Advanced Search Results

Subhash Photographics Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 25(1) and 157

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR49; 1992(62)ELT270(Bom)

from Singapore certain photographic machineries. These photographic machineries, when imported, were subject to levy of duty under the Customs Act, 1962 read with Customs Tariff Act, 1975. There is no dispute in this regard. The controversy is only in … the new tariff schedule, corresponding to the old Heading No. 84.66 is Heading No. 98.01. It is in Chapter 98, which refers to Project Import etc. Heading No. 98.01 reads : ------------------------------------------------------------------------Heading Description of Articles Rate of … Dr. B. P. Saraf, J. 1. The question for determination in this batch of writ petitions is whether

Harshvardhan Exports and R.C. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(90)ECC403

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Harshvardhan Exports and Shri Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Radhika Agarwal versus Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.1331

for Consideration Challenge to the constitutional validity and the right of the authorized officers to arrest under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act).Headnotes† Customs Act, 1962 - Finance Act, 2012 … Services Tax Act, 2017 - ss.69, 70, 132 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - ss.4, 5, 50; Chapter XII - Constitution of India - Articles 246-A, 21 22(1), 32, 226 - Om Prakash case held that

Roshanlal B. JaIn and anr. Vs. Cc (P)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1999)(85)LC181Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Indian Express Newspapers, (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 2003(1)BomCR667; 2003(86)ECC422; 2002LC584(Bombay); 2003(1)MhLj31

technology decided to import 4 Web Fed High Speed Offset Rotary machine from three different parties.3. Under the Customs Act, 1962 ('Act' for short) the rates at which the duties are leviable on imported goods are specified in the … not refer to other notifications issued under Chapter 98 only but referred to any other notification issued under Chapter 1 to 98 of the C.T.A. In the light of the decisions of the Apex Court in these two

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

21 of the SEZ Rules, 2006, it was also clarified that the provisions of Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 were inapplicable for the purpose of levying export duty for the aforesaid movement of goods, as such movement … Section 2(27) to include the territorial waters of India. Mr. Champaneri further submitted that Section 12 contained in Chapter V of the said Act provides that except as otherwise provided in the said Act, or any other … to SEZ units under LUT/Bond and/ or rebate.3. Special Civil Application Nos. 11032 & 9806 of 2008 are filed by SEZ Developers and remaining 8

Collector of Customs, Madras Vs. Kotumal Bhirumal Pihlajani and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 107, 108 and 135; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 23(1)(A) and 23(B); Defence of India Rules - Rule 131-B; Evidence Act - Sections 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 5(2), 161 and 162; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Sea Customs Act - Sections 171-A

Reported in : AIR1967Mad263; 1967CriLJ1007

Customs, Madras against ten persons for offences under Section 120-B I.P.C. (conspiracy) read with Section 135 of the Customs Act 1962 (Central) Act 52 of 1962 (concerning smuggling of prohibited goods including possession knowing or having reason to believe … the Collector of Customs, Madras against ten persons for offences under Section 120-B I.P.C. (conspiracy) read with Section 135 of the Customs Act 1962 (Central) … or empowered also by a special provision to exercise the powers of investigation conferred on police officers in Chapter XIV of the Crl, P. C. The decision given on this question has arisen in the context of

Hindustan Electronics (Gem Vs. Collector of Customs and Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Miscellaneous

Reported in : (1987)(31)ELT252TriDel

is on the Revenue and not on the appellant because notifications were issued under Section 11C of the Customs Act, 1962 (Chapter IV) and there are no corresponding notifications or amendment of law under Section 123 of the Customs Act, … 1. M/s. Hindustan Electronics has filed an appeal being aggrieved from order passed by the Additional Collector of Customs

Sva Udyog Viniyog Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 2(33), 46, 47, 111 and 112

Reported in : 1991(52)ELT212(Bom)

should not be taken against them and the goods confiscated under Section 112 and Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Petitioners, by their letter dated 7-7-1988, replied to the said Show Cause Notices. In the said reply, … Shri Taleyarkhan will not help his case for the reason that groundnut and rapeseeds have been covered under Chapter 12, clause 1202.10 and clause 1205.00 of the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Almonds, however, … should not be taken against them and the goods confiscated under Section 112 and Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Petitioners, by their