Advanced Search Results
Mrs. Latha Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-02-1988
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 123; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3
1988(16)ECC216; ILR1988KAR810; 1988(3)KarLJ71
order (Annexure-B) reads as follows :-'The gold biscuits under seizure attracts the provisions of Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, and as such the burden of proof that the said gold biscuits had not been smuggled into India
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Public Prosecutor Vs. Babulal
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-16-1969
CriminalCustoms
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 123 and 135; Defence of Indian Rules, 1962 - Rule 126 (Q); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 517
AIR1971AP345
Section 178A of the Sea Customs Act 1878 which is in pari material with Section 123(1) of the Customs Act. 1962 it was pointed out by Shah, J. in M. G. Abriol v. Amichand. : AIR1961Bom227 that before any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs (Prev.) Vs. Sudhir Saha
Kolkata
Jul-26-2004
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Section 123 and 123(2)
2004(4)CHN54,2004(95)ECC641,2004(172)ELT26(Cal)
that has been urged by Mr. Kalyan Bandhopadhyay in this case is that whether Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 could be attracted in respect of non-notified goods shifting the initial burden on the person claiming to be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Omprakash Goel Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribun ...
Allahabad
Oct-22-1986
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 123
1987(11)LC43(Allahabad); 1987(32)ELT354(All)
the following question and refer the same to this Court :'Whether the provisions of Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 could be invoked against the applicant when the alleged 5 pieces of gold were not recovered in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Shyamsunder and Others
Supreme Court of India
Jul-23-1992
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 123 and 135
AIR1994SC485; 1995(52)ECC16; 1994LC208(SC); 1994(74)ELT197(SC)
the Customs Act prevents me from interfering incriminating knowledge or belief as required by Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the part of two applicants.3. The learned Additional Solicitor General, Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi took us very meticulously … the prosecution to prove that the wrist watches in question were smuggled goods and absence of presumption under Section 123 of the Customs Act prevents me from interfering incriminating knowledge or belief as required by Section 135 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManoj Rajani Vs. Superintending Engineer, M.P.E.B. and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-28-2005
Electricity
Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 20, 26, 26(6), 53 and 67 to 69; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 42(5), 42(6), 42(7), 42(8), 185, 185(2) and 185(5); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 6(2); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 123; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20 and 226
AIR2006MP100
Batra v. State of Maharashtra : 1975CriLJ1862 . (An enactment relating to burden of proof like Section 123, Customs Act, 1962, would be a. matter of procedure); Rai Bahadur Seth Sriram Durgaprasad v. Director of Enforcement : 1987CriLJ1123 .
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Hyderabad Vs. N. As ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-30-1981
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11A, 11B, 11D, 11E, 11G, 111, 113, 115(2), 123, 123(1), 123(2), 135 and 135(1)
1984(16)ELT202(AP)
preferred against the judgment of acquittal of the accused of the offence punishable under Section 135(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') by the Special Judge for Economic Offences in C.C. No. 1 of … explain the possession of a large number of whisky bottles are sufficient to raise a reasonable belief under Section 123 of the Act. He contends that the accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 123 and their
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajeswari Vs. Joint Secretary to Government, Government of India Minis ...
Chennai
Apr-10-2000
CriminalCustoms
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Act, 1974 -- Sections 3(1); Constitution of India -- Article 21, 22(5); Customs Act, 1962 -- Sections 108, 123 and 124; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 167(2); COFEPOSA Act, 1974 -- Sections 8
2000(3)CTC97; 2000(72)ECC29
by order dated 19.5.1999.12. In paragraph 10 of the grounds It is stated:'Gold is a notified item under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962. Since, on demand, you have not been able to produce valid document for … in the grounds that a statement of B.C. Madhavan was recorded on 28.1.1999 under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 in which, he stated that he was the driver of the car belonging to the detenu and the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUsha Rani, Hyderabad Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-16-1993
Criminal
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108 and 123
1994(1)ALT(Cri)668; 1994CriLJ112
silver to acid test and found that the silver is of foreign origin. Under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, there is a presumption in favour of the department that the goods seized are smuggled goods and the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirmalaben Devchandbhai Tandel Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-02-1985
CustomsCriminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11B and 123; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1); Imports (Control) Order, 1955; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1)
1985(2)BomCR482
deemed to be goods, the import and export of which had been prohibited under section 11 of the Customs Act, 1962, and accordingly all the provisions of that Act shall have effect. The learned Counsel further submitted that Para … country.4. Dealing with this ground, the learned Counsel submitted that the Video Cassette Recorders were neither notified under section 123 nor under section 11-B of the Customs Act at the time, the seizure was made by the Customs
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »