Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: copyright amendment act 2012 central section 6 · Page 1 of about 210 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 30 2018

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-30-2018

Subject : MRTP

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … as a result of which the TRAI Act was extended to broadcasting services which were undefined. By a Central Government notification dated 9.1.2004, the TRAI Act was expressly extended to broadcasting services, and certain functions were allocated … The scope of the amendments made in the year 2012 along with Section 37 was correctly dealt with. This Court is of the view that … not in conformity with the parent Act / plenary Act. Therefore, clauses 6(1), second proviso to 6(1), proviso to 7(2), 7(4), first proviso to 7(4)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2019

Novex Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs.lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);or (iii) a body corporate established by or under any Central, Provincial or State Act; (e) in the case of a work to which the provisions of section 41 … embodying the same sound recording, made by any means; RFA No.18/2019 Page 6 of 33 (iv) in relation to a programme or performance in which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2017

Phonographic Performance Ltd vs.ht Media Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-2017

Subject : Education

on account 3. of subsequent events, which are indicated hereunder.4. The Act was amended by virtue of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 and by virtue of Section 33(3A) of the Act, which came into effect on 20.06.2012, read with the … that it had made an application for such registration on 09.05.2013. However, no orders were passed by the Central Government in respect of its application and, consequently, the plaintiff’s registration as a Copyright Society lapsed. It is … had filed the aforementioned suit as a CS(OS) 2749/2011 Page 1 of 6 Copyright Society registered under Section 33(3) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 2012

India Tv Independent News Service Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Yashraj Fil ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 52 of the Copyright Act 1957 as it stood when the dispute arose i.e. prior to the Copyright Amendment Act 2012, she would be denuded from using excerpts of her performance for all times to come? Prima facie, the … a friend to show another friend, or of a favourite cartoon to post on the refrigerator. Parents in Central Park photograph their children perched on Jose De Creeft‟s Alice in Wonderland sculpture. We record television programmes aired … by highlighting the opinion in the decision reported as 401 F. 3d 647 (6th Cir. 2004) Bridgeport Music Inc v. Dimension Films in which the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2016

The Indian Singers Rights Association Vs. Night Fever Club and Lounge

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-30-2016

Subject : Right to Information

is the first copyright Society to be registered by the Central Government on June 14, 2013, after the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 came into force on June 21, 2012 for protection of Performer sRights described under Section 38 of the … V. Kameswar Rao, J. I.A. No. 15/2016 (under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC) This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 6

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2013

Ags Entertainment Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-26-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

generated from ".temporary transfer or permitting the use or enjoyment". of, any copyright as defined in the Copyright Act, 1957(14 of 1957) except the rights … attention to the brief history of levy of tax on films and historical background of the Constitution 46th Amendment Act, 1982 inserting Clause (29A) to Article 366 of the Constitution to impose tax on the transfer of right … proposed to exempt the Industry from service tax on Copyrights relating to recording of Cinematograph films. The Finance Act, 2012 introduced Section 66B as the new Charging Section with effect from 1.7.2012 for the levy of service tax … Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 2.The Central Board of Excise and Customs, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 3.The Commissioner … 2947, 3144, 4904, 5777, 5900, 5902, 5904, 5906, 6220, 31291 of 2012 1676, 1777, 3362, 6575, 15259,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2021

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-2021

Subject : Direct Taxation

submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also not … what was in fact transferred in the transaction between the parties was copyright which attracted the payment of royalty and thus, it was required that … section 9(1)(vi). Further, he referred to Circular No.10/2002 dated 09.10.2002 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [“CBDT”]. in which “remittance for royalties” and “remittance … : Provided that, in the case of a person not ordinarily resident in India within the meaning of sub-section (6) of section 6, the income which accrues or arises to him outside India shall not be so included

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2015

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-07-2015

Subject : Education

2959/2013 are filed questioning the vires of the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, as amended by the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012, (Act No.27 of 2012), namely, Section 11, Section 31(1)(b) and Section 31D as well as Rules 3(2), 7, … the Copyright Act. By order dated 25.02.2015, the High Court of Calcutta passed an interim order directing the Central Government to give at least 10 daysnotice to the petitioners therein of the constitution of the Copyright Board … be entertained and the same are liable to be dismissed in limine. 6. While bringing to the notice of this Court that Transfer Petitions (C)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2012

Vodafone India Limited Vs. M/S. R.K. Productions Pvt. Ltd and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-30-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(5)LW626

Matched in: Citation 2012(5)LW626

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2015

Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State Information Commissioner and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-30-2015

Subject : Right to Information

the petitioner. The plans are the artistic work as defined under the Copyrights Act, 1957. The petitioner being the owner of the copyright the disclosure … conjectures inasmuch as in paragraph 8.11 the 1st respondent has relied upon the Maharashtra Housing (Regulation and Development) Act, 2012 which had not come into force on the date of the order. As also the observation of the … of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the state Public Information … allowed directing the 2nd respondent to provide information to the 3rd respondent as per his application made under Section 6 of the Act. In a nutshell the facts are: 2. The 3rd respondent is stated to be the … the certified copies of the property card, certified copies of plans and amendments to the plans as submitted by the petitioner or its architects, certified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial