Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs act 1962 section 154 b · Page 1 of about 376 results (0.075 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 06 2002

R. Janardhanan Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Sep-06-2002

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC661

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2001

indo Rama Synthetics (India) Limited Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2001

Subject : Excise

Acts : Excise Act; Customs Act - Sections 27 and 154; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 265

Reported in : 2002IAD(Delhi)796; 96(2002)DLT340; 2002(62)DRJ382; 2002(143)ELT299(Del)

to see that the correct customs duly is paid having regard to the value of the imported goods--Customs Act, 1962- Section 154.; Having regard to the views we have taken, we are of the opinion that the decisions cited at … S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. Whether a mistake committed by importer in payment of higher duty owing toa computer mistake, can be subject matter of an order of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2017

Virbhadra Singh & Anr vs.enforcement Directorate & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-03-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 1923; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (since replaced by Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006); the Customs Act, 1962; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, … registered by the police WP(C) 856/2016 & connected matters Page 17 of 101 respecting a cognizable offence under Section 154 Cr.P.C. or a non- cognizable offence under Section 155 Cr.P.C.21. For the present, it only needs to be … with Mr. L.M. Asthana, Mr. Siddhant Asthana, Ms.Sahiba Pantel, Mr. Raksh Kumar Bhardawaj and Mr. Chhetarpal Singh, Advocates versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE MINISTRY OF FINANCE &

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 07 2024

Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2024

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.202

the re-assessment and/or speaking order is under Section 28 (if specifically authorized) or under Section 149 or under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962. 217. The power to issue Show Cause Notice whether under Section 28 or … statement of law; whether officers of DRI are the proper officers for the purposes of s.28 of the Customs Act, 1962; whether the introduction of s.28(11) vide the Validation Act of 2011 which retrospectively validates the show cause notices … regards the power of the DRI to issue show cause notices could be said to be the correct statement of law; whether officers of DRI

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1997

Collector of Cus. and C. Ex., Madurai Vs. Samudram

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-1997

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act,1975

Reported in : 1997(95)ELT33(Mad)

and on an application from the Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Madurai, under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the determination of the following question of law :-'Whether in the … order' dated 23-9-1983 passed by the Adjudicating Authority can be considered to be one within the scope of Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962'.2. The relevant facts necessary to appreciate the question of law referred to the … Raju, J.1. This is reference made to this Court by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, South Regional Bench at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2006

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on : Jul-07-2006

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2008)10STR515

had been wrongly computed, on account of conversion in wrong currency. In terms of Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, such clerical error/accidental slip or omission can be corrected at any time. However, in the event, the correction … 1.1. The present appeal is against an Order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as "the Commissioner (Appeals)" whereby he confirmed the order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 1994

Devkumar G. Aggarwal Vs. Collector of Customs (Prev.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-10-1994

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1994)(53)LC395Tri(Mum.)bai

of the Collector of Customs (Prev.), Bombay, Ordering confiscation of 65 gold bars vide Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, and also imposing personal penalty of Rs. 1,25,00,000/- on Devkumar Aggarwal (hereinafter referred to as the Appellant) vide … 129D(1) of the Act, by becoming apprehensive of the legality of the Order-in-Original and the corrigendum issued vide Section 154 of the Act, and have therefore, sought the reliefs as under: (a) After taking into consideration the facts … 1. Both the Appeals are directed against the Order-in-Original No.DRI/BZU/116/41/91 dt. 30.9.1992 followed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2006

Jindal Saw Ltd. Vs. C.C.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-31-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2026

M/s. Vimpro Tech Vs The Commissioner of Customs (Imports - Gr.5)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-02-2026

morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, under Section 149 read with Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.2. The petitioner claims that inadvertently, the petitioner, due … JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M/s. Vimpro Tech A-7, Thattanchavady Industrial Estate Pondicherry-605 009 by its Joint Managing Director R.B.Arvind ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Commissioner of Customs (Imports - Gr.5)2. The Addl.Commissioner of customs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1984

Collector of Customs and Central Vs. Samudram S/O Thangavel Nadar

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Sep-26-1984

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1985)LC245Tri(Chennai)

"addendum" to the above order dated 23.9.1983 (Annexure C) purported to be issued under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962 to the effect that two paragraphs, one recording its finding as to the guilt of the respondent and … persons was concerned. In the adjudication Order No. C. No.VIU/10/79/81/ Order No. 111/82 Cus. 2 dated 30.10.1982 (Annexure B) the adjudicating authority referred to the evidence against one of the accomplices, viz., Shri T. Samudram, the respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial