Advanced Search Results

Om Prakash and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 9A, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21; Customs Act, 1962; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 (Cr.P.C.) - Sections 2(a), 155, 436, 173; Evidence Act - Section 25

1. Two sets of matters have been heard together, one relating to the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, and the other involving the provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944, since the issue in both sets … 9 shall be deemed to be non-cognizable within the meaning of that Code. (2) Any offence under this Chapter may, either before or after the institution of prosecution, be compounded by the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise

Harshvardhan Exports and R.C. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(90)ECC403

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Harshvardhan Exports and Shri Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Hindustan Electronics (Gem Vs. Collector of Customs and Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Miscellaneous

Reported in : (1987)(31)ELT252TriDel

is on the Revenue and not on the appellant because notifications were issued under Section 11C of the Customs Act, 1962 (Chapter IV) and there are no corresponding notifications or amendment of law under Section 123 of the Customs Act, … appellant and the residential premises of the Proprietor Shri M. Mohindroo. The Preventive Staff prepared a panchnama dated 20-11-198* detaining the seized goods worth Rs. 59,300/- as shown in Annexures A, B & C of panchnama. The

Collr. of Customs Vs. National Insulated Cable Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 17; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 4

Reported in : 1994(46)ECC101,1994(74)ELT568(Cal)

and not synthetic rubber. The Customs authorities demanded customs duty at higher rates under chapter 39 of the Customs Act, 1962 [First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975] instead of assessing the same as synthetic rubber under Chapter … the Trial Court are as under: 1. The writ petitioner, the respondent herein having its factory at Shyamnagar, 24-Parganas, West Bengal, is carrying on the business of manufacturing various types of electrical cables and wires. In course

State of Maharashtra Vs. Umar Badshah Hassan Damudi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11-I, 11J, 11K, 11L, 111, 113, 113(L), 134 and 135

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR788

of Customs, had filed a complaint charging the accused with the commission of an offence under of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The complaint disclosed the following facts :- In pursuance of certain information the Customs and Central Excise … India falling within the territory of the State of Maharashtra as a specified area for the purposes of Chapter IV-B of the Customs Act, 1962 (as amended). It is said that the accused jointly and severally had

M/s. Amritlakshmi Machine Works and Another Vs. The Commissioner of Cu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

four appeals (two by the partnership firm and two by its managing partner) under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (the Act) from a common order dated 7th May 2012 of the Customs, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal … The scheme of the Act and FERA are entirely different. The Act unlike FERA is divided into different chapters and certain provisions/ sections of the Act, are made applicable only to a particular chapter. This chapterization is … 1. This Full Bench has been constituted on a reference made on 23rd April, 2015 by a Division Bench of this Court in Amritlakshmi Machine

Jayantilal Kalidas Mehta Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1972)74BOMLR391

two accused and one more person, alleging offences under Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962, Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, Section 23 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, … true that Section 137 itself does not contain any provision in this respect. In this respect provisions of Chapter XIV of the Act are material. These provisions make it clear that ample opportunity is given to the … is preferred by accused No. 1 Jayantilal Kalidas Mehta, and accused No. 2, Bharatkumar Jayantilal, against the order passed by the learned Presidency Magistrate, 28th

Subhash Photographics Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 25(1) and 157

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR49; 1992(62)ELT270(Bom)

from Singapore certain photographic machineries. These photographic machineries, when imported, were subject to levy of duty under the Customs Act, 1962 read with Customs Tariff Act, 1975. There is no dispute in this regard. The controversy is only in … the new tariff schedule, corresponding to the old Heading No. 84.66 is Heading No. 98.01. It is in Chapter 98, which refers to Project Import etc. Heading No. 98.01 reads : ------------------------------------------------------------------------Heading Description of Articles Rate of … concessional rate of duty applicable to goods falling under the said heading. 2. The facts, relevant for the purpose of determination of the controversy in

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Jhunjhunwala Vanaspati Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 2(26), 17, 30, 30(3), 41, 45, 46, 46(1), 46(2), 46(4), 46(5), 46(5), 47, 47(1), 66(1), 130 and 149; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 90; Customs (Amendment) Act, 1991; Imports (Control) Order 1955; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947

Reported in : 2008(120)ECC231; 2008(156)LC231(Gujarat); 2008(232)ELT600(Guj)

Ravi R. Tripathi, J.1. By this appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, Commissioner of Customs, Kandla is before this Court being aggrieved by judgment and order dated 26.12.2006 rendered in … Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent') imported a consignment of Crude palm oil-non-edible grade/industrial grade falling under Chapter Heading No. 1511 90 90 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Out of the same, the respondent sold … Kandla is before this Court being aggrieved by judgment and order dated 26.12.2006 rendered in Appeal No. C/978/2006 by the Customs Excise & Service Tax