Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coroners act 1871 section 40 · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 06 1958

P. Rajangam, Sub-inspector of Police and ors. Vs. State of Madras and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-06-1958

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5, 156 to 173, 176 and 190; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20, 20(3), 21, 22 and 226; Madras Revenue Enquiries Act, 1893 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1959Mad294; 1959CriLJ856

of East India Co., Act, 1793, 33 Geo. III, Ch. 52.Coroners appointed for Cities of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras.Coroners Act IV of 1871 Do amended by ActX of 1881. Applied to the three Presidency Towns.Criminal Procedure Codes.186118721882Section (1) … of Madras."Act V of 1889.Abolished office of Coroner of Madras, by omitting "Madras" in Coroners Act IV of 1871.Section 4-2 clauses :(1)repealed Cl. (e) of section 1 of Criminal Procedure Code 1882 (2)."Sections 174, 175 and 176 … Public (G1-A) Department, dated the 19th October, 1958.2. G. O. Ms. No. 409, Public (General-A) Department, dated the 22nd March 1954. Read the following:--1. From

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1926

In Re: Umar Sobani

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-11-1926

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1927Bom163; (1927)29BOMLR196

justify our interference.18. I, therefore, agree with the order proposed, by my learned brother. Coroner's Act (IV of 1871), Section 29-Coroner-Inquisition-Verdict of jury-Coroner not agreeing with the verdict-Reference to the High Court-Application to High Court by a party … they are, all and every of them, hereby appointed to be Justices and Conservators of the Peace, and Coroners, within and throughout the Settlement of Bombay, and the Town and Island of Bombay, and the Limits thereof,... … Vol. VIII, at p. 285, namely, R. v. Wood (1908) 73 J.P. 40. In that case it was held that 'an inquisition may be quashed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 1999

Chicago Vs. Morales

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-10-1999

Subject : Land Acquisition

Department of the City of New York, Rule 414 (emphasis added). See also J. Crocker, Duties of Sheriffs, Coroners and Constables § 48, p. 33 (2d ed. rev. 1871) ("Sheriffs are, ex officio, conservators of the peace … ordinance's loitering definition-"to remain in anyone place with no apparent purpose"-as giving officers absolute discretion to determine what activities constitute loitering. See id., at 359. This Court has no authority to construe the language of a state … does not promptly obey such an order is in violation of this section. "(b) It shall be an affirmative defense to an alleged violation of … is permitted, it is impermissibly vague. See, e. g., Coates v. Cincinnati, 402 U. S. 611 , 614. The term "loiter" may have a common

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 14 1984

Pulliam Vs. Allen

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-14-1984

Subject : MRTP

and declaratory relief under § 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and from fee awards made under … generally Dobbs, The Decline of Jurisdiction by Consent, 40 N.C.L.Rev. 49, 60-61 (1961). The writs were particularly … county court, an inferior court of record; reliance placed on precedent extending immunity to the court of a coroner and to a courtmartial, an inferior court and a court not of record); Haggard v. Pelicer Freres [1892] … and when respondents were unable to meet the bail, petitioner committed them to jail. Subsequently, respondents brought an action against petitioner in Federal District Court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that petitioner's practice of imposing bail … for alleged violations of Va.Code § 18.2-388 (1982), being drunk in public. Section 18.2-388 is a Class 4 misdemeanor for which the maximum penalty is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1960

State Vs. Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 75(2), 93 and 307; Constitution of India - Articles 72, 161 and 361; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(12), 53(16), 81(1), 82(10), 89(3), 122, 123, and 146; Supreme Court Rules - Order 21, Rule 5

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR383; 1960CriLJ1558

after, forgiveth any crime, offence, punishment, execution, right, title, debt or duty, temporal or ecclesiastcal. And the King's coronation oath is, 'that he will cause justice to be executed in mercy'.'The sovereign also enjoys the power to … not been executed for good and valid reasons. For this purpose it is necessary to decide whether the action takoen by the Governor is within the law. We therefore informed the Advicate General and the other counsel … Reference No. 159 of 1959, which was made to this Court under Section 307 Cr. P. C. by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, a Division … view in G. D. Karkarey v. T. L. Shevde, ILR 1952 Nag 409 : AIR 1952 Nag 330 it was observed:'We connot accede to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial