Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: copyright amendment act 2012 central section 5 · Page 1 of about 217 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 21 2012

India Tv Independent News Service Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Yashraj Fil ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 52 of the Copyright Act 1957 as it stood when the dispute arose i.e. prior to the Copyright Amendment Act 2012, she would be denuded from using excerpts of her performance for all times to come? Prima facie, the … a friend to show another friend, or of a favourite cartoon to post on the refrigerator. Parents in Central Park photograph their children perched on Jose De Creeft‟s Alice in Wonderland sculpture. We record television programmes aired … stanzas from nine songs; seven of which were from different cinematographic films. 5. In a nutshell, the learned Single Judge has held that other than

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2018

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-30-2018

Subject : MRTP

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … TRAI Act was extended to broadcasting services which were undefined. By a Central Government notification dated 9.1.2004, the TRAI Act was expressly extended to broadcasting … beamed by a person other than the broadcaster, a licence under Section 4 of the Telegraph Act and Section 5 of the Wireless Telegraphy Act is a sine qua non for operating a teleport and that therefore it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2019

Novex Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs.lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);or (iii) a body corporate established by or under any Central, Provincial or State Act; (e) in the case of a work to which the provisions of section 41 … licenses from the appellant/plaintiff. The appellant/plaintiff has also claimed damages of Rs. 5,00,000/- on account of infringement by the respondent No.1/defendant No.1 of the copyright

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 27 2013

Asha Audio Co. and anr. Vs. Om Prakash Sonik

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-27-2013

Subject : Education

prayed for. The learned Judge passed the interim order on June 20, 2013. On June 21, 2012 the Copyright (Amendment) Act 2012 came into force by which Section 33 (3A).second proviso came into existence that would require all copyright societies … been raised against the society. In effect, it was rather an attempt to stall the measures that the Central Government had started taking against the society. LIS: In this backdrop, let us now decide on the present … fiRs.date. The remarks at two places in the judgment, i.e, at page 5 where the learned Judge observed, “petitioner was not espousing his individual right

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2016

The Indian Singers Rights Association Vs. Night Fever Club and Lounge

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-30-2016

Subject : Right to Information

is the first copyright Society to be registered by the Central Government on June 14, 2013, after the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 came into force on June 21, 2012 for protection of Performer sRights described under Section 38 of the … guarantees Performers a special right in respect of their performances. The term of such Performer s Right is 50 years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the performance is made.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2017

Phonographic Performance Ltd vs.ht Media Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-2017

Subject : Education

on account 3. of subsequent events, which are indicated hereunder.4. The Act was amended by virtue of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 and by virtue of Section 33(3A) of the Act, which came into effect on 20.06.2012, read with the … that it had made an application for such registration on 09.05.2013. However, no orders were passed by the Central Government in respect of its application and, consequently, the plaintiff’s registration as a Copyright Society lapsed. It is … be filed within a period of two weeks thereafter. CS(OS) 2749/2011 Page 5 of 6 List before the Joint Registrar on 01.03.2017 for completion of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2014

Vodafone South Limited and Another Vs. the Deputy Director of Income T ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-20-2014

Subject : Education

more on this aspect which would have been possible had the petitioner questioned the legality of the Finance Act, 2012, inserting Explanations 5 and 6 to Section 9(l)(vi) of the Act. 47. I need to emphasize that the … Payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of a literary, artistic or scientific work, including cinematography films or work on films, tape or other means … comes within the mischief of any of the Explanations. He submits, the amendment is effected to spell out that it is 'Royalty' and retrospective effect … tax assessee in India and NTO based on foreign policy of the Central Government, agreements are entered into to prevent double taxation, and they are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2014

Vodafone South Limited and Another Vs. the Deputy Director of Income T ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-20-2014

Subject : Education

more on this aspect which would have been possible had the petitioner questioned the legality of the Finance Act, 2012, inserting Explanations 5 and 6 to Section 9(l)(vi) of the Act. 47. I need to emphasize that the … Payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of a literary, artistic or scientific work, including cinematography films or work on films, tape or other means … comes within the mischief of any of the Explanations. He submits, the amendment is effected to spell out that it is 'Royalty' and retrospective effect … tax assessee in India and NTO based on foreign policy of the Central Government, agreements are entered into to prevent double taxation, and they are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2013

Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-26-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

effect to the said circular.2. When service tax was levied on ".intellectual property services". with effect from 10.9.2004, copyright was specifically excluded from the definition of intellectual property rights. Normally, a producer of a movie sells the … No.148/17/2011-ST alone becomes otiose and in this context the impugned circular is liable to be quashed.46. The Finance Act, 2012 has completely revamped the service tax regime. Under the new service tax regime, as per Section 66D, all … its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), … 1116, 2137, 2643, 2648, 2946, 3948, 3949, 4903, 5899, 5901, 5903, 5905, 6219 and 11346 of 2012 … ".licensing of copyrights". was brought within the service tax net by making amendments to the definition of taxable service under Clause (105) of Section 65

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2021

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-2021

Subject : Direct Taxation

submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also not … what was in fact transferred in the transaction between the parties was copyright which attracted the payment of royalty and thus, it was required that … section 9(1)(vi). Further, he referred to Circular No.10/2002 dated 09.10.2002 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [“CBDT”]. in which “remittance for royalties” and “remittance … deducted at source or paid in advance, depending upon the provisions of the Income Tax Act. Importantly, under section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act, the total income of a person who is a non-resident, includes all income

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial