Advanced Search Results
Sipta Coated Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Jul-23-1992
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(34), 4, 5, 5(1), 15, 59, 59(1), 59A, 61, 61(1), 65, 67 and 157
1993(1)BomCR201; 1992(62)ELT485(Bom)
The petitioners had imported certain goods which arrived at the Port of Bombay. Under Section 15 of the Customs Act, 1962 the petitioners can present a Bill of Entry for Warehousing. Under Section 59(1) of the Customs Act, 1962
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Jugalkishore Gupta Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Jan-13-1987
Excise
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 59, 59(3), 61, 67, 68 and 69; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act
1987(14)ECC165; 1988(36)ELT75(Bom)
him to sell and/or transfer the goods figuring in the petition vide proviso to Section 59(3) of the Customs Act, 1962 - hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'.2. The points that arise for determination in this petition have to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSewing Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Karnataka
Jan-20-1989
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 49, 59, 59(1), 63(2), 72(1), 126(2) and 142(1); Central Excise Act
1989(20)ECC47; 1989(44)ELT456(Kar); ILR1990KAR1441; 1989(1)KarLJ462
the petitioner applied for bonding of the goods in the Warehouse in accordance with Section 59 of the Customs Act 1962 ('the Act' for short) in order to avert payment of demurrage. After lengthy correspondence, the petitioner was orally
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India and Others Vs. M/S. Bangalore Wire Rod Mill, Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-19-1996
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17, 18, 58, 59(1) and 61
1996IIIAD(SC)413; AIR1996SC3371; 1996(54)ECC133; 1996(83)ELT251(SC); JT1996(3)SC435; 1996(3)SCALE3; (1996)3SCC588; [1996]3SCR656
1982, he warehoused the said goods without paying duty as contemplated by Sections 58 and 59 of the Customs Act, 1962 (the Act). On March 7, 1985, the authorities issued a notice to the respondent to clear the goods … duty. The warehousing of the goods without paying the duty was, however, subject to certain conditions specified in Section 59. Sub-section (1) of Section 59, which alone is relevant for our purposes, read thus at the relevant time
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTIn Manufacturing Co. of India Vs. Central Warehousing Corpn.
Allahabad
Oct-04-1994
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(43), 2(44), 15, 17, 49, 57, 58, 59, 59A, 60, 63, 69, 72(2), 111, 111(1), 112, 125 and 129A(1); Constitution of India - Article 226 - Sections 219; Import Control Regulations
1995(78)ELT129(All)
in view of the pendency of the dispute and bonding to be taken under Section 49 of the Customs Act, 1962 (Annexure 6 to the petition). But the Collector Customs ordered on 29-12-1987 that the goods be confiscated under … goods have been defined under Section 2(44) meaning thereby, the goods deposited in warehouse. Warehousing is done Under Section 59. It is essential that the provisions of Section 59 shall be attracted only if (i) the imported goods
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTitagarh Jute Factory Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs for Import Bo ...
Kolkata
Jul-20-1984
Customs
Companies Act; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15, 15(1), 58, 59 and 68; ;Customs Rules; ;Customs Regulations
1985(4)ECC261,1988(36)ELT55(Cal)
petitioner imports from time to time machinery and spares under licence granted by the Central Government. Under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Rules and Regulations framed thereunder an importer is allowed to warehouse the imported goods in a … as the said premises) as a licenced private bonded warehouse under Section 58 of the said Act.5. Under Section 59 of the said Act the importer of any dutiable goods which have entered for warehousing and assessed to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Ruby International (India) and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-22-1984
Customs
1985(4)ECC252
the said goods and the petitioner made an application on 21st May, 1984 under Section 59 of the Customs Act, 1962 for keeping the goods in the bonded warehouse. It is alleged that the authorities concerned did not consider
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Kolkata Port Trust Vs. Santanu Das and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-11-2004
CustomsConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 126; ;Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Section 59
(2004)3CALLT420(HC),2005(185)ELT346(Cal)
prevented from doing so at the instance of the respondent No. 6.12. Once goods arc confiscated under the Customs Act, 1962, as has been done in the instant case, such goods vest in the Central Government. Section 126 of … that the appellants have a statutory lien in respect of their charges on the goods and referred to section 59 of the Major Port Trust Act, 1963 (MPTA).9. There is no doubt that under section 59 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Mmtc Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Delhi
Apr-25-2001
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 59(3), 112 and 130(A)
2001IVAD(Delhi)1103; 92(2001)DLT465; 2002(61)DRJ686; 2001(76)ECC140; 2001(133)ELT310(Del)
ORDERArjit Pasayat, C. J. (Oral)1. This is an application under Section 130A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short the 'Act'), which relates to the consolidated order dated 7th December 2000, passed by the Customs, … case, and in fact no such condition can be prescribed in a warehousing bond in view of Section 59(3) of the Custom Act, 1962, which provides that where any goods are transferred by the owner of a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRuchi Infrastructure Limited, Indore, represented by The Manager Thoma ...
Kerala
Oct-01-2015
Land Acquisition
a private bonded warehouse at Wellingdon Island, Cochin. The bonds executed in terms of Section 59 of the Customs Act, 1962 in order to secure the revenue stood cancelled by operation of Section 73 of the Customs Act, once
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »