Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs act 1962 chapter 29 · Page 1 of about 1,045 results (0.045 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 04 1989

Upper India Steel Mfg. and Engg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-04-1989

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A to 57J and 173G; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1990(27)ECC228; 1990(49)ELT22(P& H)

said inputs in the country, except such stocks lying in a factory customs area as defined in the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) or a warehouse as are clearly recognisable as being non-duty paid, may be deemed to … Rule 57A, the Central Government issued Notification No. 177/86-C.E., dated 1-3-1986 Annexure P-2. The notification, inter alia specified Chapter 72 both in the list of inputs as well as that of the final products which qualified for … tonne.6. The petitioners filed declaration with Annexures P-5A to C on March 29, 1986. A classification list Annexure P-6 was also filed.7. On August 29,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2006

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-01-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2001

M/S Vigiram Chem Pbt Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Customs,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Feb-08-2001

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Parties M/S Vigiram Chem Pbt Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Customs,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 2001

Vigiram Chem. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Feb-08-2001

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(96)LC542Tri(Bang.)alore

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 2009

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-04-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

21 of the SEZ Rules, 2006, it was also clarified that the provisions of Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 were inapplicable for the purpose of levying export duty for the aforesaid movement of goods, as such movement … Section 2(27) to include the territorial waters of India. Mr. Champaneri further submitted that Section 12 contained in Chapter V of the said Act provides that except as otherwise provided in the said Act, or any other

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1987

Decor India and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-18-1987

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1987)(12)LC1150Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Parties Decor India and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2000

S. Chandra Sekharan Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Oct-24-2000

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2001)(132)ELT751Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1995

Mangla Trading Co. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-25-1995

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(81)ELT397TriDel

Matched in: Parties Mangla Trading Co. Vs. Collector of Customs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2004

Pushpanjali Floriculture Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-2004

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2004)(97)ECC321

Matched in: Parties Pushpanjali Floriculture Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2001

Pride Foramer Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-24-2001

Subject : Customs

Acts : Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 - Sections 6, 6(6), 7 and 7(7); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(21), 12, 14, 15, 53, 54, 57, 86(2) and 87; Constitution of India - Articles 1(3), 51 and 297; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28)

Reported in : AIR2001Bom332; 2002(1)ALLMR151; 2002(4)BomCR751; 2002(148)ELT19(Bom); 2001(3)MhLj819

Delhi had published the Gazette of India extraordinary dated 1st December, 1997 notifying that the extensions of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 to the designated areas in the Continental Shelf and Exclusive Economic Zone … transit State. CONSIDERATION/FINDINGS27. The Customs Act is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to customs. Chapter V thereof deals with levy of and exemption from customs duty. Section 12 is the charging section. Under … refers to the landmass of India. He went to urge that Article 297 either as originally framed or as amended from time to time, does

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial