Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs act 1962 chapter 24 · Page 1 of about 1,238 results (0.058 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 02 2003

Harshvardhan Exports and R.C. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-02-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(90)ECC403

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2003

Harshvardhan Exports and Shri Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-02-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1974

State of Maharashtra Vs. Umar Badshah Hassan Damudi

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-1974

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11-I, 11J, 11K, 11L, 111, 113, 113(L), 134 and 135

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR788

India falling within the territory of the State of Maharashtra as a specified area for the purposes of Chapter IV-B of the Customs Act, 1962 (as amended). It is said that the accused jointly and severally had … of Customs, had filed a complaint charging the accused with the commission of an offence under of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The complaint disclosed the following facts :- In pursuance of certain information the Customs and Central Excise … whether the trial of the accused in different sets should be separated. 24. Various other interesting questions are raised in the present case as to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 04 2009

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-04-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

21 of the SEZ Rules, 2006, it was also clarified that the provisions of Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 were inapplicable for the purpose of levying export duty for the aforesaid movement of goods, as such movement … Section 2(27) to include the territorial waters of India. Mr. Champaneri further submitted that Section 12 contained in Chapter V of the said Act provides that except as otherwise provided in the said Act, or any other … Commissionerate had also sought clarification from the petitioners vide his letter dated 24-10-2007 regarding levy of export duty on iron ore pellets. The petitioners' Hazira

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1983

Roshan Beevi and ors. Vs. Joint Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-09-1983

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 20(3), 21, 22, 22(2) and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 99, 193, 225, 228, 241, 339 and 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 36(1), 43, 45, 45(1), 46, 160(1), 164, 167(1), 438 and 439; Evidence Act - Sections 24, 25, 26 and 27

Reported in : 1984(15)ELT289(Mad)

allied provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, as well as the various Provisions relating to arrest coming under Chapter IV, Cr.P.C., and submitted that the moment the personal liberty of a person and the freedom of his … (2) Are the terms 'custody' and 'arrest' synonymous (3) Are the customs officials vested with powers under the Customs Act, 1962 to detain any person for any period and at any place for the purpose of an inquiry, interrogation … custody with the Customs Department without being produced before the Magistrate within 24 hours as envisaged in Article 22(2) of the Constitution of India, would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1975

Collector of Customs and Central Excise, West Bengal and ors. Vs. Hind ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-14-1975

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11, 40, 47, 110(2) and 124; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 3; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Section 19; ;Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Section 3

Reported in : AIR1975Cal368,79CWN648,1979(4)ELT313(Cal)

1969 the Customs Authorities effected a seizure of 9 drums of primary nickel under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962.5. Between October 15, 1969 and November 29, 1969 on diverse dates the Enforcement Directorate served notice under Section … etc.- No order confiscating any goods or imposing any penalty on any person shall be made under this Chapter unless the owner of the goods or such person--(a) is given a notice in writing informing him of … reply to the show cause notice denying the allegations made.18. On March 24 and 25, 1971 theappellate court delivered judgment in FMA280 of 1970. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2022

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 19 of the 2002 Act, are equally stringent and of higher 534 Ed.: Section 104 of the Customs Act, 1962. 367 standard. Those safeguards ensure that the authorised officers do not act arbitrarily, but make them accountable for … manner which may result in frustrating any proceedings relating to confiscation of such proceeds of crime under this Chapter, he may, by order in writing, provisionally attach such property for a period not exceeding one hundred and … possibilities for confiscation under the PMLA.” *** *** *** “General comments” 314 244. Since confiscation is linked to a conviction it is not possible to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2016

Malabar Diamond Gallery Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Additional Director General ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-28-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

have been complied with." He further submitted that import of gold is not prohibited. He further submitted that Chapter IV of the Customs Act, 1962 deals with prohibitions on importation and exportation of goods. According to him, … also contended that the request to provisionally release the seized goods in terms of Section 110-A of the Customs Act, 1962 was not considered, despite appellant's assurance that they would cooperate in the investigation and therefore, they were constrained … gold bars of 22 ct from the buyers; that 4.627 Kgs of 24 ct gold bars/bits seized from his premises are nothing but proceeds of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2010

Commissioner of Customs C.G.O. Vs. Sonam International Shop No.9

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-07-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

1.Present first appeal from order, under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 (in short the Act), has been preferred against the impugned order dated 5.4.2005, passed by the Customs, Excise … Supplement" are different products and have different identity under the Customs Tariff, while the former is classifiable under Chapter 29, the latter is classifiable under Chapter 23. 18.Under Explanatory Note to HSN (Chapter 23), the characteristic feature … Carbonate) 500 gms, BHT 05 gms and stabilizers 05 gms, per kg. 24.These two reports show different chemical compositions of the same product "AV-110" has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 2002

Mr. V.J.A. Flynn and Mr. Shyam Sunder Rastogi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-26-2002

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 4, 108, 110, 113, 118, 122, 124 and 135; Antiquities and Art Treasure Act, 1972 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 24; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3 and 9; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142(1), 143(2) and 148

Reported in : 2003(66)DRJ381; 2003(86)ECC129; 2003(159)ELT92(Del)

show cause notice dated 2nd December, 1994, issued by the Collector of Customs under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962, as to why the seized goods be not confiscated and personal penalty be not imposed on the petitioners. … of goods. etc. -- No order confiscating any goods or imposing any penalty shall be made under this Chapter unless the owner of the goods or such person--(a) is given a notice in writing informing him of … Archaeological Survey of India, certifying the coins to be antiquities under Section 24 of the Antiquities Act is a pre-requisite to the issuance of show

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial