Advanced Search Results
Upper India Steel Mfg. and Engg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-04-1989
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A to 57J and 173G; Constitution of India - Article 226
1990(27)ECC228; 1990(49)ELT22(P& H)
said inputs in the country, except such stocks lying in a factory customs area as defined in the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) or a warehouse as are clearly recognisable as being non-duty paid, may be deemed to … Rule 57A, the Central Government issued Notification No. 177/86-C.E., dated 1-3-1986 Annexure P-2. The notification, inter alia specified Chapter 72 both in the list of inputs as well as that of the final products which qualified for … tonne.6. The petitioners filed declaration with Annexures P-5A to C on March 29, 1986. A classification list Annexure P-6 was also filed.7. On August 29,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Nov-01-2006
Service Tax
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Vigiram Chem Pbt Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Customs,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Feb-08-2001
Service Tax
Matched in: Parties M/S Vigiram Chem Pbt Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Customs,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vigiram Chem. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Feb-08-2001
Excise
(2001)(96)LC542Tri(Bang.)alore
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEssar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Gujarat
Nov-04-2009
Customs
Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income
[2010]24STT121
21 of the SEZ Rules, 2006, it was also clarified that the provisions of Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 were inapplicable for the purpose of levying export duty for the aforesaid movement of goods, as such movement … Section 2(27) to include the territorial waters of India. Mr. Champaneri further submitted that Section 12 contained in Chapter V of the said Act provides that except as otherwise provided in the said Act, or any other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDecor India and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jun-18-1987
Service Tax
(1987)(12)LC1150Tri(Delhi)
Matched in: Parties Decor India and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Chandra Sekharan Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Oct-24-2000
Customs
(2001)(132)ELT751Tri(Chennai)
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMangla Trading Co. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Aug-25-1995
Land Acquisition
(1996)(81)ELT397TriDel
Matched in: Parties Mangla Trading Co. Vs. Collector of Customs
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPushpanjali Floriculture Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Sep-21-2004
Land Acquisition
(2004)(97)ECC321
Matched in: Parties Pushpanjali Floriculture Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPride Foramer Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-24-2001
Customs
Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 - Sections 6, 6(6), 7 and 7(7); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(21), 12, 14, 15, 53, 54, 57, 86(2) and 87; Constitution of India - Articles 1(3), 51 and 297; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28)
AIR2001Bom332; 2002(1)ALLMR151; 2002(4)BomCR751; 2002(148)ELT19(Bom); 2001(3)MhLj819
Delhi had published the Gazette of India extraordinary dated 1st December, 1997 notifying that the extensions of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 to the designated areas in the Continental Shelf and Exclusive Economic Zone … transit State. CONSIDERATION/FINDINGS27. The Customs Act is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to customs. Chapter V thereof deals with levy of and exemption from customs duty. Section 12 is the charging section. Under … refers to the landmass of India. He went to urge that Article 297 either as originally framed or as amended from time to time, does
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »