Advanced Search Results

Comex and Co. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1998)1MLJ581

Raju, J.1. The above reference came to be made under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 at the instance of the applicant-Company to refer the following question for our consideration:Whether the Tribunal was correct … is unauthorised in the absence of valid import licence and the same is accordingly liable to confiscation under Section 11l(d) of Customs Act, 1962, read with Section 3(2) of Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947.By the aforesaid acts,

Mohanlal Devdanbhai Choksey and ors. Vs. M.P. Mondkar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11A, 11-I, 11J, 11K, 11L, 11M, 110, 110(1), 110(2), 110(3), 111, 112, 113, 124 and 126

Reported in : 1988(19)LC180(Bombay)

of gold and silver bullion. On January 10, 1969 the petitioners delivered to the proper officer under the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') an intimation under Section 11J of the Act in respect of their … Central Government to intimate particulars of the place where goods were kept or stored by him. Sections 11K, 11L and 11M, regulate the transport thereof. Chapter XIII of the Act contains provisions relating to searches, seizure and

Baccorose Perfumes and Beauty Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Chandan Mal M. JaIn Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1986)(6)LC421Tri(Mum.)bai

consequently as the appellant was found to have not complied with the provisions of Section 11L of the Customs Act, 1962, proceedings were instituted against the appellant as per law which ultimately culminated in the impugned order now appealed

Atma Singh and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1997)(96)ELT80Tri(Mum.)bai

appeals is against the order of the Commissioner of Customs, Nava Sheva, confiscating under Section 11l(d) of the Customs Act, [1962], goods described as "used industrial engines for polishing and grinding purposes" giving option to redeem on payment of

State of Maharashtra Vs. Umar Badshah Hassan Damudi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11-I, 11J, 11K, 11L, 111, 113, 113(L), 134 and 135

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR788

of Customs, had filed a complaint charging the accused with the commission of an offence under of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The complaint disclosed the following facts :- In pursuance of certain information the Customs and Central Excise … illegal transport and storage of the said silver in the said godown in contravention of the provisions of Sections, and L of the Customs Act, 1962. This was done with a view to facilitate the export of

AbdullabIn Ibrahim Arab Vs. Collector of Customs (Prev.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1992)(41)LC626Tri(Mum.)bai

stated above and Abdullabin Ibrahim Arab appear to have not observed the provisions of Chapter IV-B of the Customs Act, 1962 as detailed above.As such, there is no mention as to which specific provision of law, has been violated … show cause notice, though the reference is made to Section 11-J, 11-K, 11L and 11M of the Customs Act, the allegation levelled against the appellant, … the order-in-original No. 74/Addl Collr/1983 dated 18.1.1984 ordering absolute confiscation of 10,394 silver coins weighing 124.186 kgs. vide Section 113(c)(1) of the Customs Act, and also imposing personal penalty of Rs. 25,000/- vide Section 114 of the

Kamal Kanaiyalal Lohia Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2004)(175)ELT590Tri(Mum.)bai

liable to confiscation under Section 11l(m) and the importer is liable for penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962.8. One would have thought that M/s. SGS a body who specializes in examination of goods would give

Collector of Customs (P) Vs. Jagdishchandra Laxidas Sharma

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1988)(37)ELT358Tri(Mum.)bai

he is knowingly concerned with the silver, having contravened Sections 11J and 11L of Chapter IVB of the Act; and (4) Whether Customs department has … 1. This Reference application under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act is by the Collector of Customs (P), Ahmedabad. This arises out of the common order dated 17-10-1986 passed … department has proved that Shri J.L Sharma had contravened the provisions of Chapter IVB of the Customs Act, 1962.2. Perused the reference application, the common order in the two appeals and heard Shri Mondal.3. Under Section 131

Chail Singh Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT810TriDel

the same had been smuggled from Pakistan and was therefore liable to confiscation under Section 111(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. The recoveries were handed over to Customs officers on 21-11-86 for further action. Test of the silver bar … issued for transportation to non-specified area. Thus, it was held there was contravention of Section 11C, 11H, 11J, 11L and UK of the Act. The silver was ordered to be confiscated along with cloth bag without fixing