Advanced Search Results
Tanajirao Martinrao Kadambande Vs. H.J. Chinoy
Mumbai
Feb-04-1969
Criminal
(1969)71BOMLR732
holding an Inquest into the death of the deceased Roma Kadambande in accordance with the provisions of the Coroners Act, 1871 (Act No. IV of 1871) and at the said Inquest the police or the State of Maharashtra (respondent … 'judicial proceeding' given by Mayne. In Queen-Empress v. Tulja I.L.R. (1887) Bom. 36 though this Court was principally concerned with the question as to whether … that the Inquest proceedings before respondent No. 1 were governed by the Indian Evidence Act and that under Section 137 of the said Act an adverse party alone had the right to cross-examine and therefore respondent No.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Rajangam, Sub-inspector of Police and ors. Vs. State of Madras and ...
Chennai
Aug-06-1958
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5, 156 to 173, 176 and 190; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20, 20(3), 21, 22 and 226; Madras Revenue Enquiries Act, 1893 - Sections 2
AIR1959Mad294; 1959CriLJ856
of East India Co., Act, 1793, 33 Geo. III, Ch. 52.Coroners appointed for Cities of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras.Coroners Act IV of 1871 Do amended by ActX of 1881. Applied to the three Presidency Towns.Criminal Procedure Codes.186118721882Section (1) … of Madras."Act V of 1889.Abolished office of Coroner of Madras, by omitting "Madras" in Coroners Act IV of 1871.Section 4-2 clauses :(1)repealed Cl. (e) of section 1 of Criminal Procedure Code 1882 (2)."Sections 174, 175 and 176 … inquiry as nearly as may be in the manner prescribed in Section 362.(2) Whenever the Commissioner of Police or a Presidency Magistrate considers it expedient
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOwen Vs. City of Independence
US Supreme Court
Apr-16-1980
Land Acquisition
surrounding the passage of § 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 17 Stat. 13 -- the forerunner of § 1983 -- confirm the … 681 . Damages actions against municipalities for federal statutory violations were also entertained. See, e.g., 69 U. S. Coroner, 2 Wall. 501 (1865); Corporation of New York v. Ransom, 23 How. 487 (1860); Bliss v. Brooklyn, 3 … turned over to the prosecutor for presentation to the grand jury and that the City Manager take appropriate action against the persons involved in the wrongful activities brought out in the investigative reports, the City Manager discharged … his employment as Chief of Police was "[t]erminated under the provisions of Section 3.3(1) of the City Charter." [ Footnote 7 ] Petitioner's earlier demand … U. S. 658 (1978), overruled Monroe v. Pape, 365 U. S. 167 (1961), insofar as Monroe held
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chicago Vs. Morales
US Supreme Court
Jun-10-1999
Land Acquisition
Department of the City of New York, Rule 414 (emphasis added). See also J. Crocker, Duties of Sheriffs, Coroners and Constables § 48, p. 33 (2d ed. rev. 1871) ("Sheriffs are, ex officio, conservators of the peace … ordinance's loitering definition-"to remain in anyone place with no apparent purpose"-as giving officers absolute discretion to determine what activities constitute loitering. See id., at 359. This Court has no authority to construe the language of a state … does not promptly obey such an order is in violation of this section. "(b) It shall be an affirmative defense to an alleged violation of … the policeman on his beat." Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U. S., at 360 (internal quotation marks omitted). As we discussed in the context of fair
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamlath Vs. Nasar and ors.
Kerala
Jul-07-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 132; Coroners Act - Sections 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 489B, 489C, 498B and 498C; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 240, 319 and 342
2010CriLJ80; 2009(3)KLJ214
which was taken away by Section 32 of Act 2 of 1855. The effect of Section 19 of Coroners' Act (4 of 1871) and Section 342 of the Criminal Procedure Code (old) came for consideration in Emperor v. … only when witness objected to the question. Tudball, J. held in Emperor v. Chatur Singh AIR 1931 All 36 that, although a voluntary statement made by a witness might stand on a different footing, an answer given
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›