. 311/86 dated 13-5-1986.2. A few facts necessary for the purpose of this appeal are that the appellants imported a

Union of India Vs. M/S g.s. Chatha Rice Mills

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

14 February 2019. On 16 February 2019, the Union Government issued a notification under Section 8A of the Customs Tariff Act 1975. The notification introduced a tariff entry by which all goods originating in or exported from the Islamic Republic … Section 8A of the Customs Tariff Act 1975.3 By this notification, a new tariff entry was introduced in Chapter 98 of Section XXI in the following terms: (1) “9806 00 00 (2) All goods originating in or

Compack Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1) 56A, 57A and 57G

Reported in : AIR2006SC141; 2005(103)ECC1; 2005(189)ELT3(SC); JT2005(12)SC435; 2005(8)SCALE435; (2005)8SCC300

to the condition that the appropriate duty of excise or additional duty leviable under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), as the case may be, has already been paid in respect of the base paper … cardboard containers. It is a Small Scale Industry. It opted for the benefit contained in Section AA of Chapter V of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 so as to avail the MODVAT credit of the specified duties

Hanon Automotive Systems India Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

Chapter Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), as specified in the First Schedule including the Section and to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 Chapter Notes and the General (51 of 1975). Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may … Commissioner (CT) / Deputy Commissioner (ST)-II, Large Taxpayers Unit, Tamil Nadu, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, Nandanam, Chennai - 35. ... Respondent in all W.PsPrayer in W.P.No.15649 of 2024: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

Collector of Customs, Bombay Vs. Bhor Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 130E

Reported in : AIR1988SC1351; 1988(17)ECC46; 1988(19)LC455(SC); 1988(35)ELT346(SC); JT1988(4)SC726; 1988(1)SCALE907; 1988Supp(1)SCC418; [1988]3SCR641; [1988]Supp(3)SCR641; [1988]70STC42(

per 7.0. 046m should be considered as polymeric plasticizer. The Appellate Collector found that Chapter 38 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was residuary in nature. According to him, if the item was not covered by any other chapter of … liquid and as per 7.0. 046m should be considered as polymeric plasticizer. The Appellate Collector found that Chapter 38 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was residuary in nature. According to him, if the item was not

Vikram Cement Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 4; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32; Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Mining Act; Factories Act; Cenvat Credit Rules, 2000 - Rules 52A, 49(1) and 173G(1); Cenvat Credit (Amendment) Rules, 2001 - Rules 2 and 57AA; Cenvat Credit (Amendment) Rules, 2002 - Rule 2; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A, 57A(4), 57B, 57B(1), 57AA, 57AB, 57AC, 57G, 57J, 57Q, 57Q(1), 57R, 57S, 57S(7), 57T and 57T(5); Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995 - Rule 12; Central Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2001 - Rule 4(3); Central Excise (Amendment) Rules,

Reported in : 2005(102)ECC121; 2005(187)ELT145(SC); JT2005(7)SC637; (2005)7SCC74

purpose of allowing credit of any duty of excise or the additional duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), as may be specified in the said notification (hereafter, in this section, referred to as … to the earlier Modvat scheme.3. The assessees are engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinker falling under chapter 25 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They use explosives, welding electrodes, lubricating oil and crusher for extraction

Kamaraj Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 25 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(6) and 25; Central Excise Act, 1944; Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20(2); Finance Act, 1978; Income Tax Act; Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 44; Constitution of India; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1)

Reported in : 1983LC1462D(Kerala); 1983(14)ELT1751(Ker)

1962), exempted Viscose staple fibre and Viscose tow, falling within Chapter 56 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), when , imported into India from so much of the duty of customs leviable thereon … of 26-8-1982, 13-12-1982 and 1-3-1983 the figures and words 10% ad valorem was substituted by 20% ad valorem, 30% ad valorem and 40% ad valorem respectively. There is exemption of customs duty on the same lines in

Dass Colour Lab Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1993(42)ECC243

definition to the word 'Industrial plant' occurring in tariff Heading No. 98.01 in the First Schedule to The Customs Tariff Act, 1975, The Customs authorities refused to assess the duty under the heading and held that duty should be paid … the main features of the new first schedule are as follows:(i) The Harmonized System of nomenclature comprising 97 Chapters along with its general interpretative rules, Section Notes, Chapter Notes and sub-heading Notes has been totally adopted;(ii) The … in the Project Imports Regulations, 1986 which came into force on April 3,1986. In three of the writ petitions which were filed in 1986 long