Advanced Search Results

State of Maharashtra Vs. Umar Badshah Hassan Damudi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11-I, 11J, 11K, 11L, 111, 113, 113(L), 134 and 135

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR788

Rule is made absolute. Customs Act (LII of 1962), Chap. IVB, Sections 11J, 11K, 11-L, 135(a), (b), 113(1), 111, 2(39) - Sea Customs Act (VIII … of Customs, had filed a complaint charging the accused with the commission of an offence under of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The complaint disclosed the following facts :- In pursuance of certain information the Customs and Central Excise … illegal transport and storage of the said silver in the said godown in contravention of the provisions of Sections, and L of the Customs Act, 1962. This was done with a view to facilitate the export of

Mohanlal Devdanbhai Choksey and ors. Vs. M.P. Mondkar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11A, 11-I, 11J, 11K, 11L, 11M, 110, 110(1), 110(2), 110(3), 111, 112, 113, 124 and 126

Reported in : 1988(19)LC180(Bombay)

of gold and silver bullion. On January 10, 1969 the petitioners delivered to the proper officer under the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') an intimation under Section 11J of the Act in respect of their

S.C. Roy and Others Vs. Kantilal Nanchand and Co. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11H, 11-I, 11J, 11K, 11K(2), 111, 113, 113(1) and 114

Reported in : 1989(41)ELT191(Bom)

There is also a certain quantity of scrap silver in crude shapes. Now, under, Chapter-IV B of the Customs Act, 1962 certain provisions have been made, inter alia, for prevention or detection of illegal export of goods. This Chapter … Supreme Court.18. Application rejected. Customs - confiscation - Sections 11 H, 11-I, 11J, 11 K, 11K (2), 111, 113, 113 (1) and 114 of Customs … why 'silver bullion in various forms such as statues, 'thalis' and 'kadas' etc. should not be confiscated under Section 113(1) of the Customs Act and why penalty should not be imposed under Section 114 of the said

Ukchand Ranka Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madras and or ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11(J), 11(K) and 11(L), 110(2), 113(1), 114 and 125

Reported in : 1987(13)ECC152; 1987(30)ELT144(Mad)

advance with a copy to him. A show cause notice was issued on 14-10-1975 charging the petitioner under Section 11J, K and L of the Customs Act, 1962. In reply, the counsel for the petitioner in his letter … Madras-34, for the extension of time for a further period of six months under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 (Act for short). In response to this, by letter dated 14-4-1975, the counsel for the petitioner requested two

AbdullabIn Ibrahim Arab Vs. Collector of Customs (Prev.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1992)(41)LC626Tri(Mum.)bai

stated above and Abdullabin Ibrahim Arab appear to have not observed the provisions of Chapter IV-B of the Customs Act, 1962 as detailed above.As such, there is no mention as to which specific provision of law, has been violated … the factual averments made in the show cause notice, the harp is on violations of the provisions of Section 11J. Section 11K pertains to transport of specified goods under cover of a voucher. Section 11-L provides for maintenance

Bhanabhai Khalpabhai Vs. Collector of Customs and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11J(2), 108, 135(1) and 138A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106 and 114; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Customs (Amendment) Act, 1973

Reported in : 1994(1)Crimes940(SC); 1997(57)ECC155; 1994(71)ELT3(SC); JT1994(2)SC591; 1994(2)SCALE238; 1994Supp(2)SCC143; [1994]2SCR348

in any fraudulent evasion or attempt at evasion of any prohibition for the time being imposed under the Customs Act,. 1962 with respect to such goods, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to … N.P. Singh, J.1. The appellant was convicted by the Magistrate for an offence under Section 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment

Collector of Customs (P) Vs. Jagdishchandra Laxidas Sharma

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1988)(37)ELT358Tri(Mum.)bai

yes, whether he is knowingly concerned with the silver, having contravened Sections 11J and 11L of Chapter IVB of the Act; and (4) Whether Customs … 1. This Reference application under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act is by the Collector of Customs (P), Ahmedabad. This arises out of the common order dated 17-10-1986 passed … department has proved that Shri J.L Sharma had contravened the provisions of Chapter IVB of the Customs Act, 1962.2. Perused the reference application, the common order in the two appeals and heard Shri Mondal.3. Under Section 131

Chail Singh Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT810TriDel

the same had been smuggled from Pakistan and was therefore liable to confiscation under Section 111(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. The recoveries were handed over to Customs officers on 21-11-86 for further action. Test of the silver bar … voucher issued for transportation to non-specified area. Thus, it was held there was contravention of Section 11C, 11H, 11J, 11L and UK of the Act. The silver was ordered to be confiscated along with cloth bag without