Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai Vs. M.M.K. Jewellers and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-11-2008
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11A, 18, 28, 28AB, 28(1), 28(2), 28(3), 72(1), 108, 111, 112, 114, 114A, 130E, 135, 135A, 140 and 143(3); Finance Act, 2000
2008(127)ECC1; 2008(153)LC1(SC); 2008(225)ELT3(SC); 2008(4)SCALE417; (2008)5SCC617; 2008AIRSCW2353
(a) and (b) respectively of Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 and also the mandatory penalty under Section 114A of the said Act.7. Now, therefore, the respondent was called upon to pay Rs. 20,82,255.45 as customs duty … aforesaid Customs Notification and, consequently, appear to have rendered themselves liable for confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962.6. It, therefore, prima facie indicates that the respondent did or omitted to do an act which act or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.K. Enterprises and anr. Vs. Commnr. of Customs and Central Excise an ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-22-2007
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 23(2), 28(2), 28AB, 112, 114, 114A, 115, 115(2), 125 and 125(1); Finance Act, 2000
2007(123)ECC290; 2007(149)LC290(SC); 2007(218)ELT481(SC); JT2008(1)SC73; 2007(3)SCALE477; 2008AIRSCW712.
accepted the appeal filed by the Revenue and enhanced the amount of penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short 'the Act') from Rs. 50,000/- as imposed by the Commissioner of Customs, Goa to Rs. 10,00,000/-
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S R.S. Trade Link and Others Vs. Cc, New Delhi
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-30-2010
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Carpenter Classic Exim P. Ltd. Vs. Commnr. of Customs (imports) and an ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-12-2009
Customs
Customs Act 1962 - Sections 28AB, 28(2), 108, 111, 112, 114 and 114A; Finance Act, 2000
2009(164)LC117(SC); 2009(235)ELT201(SC); 2009(3)SCALE144; (2009)11SCC293
of M/s. Carpenter Classic Exim Pvt. Ltd., V.S. Chandan, CADD Operator were recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act 1962 (in short the Act). The residential premises of Shri Sanjeev Kabbur, Ex-Marketing Manager of the company were searched … liable to penalty under Section 112(a) of the Act and the company was also liable to penalty under Section 114A of the Act. The differential duty was to be paid alongwith interest. The penalty however was deleted so
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Chavda Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Sep-25-2002
Land Acquisition
(2003)(155)ELT47Tri(Mum.)bai
alia cancelled the private bonded warehouse licence of M/s. Parson Brothers in terms of Section 58(2)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, confirmed duty demand of Rs. 2,01,712/- together with interest on M/s. Parson Brothers on goods covered by Shipping … of Sections lll(d), lll(j) and lll(o) of the Customs Act and penalty of amount equal to duty under Section 114A of the Act, imposed penalties of Rs. 25,000/- and Rs. 55,000/- respectively on Shri Rajendra Bansal and Shri
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFlora Wall Coverings Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
May-23-2003
Customs
(2003)(89)ECC677
under Section 28AB of the Customs Act, 1962; and (vii) Penalty should not be imposed on them under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 or alternatively under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962.As Shri M.S.A. Aleem, … for violation of the provisions of Customs Notification 13/81 dtd. 9.2.81 and provisions of Section 65 of the Customs Act, 1962; (ii) The duty of Rs. 4,30,300 paid by them under TR6 challan d td. 2.12.97 should not be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Vanick Oils and Fats Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce, Delhi-iii, Gurgaon
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Feb-05-2014
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Renuga Soft-x Towels, (Spinning and Towels Division) Represented ...
Chennai
Apr-15-2008
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11AC, 32, 32(1), 32(6) and 32(7); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 114A, 117, 245C and 245D
2008(229)ELT359(Mad)
proceedings under Section 11-AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 114-A and Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962. As against the said demand, petitioners preferred an application before the second respondent in some cases admitting the … these writ petitions are allowed. Consequently, connected M.Ps. are also closed. No costs. Customs - Custom Duty - Section 114A of Central Excise Act and 117 of Customs Act,1962 - Respondent issued show cause notice and proposed duty
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoyal Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-04-2006
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28(1), 28AB, 72(1), 111, 112, 114A and 129E
2006(204)ELT564(P& H); 2006[4]STR425
and 16846 of 2006.2. The petitioners imported raw material without payment of duty. The adjudicating authority under the Customs Act, 1962, after show cause notice, confirmed demand of duty against the petitioners, apart from other directions, in following terms:1. … Lakhs Three Thousands Eight Hundreds and seventy Two only) on M/s. Royal Industries Limited, Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962;5. I order adjustment of Rs. 22,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Two Lakhs) already deposited by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Customs (imports) Vs. Pride Foramer
Mumbai
Apr-24-2006
Customs
Customs, Act, 1962 - Sections 27(2), 28, 28(2), 28AB, 35H, 111, 112, 114A, 129A, 129B and 130; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254, 254(1), 254(2) and 256; Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 41; Constitution of India - Article 226
2006(4)BomCR737; 2006(204)ELT381(Bom); 2006[4]STR401
not recovered under proviso to Section 28 of the Customs Act;(c) penalty be not imposed on them under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 and(d) interest be not charged under Section 28AB of the Customs Act, 1962. … cause as to why(a) the Rig, 'Pride Pennsylvania' value at Rs.1,96,69,50,295/-be not confiscated under Section 111(m) of the Customs, Act, 1962;(b) the differential duty of customs amounting to Rs.52,13,50,125/-be not recovered under proviso to Section 28 of the Customs
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »