Advanced Search Results

Manilal Bhanabhai Patel Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11H, 11K, 11M, 108, 113 and 114

Reported in : 1992(38)ECC113; 1992(60)ELT99(Guj); (1992)1GLR201

judgment and order dated 25-2-1976 passed by the Additional Collector of Customs, Ahmedabad, under Section 113(c) of the Customs Act, 1962, confiscating 90 ........ silver bars weighing 2770.900 kgs. and imposing a penalty of rupees two lacs against the … for a citizen to take goods within a particular area and at the relevant time, the provisions of Section 11H or 11M of the Customs Act were not in force. 10. In our view, there is no substance

Ramakrishna Aggarwal Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Customs

Court : Orissa

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11H, 11K, 113, 113(1), 114, 114(1), 115, 115(2) and 125; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1988(16)ECC249; 1989(24)LC706(Orissa); 1989(39)ELT183(Ori)

allowing redemption thereof on payment of Rs. 25,000 and still further imposing penalty under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. Facts stated by petitioner No. 1 are that he carried on money … that silver is specified goods and Bombay is a specified area within the meaning of definitions contained in Section 11H of the Act. He also did not dispute that petitioner No. 1 was transporting silver in the car

Devchandbhai Jagubhai Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1981CriLJ684

prohibited under Section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 read with Section 11 of the Customs Act, 1962. The silver under seizure was 'specified goods' because of the notification dated 3-1-1969 issued under Section 11(1) of … bars was Surat, It is common ground before me that Broach is within the specified area contemplated by Section 11H of the Customs Act and that the silver bars were specified goods within the meaning of Section 11H.

S.C. Roy and Others Vs. Kantilal Nanchand and Co. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11H, 11-I, 11J, 11K, 11K(2), 111, 113, 113(1) and 114

Reported in : 1989(41)ELT191(Bom)

There is also a certain quantity of scrap silver in crude shapes. Now, under, Chapter-IV B of the Customs Act, 1962 certain provisions have been made, inter alia, for prevention or detection of illegal export of goods. This Chapter … why 'silver bullion in various forms such as statues, 'thalis' and 'kadas' etc. should not be confiscated under Section 113(1) of the Customs Act and why penalty should not be imposed under Section 114 of the said

Shri Sanjoy Kumar and ors. Vs. Commr. of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(123)ECC62

also argue that the very basis of confiscation is notification No. 50 - Customs dated 23/3/80 issued under Section 11H of the Customs Act, 1962. They argued that the said notification has been issued in the context of … mosquito nets of third country origin and he has absolutely confiscated the same under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant points out that in paragraph 5.2, the very same goods have

Smt. Fatmabai Abdulkadar W/O Abdul Kadar Abdul Raheman Vs. Shyamal Gho ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1975)16GLR846

into, out of or through any specified area as defined in Clause (c) of Section 11H of the Customs Act, 1962.The marginal noted with regard to this section are as under:Cases in which and circumstances under which persons

Sheesh NaraIn Agarwal Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1995)(76)ELT207TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Shri Brij Mohan and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)(37)LC217Tri(Delhi)

confiscated absolutely 30 pieces of silver weighing 32.010 Kgs. valued at Rs. 1,21,638/- under Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1962 and imposed personal penalty of Rs. 35,000/- on Shri Tilak Raj and Rs. 5000/- on the other 3 … a voucher when it was admittedly transported from Delhi to Amritsar which is an offence in terms of Section 11H and K of the Customs Act read with Notification No. 50 & 51 dated 27.3.1980 issued by the

AbdullabIn Ibrahim Arab Vs. Collector of Customs (Prev.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1992)(41)LC626Tri(Mum.)bai

stated above and Abdullabin Ibrahim Arab appear to have not observed the provisions of Chapter IV-B of the Customs Act, 1962 as detailed above.As such, there is no mention as to which specific provision of law, has been violated … area. The question, whether, an area could be declared as a specified area by a Public Notice, when Section 11H, Clause (c), requires issuance of a notification in the instant case becomes unnecessary to be answered, as, in

Chail Singh Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT810TriDel

the same had been smuggled from Pakistan and was therefore liable to confiscation under Section 111(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. The recoveries were handed over to Customs officers on 21-11-86 for further action. Test of the silver bar … transport voucher issued for transportation to non-specified area. Thus, it was held there was contravention of Section 11C, 11H, 11J, 11L and UK of the Act. The silver was ordered to be confiscated along with cloth bag