Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coroners act 1871 section 36 · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.018 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 04 1969

Tanajirao Martinrao Kadambande Vs. H.J. Chinoy

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1969)71BOMLR732

holding an Inquest into the death of the deceased Roma Kadambande in accordance with the provisions of the Coroners Act, 1871 (Act No. IV of 1871) and at the said Inquest the police or the State of Maharashtra (respondent … 'judicial proceeding' given by Mayne. In Queen-Empress v. Tulja I.L.R. (1887) Bom. 36 though this Court was principally concerned with the question as to whether … that the Inquest proceedings before respondent No. 1 were governed by the Indian Evidence Act and that under Section 137 of the said Act an adverse party alone had the right to cross-examine and therefore respondent No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1958

P. Rajangam, Sub-inspector of Police and ors. Vs. State of Madras and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-06-1958

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5, 156 to 173, 176 and 190; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20, 20(3), 21, 22 and 226; Madras Revenue Enquiries Act, 1893 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1959Mad294; 1959CriLJ856

of East India Co., Act, 1793, 33 Geo. III, Ch. 52.Coroners appointed for Cities of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras.Coroners Act IV of 1871 Do amended by ActX of 1881. Applied to the three Presidency Towns.Criminal Procedure Codes.186118721882Section (1) … of Madras."Act V of 1889.Abolished office of Coroner of Madras, by omitting "Madras" in Coroners Act IV of 1871.Section 4-2 clauses :(1)repealed Cl. (e) of section 1 of Criminal Procedure Code 1882 (2)."Sections 174, 175 and 176 … inquiry as nearly as may be in the manner prescribed in Section 362.(2) Whenever the Commissioner of Police or a Presidency Magistrate considers it expedient

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1980

Owen Vs. City of Independence

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-16-1980

Subject : Land Acquisition

surrounding the passage of § 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 17 Stat. 13 -- the forerunner of § 1983 -- confirm the … 681 . Damages actions against municipalities for federal statutory violations were also entertained. See, e.g., 69 U. S. Coroner, 2 Wall. 501 (1865); Corporation of New York v. Ransom, 23 How. 487 (1860); Bliss v. Brooklyn, 3 … turned over to the prosecutor for presentation to the grand jury and that the City Manager take appropriate action against the persons involved in the wrongful activities brought out in the investigative reports, the City Manager discharged … his employment as Chief of Police was "[t]erminated under the provisions of Section 3.3(1) of the City Charter." [ Footnote 7 ] Petitioner's earlier demand … U. S. 658 (1978), overruled Monroe v. Pape, 365 U. S. 167 (1961), insofar as Monroe held

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 10 1999

Chicago Vs. Morales

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-10-1999

Subject : Land Acquisition

Department of the City of New York, Rule 414 (emphasis added). See also J. Crocker, Duties of Sheriffs, Coroners and Constables § 48, p. 33 (2d ed. rev. 1871) ("Sheriffs are, ex officio, conservators of the peace … ordinance's loitering definition-"to remain in anyone place with no apparent purpose"-as giving officers absolute discretion to determine what activities constitute loitering. See id., at 359. This Court has no authority to construe the language of a state … does not promptly obey such an order is in violation of this section. "(b) It shall be an affirmative defense to an alleged violation of … the policeman on his beat." Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U. S., at 360 (internal quotation marks omitted). As we discussed in the context of fair

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2009

Ramlath Vs. Nasar and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-07-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 132; Coroners Act - Sections 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 489B, 489C, 498B and 498C; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 240, 319 and 342

Reported in : 2010CriLJ80; 2009(3)KLJ214

which was taken away by Section 32 of Act 2 of 1855. The effect of Section 19 of Coroners' Act (4 of 1871) and Section 342 of the Criminal Procedure Code (old) came for consideration in Emperor v. … only when witness objected to the question. Tudball, J. held in Emperor v. Chatur Singh AIR 1931 All 36 that, although a voluntary statement made by a witness might stand on a different footing, an answer given

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial