Advanced Search Results

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal Vs. Usha ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 350 and 549(1); Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 8(3-A) and 11-A; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 122

Reported in : AIR1986SC1655; 1986CriLJ1248; 1986(3)Crimes11(SC); 1986(1)SCALE931; 1986Supp(1)SCC190; [1986]3SCR113

regard to a trial before a Special Judge. It was presumably on account of this decision that the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act of 1952 was amended by incorporating Sections 8(3A) and 11, reading as under:Section 8(3A) : In … virtue of Central Act XXII of 1966. Having regard to the provision contained in Section 8(3A) of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act of 1952 as it now stands it is clear that a Special Judge is deemed to

Damodar Ganesh and ors. Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932 - Sections 1, 7 and 7(1); Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1), 19(3), 19(4) and 19(5); Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1935; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6A; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 67B(2)

Reported in : AIR1951Bom459; (1951)53BOMLR739; 1953CriLJ37

No. 704 of 1950 have been made by petitioners who have been convicted under Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act XXIII [23] of 1932. 2. The facts in all cases are almost identical, and there is … to work. Thereupon, all these petitioners were arrested for having committed an offence under Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1932. All of them were put up for trial before the learned Presidency Magistrate, 4th

Harkirat Singh Ghuman Vs. Punjab And Haryana High Court

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

marks in each paper for qualifying for viva­voce is contrary to the Scheme of Rules; (ii) Paper V (Criminal Law) was of 200 marks but at the commencement of the examination, the question paper handed over to the … given for answering the additional question and this was one of the manifest procedural defect in Paper V (Criminal Law) and has caused grave prejudice to the appellant. (iii) Despite repeated demands, the respondents have failed to provide

State of West Bengal Vs. Sadan K. Bormal and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : West Bengal Criminal Law (Amendment) (Special Courts) Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 2(2), 3(1) and 9(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5 and 5A; Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 5 to 10, 26, 26A, 26A(1), 26A(2) and 30; West Bengal Criminal Law (Amendment) (Special Courts) Amending Act, 1953; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; West Bengal Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 2 and 4

Reported in : AIR2004SC3666; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)333; 2004CriLJ3034; 2004(5)SCALE249; (2004)6SCC59

criminal proceedings against the respondents herein holding that the 3rd Special Court, Calcutta appointed under the West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1949 for trying offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short Act … was transferred to the Court of the 3rd Special Judge, Calcutta, a Court empowered under the West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1949 to try offences under the Act of 1947. The 3rd Special Judge took

In Re: Swami Arunagirinathar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1939Mad21; (1938)2MLJ863

Leach, C.J.1. The appellant in this case has been convicted on three charges under Section 7(1)(a) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, read with Section 117 of the Indian Penal Code, and has been sentenced on each … with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine or with both. The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, added, to the list of crimes what is now known as 'picketing'. It is not

Haresh Mahadeo Kamble and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 154, 323 and 376(2)

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1297

16-11-1993.31. Principal object of the FIR is only to make the complaint to the police and set the criminal law into motion. Its second object though equally important is to obtain early information of alleged criminal activity to … it is about rape of Rambha by 5-6 persons but if object of the FIR is to set criminal law into motion then that entry was not at all sufficient to set criminal law into motion because police

Pratik Sarkar, Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1998 - Sections 173 and 239; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1908 - Sections 15(2), 16, 17 and 17(1); Evidence Act - Sections 25 and 26; Bihar Re-organisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 35, 84 and 85

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR660

Criminal Procedure was rejected with a direction to the petitioners to stand charge under Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908.2. Prosecution story, in short, was that the police party, on tip off, headed by a … No. 10 of 2003 was instituted against all the petitioners for the offence under Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908.3. Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned Sr. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr.

P.V. Narsimha Rao Vs. State (Cbi/Spe)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Privileges of Parliament Act, 1512; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 108, 164, 173(8), 190, 193, 195 to 197 and 306; Constitution of India - Articles 1(6), 13(2), 19(1), 21, 32, 84, 99, 101, 102, 103, 105(2), 150, 160, 167, 168, 170, 172, 173, 190, 191, 192, 194, 211, 226, 246, 324 and 329; Constitution of India (forty fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 15; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 19(1); People Act, 1951; Salary, Allowances and Pension of Members of Parliament Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6(2), 6-A(2) and 8A(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 2, 5, 8, 9, 12, 21, 120B, 161-A, 164 and 193; Crimes Act, 1914 - Sections 73A; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 5(2); Prevention of Corruption Act,

Reported in : AIR1998SC2120; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)157; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)762; 1997(1)BLJR263; 1998CriLJ2930; 1998(3)SCALE53; (1998)4SCC626; [1998]2SCR870

of his Parliamentary activities'. The Report speaks (in para 309) of 'the historical circumstances in which the ordinary criminal law has not applied to bribery in respect of proceedings in Parliament'. It finds (in para 310) that 'the … of Parliament would be immune from effective punitive sanctions of the kind that can be inflicted under the criminal law. Public obloquy is unlikely to be an effective sanction against such a person and accordingly we consider that

Sunil Kumar Bose and ors. Vs. the Chief Secretary to the Government of ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 19(1), 19(5), 22(2), 22(4), 22(7), 372, 372(1), 372(2) and 373; ;Bengal Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1930 - Section 2 and 2(1); ;Criminal Law Amendment (Amending) Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 2(1) and 22; ;Preventive Detention (Extension of Duration) Order, 1950; ;Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950 - Rule 28; ;West Bengal Security Ordinance, 1949 - Section 22

Reported in : 54CWN394

issued in respect of 381 persons 370 of whom are under detention by orders passed under the Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1930, as amended by the Criminal Law Amendment (Amending Ordinance, 1949) and two of whom, namely, … are under detention by orders passed under the Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1930, as amended by the Criminal Law Amendment (Amending Ordinance, 1949) and two of whom, namely, Purna Chandra Ghose and Dulal Bose; are under detention

Present: Mr. Sumeet Mahajan Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

has been produced by Mr.Patwalia as Annexure A-1. In the representation (Annexure A-2).respondent No.4 submitted that marks of Criminal Law (Paper-III) have not been mentioned and counted in the total marks and that his performance in all the … all the written papers was almost identical. It is contended that if the marks obtained by him in Criminal Law (Paper-III) are counted in the total marks, then he become senior to many Judicial Officers of his batch.