Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs act 1962 section 17 · Page 1 of about 6,712 results (0.077 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 16 1987

National Insulated Cable Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-16-1987

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 17; ;Customs Tariff Rules - Rule 4

Reported in : 1987(12)ECC407,1987(28)ELT248(Cal)

Chapter 40 as Synthetic Rubber as claimed by the petitioners.7. Now, in terms of Section 17 of the Customs Act, 1962, assessment of duty is required to be made after examination and testing of the imported commodity. As a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2016

Mangali Impex Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-03-2016

Subject : Customs

common question in this batch of matters pertains to the constitutional validity of Section 28 (11) of the Customs Act, 1962 ( Act )which was inserted by the Customs (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2011 ( Validation Act, 2011 ) … prior to 6th July 2011 shall be deemed to have and always had the power of assessment under Section 17 and shall be deemed to have been and always had been the proper officers..... 2. Section 28(11) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2012

Ms.Tirupati Chemicals Vs. the Commissioner of Customs

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-2012

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) - Section 17(1), 18(1)

the case may be, is unable to make self- assessment under sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and makes a request in writing to the proper officer for assessment; or b) the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2003

Mount Shivalik Breweries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-07-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17, 22, 22(3), 23(1) and 47

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)228; 103(2003)DLT78; 2004(72)DRJ789; 2003(157)ELT9(Del)

not carried out under the customs supervision and no action had been taken under Section 22(3) of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short `the Act'). Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Appellate Collector of Customs, Bombay, … goods had been brought to the notice of the Customs staff when the goods had been examined under Section 17 of the Act and (ii) that the value of the goods in the damaged condition had been determined

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2011

Ms. Best Mega International Vs. the Commissioner of Customs

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-19-2011

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act 1962 - Sections 17, 18

as restricted goods. For, such an action of the respondents are running contrary to Section 17 of the Customs Act 1962. As per Section 17 of the Customs Act, the importer is entitled to have the goods examined, assessed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1986

Metal Distributors Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-21-1986

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17(1)

Reported in : 1988(19)LC324(Bombay); 1988(37)ELT512(Bom)

of the unlawful attitude adopted by the respondents. The petitioners further claim that under Section 17(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 the Department is bound to clear the goods without under delay on lodging of the bill of entry.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2006

Phakt Overseas and Mr. Virendra Thakkar Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Subject : Banking

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR170; 2007(207)ELT223(Bom)

be in the fitness of things if the Assessing Officer completes the adjudication under Section 17 of the Customs Act, 1962 expeditiously and the petitioner cooperates with the Assessing Officer in that regard. The goods have already cleared, as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1992

Assistant Collector of Customs Vs. Associate Lumbers (P.) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-09-1992

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17, 128, 129A and E and 130E

Reported in : 1993(41)ECC230; 1993(63)ELT605(Kar); ILR1992KAR3720; 1993(1)KarLJ39

of CEGAT, in the light of the provisions contained in Section 128, 129A, 129E and 130E of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short, the 'Act'). 5.1 On the contrary, it is contended on behalf of the respondents that as … It is not in dispute that the Assistant Collector is the original authority, who has to decide under Section 17 of the Act, as to whether the goods in question are entitled to the benefit of exemption as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 1989

Singapore Colour Centre Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-1989

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1989)(24)LC148Tri(Delhi)

the truth of the contents in the bill of entry as provided for under Section 46(4) of the Customs Act, 1962. An information was received to the effect that the party imported excess goods over and above the goods … found to be US $ 22,750 CIF Madras.5. As per the detailed examination report, the importers had imported 17 complete units of KIS Mini Lab system (both used and new) apart from a few pieces of colour

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1976

The Collector of Customs Vs. Mehta Paint Works and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-1976

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17(3), 17(4), 45(1), 51, 56 and 144; Drugs Act; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 42, 43 and 43-A

Reported in : AIR1977Mad61; (1977)1MLJ15

the first respondent to obtain the clearance of the goods at a concessional rate.3. Section 45(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 provides that all imported goods unloaded in a customs area shall remain in the custody of such person … petition, is the appellant in the writ appeal. The first respondent herein, Mehta Paint Works, filed W. P. 1706 of 1967 impleading the Collector of Customs, and the Port Trust, Madras, for the issue of a Writ

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial