Advanced Search Results

Gopal Saran Vs. Collector of Customs and Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1987)(12)LC838Tri(Delhi)

to 601/86-NRB, dated 13-11-1986 passed by this Tribunal. "(1) In view of the above statutory provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 and Defence of India Rules, 1962, when a person has been charged and punished for abetment separately under … When there is no evidence for abetment in the offence so as to warrant imposition of penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, how the imposition of penalty under Rule 126L-16 of Defence of India … found guilty under Section 135(1)(b)(ii) of the Customs Act and under Section 85(ii) of the Gold Control Act. However, the trial Court imposed the penalty

Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Preventive Vs. V.O.S. Ansari

Court : Chennai

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111, 112, 123 and 135(1); Gold Control Act, 1968 - Sections 85 and 85(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 378(2) and 397(1)

Reported in : 1980CENCUS151D; 1982(10)ELT69(Mad)

of 1976 rendered on 23-8-1977 finding the accused guilty of an offence under Section 135(l)(b) (in of the Customs Act, 1962 and an offence under Section 85(ii) of the Gold Control Act, 1968 but failing to award any sentence

Ripen Kumar Vs. Department of Customs

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 244; The Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1); Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 85

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1288; 2000(72)ECC722

giving rise to the above questions are, that on 28th October,1987 a complaint under Section 135(1)(b) of the Customs Act,1962 and Section 85 of the Gold (Control) Act,1968 was filed against the present petitioner in the court of

Linder Frank Wolfgang Vs. Yogesh D. Shah and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 85(1), 86 and 135(1)

Reported in : 2001VIIAD(SC)506; AIR2001SC3895; 2001CriLJ4646; 2002(79)ECC225; 2001(133)ELT16(SC); (2002)1GLR683; JT2001(7)SC459; 2001(6)SCALE232; (2001)8SCC22; 2002(1)LC41(SC)

for the appellant has not challenged before us the conviction of the appellant under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the sentence of simple imprisonment for five years and fine of Rs.5,000/-. The sole contention raised by … reached the finding that the appellant has committed the offences under section 135(1)(i) of the Act and Sections 85(1)(a) and 86 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 we think that instead of being committed to jail, the

Assistant Collector of Customs, Ministry of Finance, Government of Ind ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135; Gold Control Act - Sections 85; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1978 - Sections 377

Reported in : 2008(125)ECC305; 2008(151)LC305(P& H)

Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.1. Om Parkash, Respondent, was tried for the offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 85 of the Gold Control Act. The Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar, on 23rd

Hari Prasad Chhapolia Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1); Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 85; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 394; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 411A(2), 417 and 431; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3198; JT2008(11)SC106; (2008)7SCC690

the Orissa High Court. The appellant-Hari Prasad Chhopolia was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 135(b)(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short the `Customs Act') and Section 85 (ii), (iii), (viii) and (ix) of the Gold (Control) Act,

Hari Prasad Chhapolia Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 8, 85, 97, 97(1) and 98; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111, 135(1) and 137

Reported in : 2002(142)ELT534(Ori); 2002(I)OLR11

Tripathy, J. 1. The petitioner challenges the order of conviction for the offences under Sec. 135(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short 'the Act, 1962') and Section 85 (ii), (iii), (viii) and (ix) of the Gold (Control) Act,

Chemicals and Plastics India Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1995(1)CTC452; 1995(52)ECC92; 1995(78)ELT410(Mad)

to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The first respondent had issued a Notification under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 namely, Notification 132/85, dated 19-4-1985 exempting the goods falling under the Heading 84.66 when imported into India for

Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Calicut Vs. V.P. Sayed Mohammed

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Gold (Control) Act, 1968, Sections 85; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 123 and 135(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , - Sections 342

Reported in : AIR1983SC168; 1983CriLJ225; 1985(5)ECC215; 1983(12)ELT193(SC); 1983(1)SCALE20; (1983)1SCC370; [1983]2SCR225

stated, that the 28 gold bars in question were confiscated in a proceeding under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 23-A of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 before the Additional Collector of Customs, Cochin. … Magistrate (Judicial), Tellicherry against the respondent for offences punishable under Section 135(b) of the Customs Act read with Section 85 (ii) of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968. In support of the said prosecution four witnesses were examined by

Assistant Collector of C. Ex. Vs. K.i. Pavunni

Court : Kerala

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 108(3), 135, 135(1) and 138A; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 85(1), 86 and 98B; Evidence Act - Sections 24, 25 and 27; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193

Reported in : 1988(17)ECC361; 1988(18)LC498(Kerala); 1989(39)ELT38(Ker)

as per the price prevailed then. The respondent was prosecuted for the offences under Section 135(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short 'the Customs Act') and Sections 85(1) (a) and 86 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968. The