Advanced Search Results
R. Janardhanan Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Sep-06-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(84)ECC661
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindo Rama Synthetics (India) Limited Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2001
Excise
Excise Act; Customs Act - Sections 27 and 154; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 265
2002IAD(Delhi)796; 96(2002)DLT340; 2002(62)DRJ382; 2002(143)ELT299(Del)
to see that the correct customs duly is paid having regard to the value of the imported goods--Customs Act, 1962- Section 154.; Having regard to the views we have taken, we are of the opinion that the decisions cited at … S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. Whether a mistake committed by importer in payment of higher duty owing toa computer mistake, can be subject matter of an order of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirbhadra Singh & Anr vs.enforcement Directorate & Anr
Delhi
Jul-03-2017
Land Acquisition
Act, 1923; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (since replaced by Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006); the Customs Act, 1962; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, … registered by the police WP(C) 856/2016 & connected matters Page 17 of 101 respecting a cognizable offence under Section 154 Cr.P.C. or a non- cognizable offence under Section 155 Cr.P.C.21. For the present, it only needs to be … with Mr. L.M. Asthana, Mr. Siddhant Asthana, Ms.Sahiba Pantel, Mr. Raksh Kumar Bhardawaj and Mr. Chhetarpal Singh, Advocates versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE MINISTRY OF FINANCE &
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-07-2024
Right to Information
[2024]12S.C.R.202
the re-assessment and/or speaking order is under Section 28 (if specifically authorized) or under Section 149 or under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962. 217. The power to issue Show Cause Notice whether under Section 28 or … statement of law; whether officers of DRI are the proper officers for the purposes of s.28 of the Customs Act, 1962; whether the introduction of s.28(11) vide the Validation Act of 2011 which retrospectively validates the show cause notices … regards the power of the DRI to issue show cause notices could be said to be the correct statement of law; whether officers of DRI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Cus. and C. Ex., Madurai Vs. Samudram
Chennai
Jan-28-1997
Customs
1997(95)ELT33(Mad)
and on an application from the Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Madurai, under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the determination of the following question of law :-'Whether in the … order' dated 23-9-1983 passed by the Adjudicating Authority can be considered to be one within the scope of Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962'.2. The relevant facts necessary to appreciate the question of law referred to the … Raju, J.1. This is reference made to this Court by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, South Regional Bench at
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Jul-07-2006
Excise
(2008)10STR515
had been wrongly computed, on account of conversion in wrong currency. In terms of Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, such clerical error/accidental slip or omission can be corrected at any time. However, in the event, the correction … 1.1. The present appeal is against an Order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as "the Commissioner (Appeals)" whereby he confirmed the order
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevkumar G. Aggarwal Vs. Collector of Customs (Prev.)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jan-10-1994
Service Tax
(1994)(53)LC395Tri(Mum.)bai
of the Collector of Customs (Prev.), Bombay, Ordering confiscation of 65 gold bars vide Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, and also imposing personal penalty of Rs. 1,25,00,000/- on Devkumar Aggarwal (hereinafter referred to as the Appellant) vide … 129D(1) of the Act, by becoming apprehensive of the legality of the Order-in-Original and the corrigendum issued vide Section 154 of the Act, and have therefore, sought the reliefs as under: (a) After taking into consideration the facts … 1. Both the Appeals are directed against the Order-in-Original No.DRI/BZU/116/41/91 dt. 30.9.1992 followed by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJindal Saw Ltd. Vs. C.C.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-31-2006
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Vimpro Tech Vs The Commissioner of Customs (Imports - Gr.5)
Chennai
Feb-02-2026
morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, under Section 149 read with Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.2. The petitioner claims that inadvertently, the petitioner, due … JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M/s. Vimpro Tech A-7, Thattanchavady Industrial Estate Pondicherry-605 009 by its Joint Managing Director R.B.Arvind ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Commissioner of Customs (Imports - Gr.5)2. The Addl.Commissioner of customs
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Customs and Central Vs. Samudram S/O Thangavel Nadar
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Sep-26-1984
Customs
(1985)LC245Tri(Chennai)
"addendum" to the above order dated 23.9.1983 (Annexure C) purported to be issued under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962 to the effect that two paragraphs, one recording its finding as to the guilt of the respondent and … persons was concerned. In the adjudication Order No. C. No.VIU/10/79/81/ Order No. 111/82 Cus. 2 dated 30.10.1982 (Annexure B) the adjudicating authority referred to the evidence against one of the accomplices, viz., Shri T. Samudram, the respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »