Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs act 1962 section 60 · Page 1 of about 2,236 results (0.074 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 20 1999

Parekh Marine Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees fo ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-20-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226;; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 60, 61, 62 and 111;; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 48, 49, 53, 54 and 56;; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Section 35

Reported in : (1999)3CALLT401(HC),2001(73)ECC464

be a permission from the Customs Authorities for sale of such goods. Sections 48 and 49 of the Customs Act. 1962 provides that if any goodsbrought into India from a place outside India are not cleared for home consumption … butbefore making such sale the Board shall give 10 days notice of the same. The relevant provision of section 60 and 61 of Act 1963 reads as under: -'60. Ship-owner's lien for freight and other charges.--(1) If the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1994

TIn Manufacturing Co. of India Vs. Central Warehousing Corpn.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-04-1994

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(43), 2(44), 15, 17, 49, 57, 58, 59, 59A, 60, 63, 69, 72(2), 111, 111(1), 112, 125 and 129A(1); Constitution of India - Article 226 - Sections 219; Import Control Regulations

Reported in : 1995(78)ELT129(All)

in view of the pendency of the dispute and bonding to be taken under Section 49 of the Customs Act, 1962 (Annexure 6 to the petition). But the Collector Customs ordered on 29-12-1987 that the goods be confiscated under … complete, it will not be safe to say that the goods had been 'warehoused' by the petitioner because Section 60 of the Act provides as under :-'60. When the provisions of Section 59 or 59A have been complied

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2008

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Shakti Lpg Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-18-2008

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 46, 47, 48, 60, 61, 61(1), 69, 69(1), 72, 72(1), 72(2) and 151A

Reported in : 2008(128)ECC71; 2008(154)LC71(SC); 2008(223)ELT129(SC); JT2008(2)SC533; 2008(2)SCALE609; (2008)4SCC496; 2008(1)LC322(SC); 2008AIRSCW2027; 2008(4)SCC496; 2008(2)Supreme226120

period came to an end. Several notices were thereafter issued to the respondent under Section 72(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter called the 'Act') raising a demand of duty etc. As no reply was forthcoming, a notice under … till the expiry of one year,after the date on which the proper officer has made an order under Section 60 permitting the deposit of the goods in a warehouse:Provided that -(i) ... (A) ... (B) ... (ii) in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 31 1970

Prakash Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. B.N. Rangwani

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-31-1970

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1971)73BOMLR200

Sea Customs Act, 1878, should be read as reference to Sections 105(1) and 110(1) and (3) of the Customs Act, 1962. Section 8(1) of the General Clauses Act reads as follows :8. (1) Where this Act, or any Central Act … and Miabhoy JJ. of this Court in the case of A. J. Butler v. Mohanlal & Co. (1957) 60 Bom. L.R. 194. In the judgment of Miabhoy J. it is observed as follows (p. 202):.In this connection

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2026

M/S Bhagwan Corporation vs Commissioner of Customs, ICD Patparganj &am ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-09-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

statutory appeal under Section 128 of the Customs Act only on 10.11.2022, i.e., beyond the statutory period of 60 days, and also beyond the maximum condonable period of 30 days.37. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), by Order … the imported goods without affording the Petitioner the statutory option of redemption fine under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962;Signing Date:10.02.2026 W.P.(C) 18556/2025 Page 2 of 27 B) Quash and set aside the consequential Order-in-Appeal dated 17.01.2024 passed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1968

Harbansingh Sardar Lenasingh and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-05-1968

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 104(1), 104(2), 108 and 135; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 60, 61 and 342; Evidence Act, 1885 - Sections 24, 25 and 114; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23; Defence of India (Amendment) Rules, 1963 - Rule 126-P; Constitution of India - Article 22(2)

Reported in : AIR1970Bom79; (1969)71BOMLR599; 1970CriLJ325

offences relating to the illegal importation and possession of 6920 Tolas of gold, under Section 135 of the Customs Act 1962 as well as under Section 23 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. It may be mentioned that … operation only after a person is 'arrested' and not till then. It is analogous to the provisions of Section 60 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is true that there is no provision similar to Section 61

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 2014

M/s. Flemingo (Duty Free Shop) Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. The Commissio ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-24-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

of India - Article 226 - Civil Procedure Code - Order XXI and Order XXIII Rule 2 - Customs Act, 1962- section 29, section 29 (2), sections 55, Section 57, sections 59, Section 60 Section 61, section 61(1) and section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2007

Commissioner of Customs Vs. I2 Technologies Software Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-02-2007

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(44), 15, 15(1), 23, 23(2), 46, 47, 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 62, 64, 68, 71, 72, 72(1), 72(2), 111, 112, 114, 117 and 130(1); Customs Rules; Customs Regulations; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2008(128)ECC245; 2008(154)LC245(Karnataka); 2007(217)ELT176(Kar); 2008(3)AIRKarR166(DB)

Arali Nagaraj, J.1. This appeal is filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore, under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') questioning the correctness of the order dated 23.8.2005 passed by the Customs, … quantities of capital goods namely computers and peripherals and with the permission of the proper officer obtained under Section 60 of the Act, deposited them into bonded warehouse. As provided under Section 61(1)(a) of the Act the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2005

Assistant Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Employees Provident ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-2005

Subject : ServiceLimitation

Acts : Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 6, 7(1), 7(1)(2), 7A, 7A(1), 7A(2), 7B, 7C, 7D to 7H, 7I, 16(1), 18, 20, 21, 21(1) and 21(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29, 29(2) and 35; Companies Act, 1956; Factories Act; Employees State Insurance Act; Sales Tax Act; Income Tax Act; Central Excise Act, 1994 - Sections 35; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 128; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 58(2) and 58(3); Kerala Rent Act, 1965 - Sections 18; Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Sections 34; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 25 and 25(2); Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(1), 8(4) and 13(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1977 - Rule 7

Reported in : 122(2005)DLT502; 2005(83)DRJ647; [2006(108)FLR35]; (2006)IILLJ388Del

examine the question raised by the applicant which reads as under:-'Whether the provision of Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962 completely bars the Commissioner (Appeals) from condoning the delay beyond the period of 30 days even in a … was preferred after more than 160 days and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to condone the delay beyond 60 days. The appeal was presented on 11.1.1999 though the order dated 10.7.1998 was received by the appellant on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1988

Bliss Impex Corporation Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-21-1988

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1988)(18)LC643Tri(Delhi)

shipping bills relating to export of frozen shrimps which were liable to confiscation under Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1962 and since the goods were not available for confiscation, he has imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on … of Customs Act and since the goods were not available for confiscation, he imposed personal penalty of Rs. 60.000/- under Section 114 ibid on the appellants. The White Cardboard was imported under Bill of Entry No.2301 dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial