Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs act 1962 section 96 · Page 1 of about 1,298 results (0.045 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 28 2003

Namaste Exports Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Nov-28-2003

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2004)(91)ECC225

9.4.96 under DEEC Scheme.He also imposed penalty of Rs. 2,85,936 on M/s NEL under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. For the goods cleared through Chennai Seaport, the Commissioner of Customs (Seaport) under his Order No.82/99 dtd. 17.11.99

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2005

Bee International and Shri A. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-27-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(101)ECC649

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1969

Superintendent Customs and Central Excise Vapi Vs. Raichand Lakhmansin ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-28-1969

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 550

Reported in : AIR1970Guj223; 1970CriLJ1446; (1970)0GLR919

such vehicle when smuggled goods are being transported in exercise of his powers under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 (which will be hereinafter referred to as the Act). He has powers to seize them if there is … in Japan and he prepared the seizure list Ex. A/10. The seizure was stated to be made under Section 96 (?) Cr. P.C. Ext A/10 shows that the seizure was only of the pencils but it now turns

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 21 2005

J.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-21-2005

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 8C, 9 and 9A to 9C; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1982; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 15, 46, 58, 68, 72 and 129; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 8B, 8C, 8(8) and 15(1); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 9AA; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148; Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5 to 17, 18, 19 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 226, 227, 229 and 265

Reported in : 2005(103)ECC152; 2005(186)ELT3(Raj)

duties in terms of Entry 81 of the List I of schedule VII of the Constitution is the Customs Act, 1962. Section 12 of Customs Act provides that the duties of custom shall be levied at the rate prescribed under … part of the produce of our own industry, employed in a way in which we have some advantage. 96. Thus, a specialised Bench of Tribunal well equipped with the legal acumen and technical expertise of the experienced

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1997

The Collector of Customs (Preventive) and Two ors. Vs. Sri Biplab Raks ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-08-1997

Subject : Customs

The appellants failed to make out a case.10. In the result, the appeal fails and is dismissed. The Customs Act, 1962, Section 110(2)--Seizure of valuable article--Show--cause notice--period of limitation--right to release of the goods accrues after limitation.Certain goods were seized

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2006

Tisco Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(112)ECC15

stated in the said Adjudication Order, they were liable to confiscation under Section 111(m) and (d) of the Customs Act, 1962(at page 601 of Appellant's Paper Book-Volume II). The Commissioner further held that, however, since the goods were not … were for sale by SN to TISCO was 14045 tonnes of equipments and materials, a shortfall of about 9600 Metric Tonnes approximately (at p.254 oft Paper Book). However, conveniently this has been ignored by the Commissioner in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1999

Vikram Ispat and ors. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-22-1999

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2000)(88)LC327Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2008

Commissioner of Customs, Calcutta Vs. Indian Rayon and Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-16-2008

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35L; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 20; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 12(1), 13, 14 and 14A

Reported in : 2008(121)ECC1; 2008(157)LC1(SC); JT2008(8)SC426; 2008(10)SCALE498; 2008AIRSCW5954.

being aggrieved has filed the present appeal.9. Counsel for the parties have been heard.10. Section 20 of the Customs Act, 1962, which deals with re-importation of the goods, provides:20. Re-importation of goods. - If goods were imported into India

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 1999

Parekh Marine Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees fo ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-20-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226;; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 60, 61, 62 and 111;; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 48, 49, 53, 54 and 56;; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Section 35

Reported in : (1999)3CALLT401(HC),2001(73)ECC464

be a permission from the Customs Authorities for sale of such goods. Sections 48 and 49 of the Customs Act. 1962 provides that if any goodsbrought into India from a place outside India are not cleared for home consumption … the respondent Port authorities have under the obligaion to sell the same in accordance with the provision of section 62 of the Major Port Trust Act. 1963. They are not entitlled to claim any demurrage from the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2003

Gujarat Methodist Church Cardiothoracic and Vascular Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-16-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Bombay Public Trust Act; Societies Registration Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25, 28(1) and 111; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3

Reported in : (2004)1GLR270

show cause why the customs duty of Rs. 66,26,949/should not be demanded and confirmed under Section 28(1)of the Customs Act, 1962, and the equipment in question not be confiscated under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, on the ground

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial