Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs act 1962 section 135 · Page 1 of about 1,169 results (0.047 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 09 1985

Mohammed Yusuf Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-09-1985

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11, 111 and 135; Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1986(1)BomCR187; 1989(24)ECC23; 1989(24)LC718(Bombay); 1989(40)ELT14(Bom)

for the Respondents that the area and field covered by the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 and Customs Act, 1962 is distinct and different. The Customs department was not party to these proceedings. Assuming that the petitioner has … quashing the investigation started by the Preventive section of the Customs Department against the petitioner for offence under Section 135 read with Section 111(o) and Section 11 of the Customs Act.2. According to the petitioner he carries on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1977

Remo Paul Altoe Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-13-1977

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 452(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 13(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135

Reported in : AIR1977SC2255; [1978]48CompCas522(SC); 1977CriLJ1933; 1983(13)ELT1600(SC); (1977)4SCC437; [1978]1SCR719; 1977(9)LC730(SC)

the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 and was therefore liable to be convicted under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. Section 13(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 imposes restriction's on bringing or sending into India any gold

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1983

Assistant Collector of Customs (Prevention) Bombay Vs. Babu Miya Sheik ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-28-1983

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1); Export Trade Control Order, 1968; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), - Sections 120B

Reported in : AIR1983SC974; 1983CriLJ1494; 1985(5)ECC189; 1983(13)ELT1666(SC); (1983)3SCC447; [1983]3SCR500

Magistrate 5th Court Dadar for offences under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 135(1)(a)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962, Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 and Section 23(1A) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 04 1996

Dr. V.J.A. Flynn Vs. S.S. Chauhan and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1996

Subject : Customs

Acts : Antiquities Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135

Reported in : 1996CriLJ3080; 1996(37)DRJ195; ILR1998Delhi426

Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi. The grievance of the petitioner is that said complaint filed under section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the basis of the alleged offence committed under the Antiquities & Art Treasures Act, 1972 (hereinafter called

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1969

The Public Prosecutor Vs. Babulal

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-16-1969

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 123 and 135; Defence of Indian Rules, 1962 - Rule 126 (Q); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 517

Reported in : AIR1971AP345

This appeal by the State is directed against the acquittal of the respondent herein of offences punishable under Section 135 of the Customs Act and Rule, 126-P (2) of the Defence of India Rules, 1962, by the Judicial … Section 178A of the Sea Customs Act 1878 which is in pari material with Section 123(1) of the Customs Act. 1962 it was pointed out by Shah, J. in M. G. Abriol v. Amichand. : AIR1961Bom227 that before any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2002

Trilok Nath Mittal Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-12-2002

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108 and 135(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2003CriLJ184; 2002(82)ECC70; 2003(154)ELT374(All)

in Criminal Case No. 1597 of 2000 for offences under Sections 132, 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b), 136 of the Customs Act 1962. They have made request for quashing of the said complaint. Therefore, both these petitions are being disposed of … recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act is also of no help; that, therefore, Clause (1)(a) of Section 135 does not apply to the petitioners; that the petitioners never acquired possession of the goods. Therefore, the offence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1985

Y.A. Bawa Vs. Srinivas Jain

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-12-1985

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135

Reported in : 1985(8)DRJ337

issued under Section 3 of the Import & Export Control Act, 1947 read with Section 11 of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. Now, thereforee, in exercise of the powers conferred on me by Section 137(1) of the Customs Act, … Act a complaint was instituted in February 1972 by the petitioner against the respondent for his prosecution under Section 135 of the Act. It was, inter alia, averred by the prosecution that the room from which the aforesaid

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2007

Lalit Goel Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-23-2007

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135 and 135(1)

Reported in : 2007(216)ELT673(Del)

in Criminal Misc. Nos. 71789-M-2005, learned senior counsel argued that since an offence under Section 135(1)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short the 'Act') is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to three years or fine or both,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 1990

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kantilal Jawantraj Jain

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-07-1990

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135, 135(1), (2) and (3)

Reported in : 1990(50)ELT503(Bom)

court is inadequate and the same is less than the minimum sentence prescribed under Section 135(3) of the Customs Act, 1962. Sub-section (3) of Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962, runs thus :'For the purpose of sub-sections (1)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 1968

Public Prosecutor Vs. Avvaru Annappa

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-01-1968

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 25; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 14; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 126-P and 126-P(2); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135

Reported in : AIR1969AP278; 1969CriLJ1022

Collector of Central Excise and Customs Hyderabad passed Ex. P-4. the order sanctioning prosecution of the accused under Customs Act, 1962. Ex. P-5 is the sanction to prosecute the accused under Defence of India Rules (Gold Control) 1962. 4. … the offence punishable under Rule 126-P (2) (ii) and (iv) of the Defence of India Rules and under Section 135(b)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962. 18. Mr. Padmanabhareddy next contends that the offence falls both under Rule 126-P

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial