Advanced Search Results

Act1: copyright amendment act 2012 central section 21 · Page 1 of about 72 results (0.049 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Sep 27 2013

Asha Audio Co. and anr. Vs. Om Prakash Sonik

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-27-2013

Subject : Education

prayed for. The learned Judge passed the interim order on June 20, 2013. On June 21, 2012 the Copyright (Amendment) Act 2012 came into force by which Section 33 (3A).second proviso came into existence that would require all copyright societies … been raised against the society. In effect, it was rather an attempt to stall the measures that the Central Government had started taking against the society. LIS: In this backdrop, let us now decide on the present

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2016

The Indian Singers Rights Association Vs. Night Fever Club and Lounge

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-30-2016

Subject : Right to Information

is the first copyright Society to be registered by the Central Government on June 14, 2013, after the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 came into force on June 21, 2012 for protection of Performer sRights described under Section 38 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2019

Novex Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs.lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … copyright could/can take away from himself the right of RFA No.18/2019 Page 21 of 33 granting licenses i.e. thereby not being able to grant any … 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);or (iii) a body corporate established by or under any Central, Provincial or State Act; (e) in the case of a work to which the provisions of section 41

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Oct 30 2018

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-30-2018

Subject : MRTP

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … as a result of which the TRAI Act was extended to broadcasting services which were undefined. By a Central Government notification dated 9.1.2004, the TRAI Act was expressly extended to broadcasting services, and certain functions were allocated … The scope of the amendments made in the year 2012 along with Section 37 was correctly dealt with. This Court is of the view that … that these benefits could not possibly be denied by the broadcasters. In 21 addition, the selfsame broadcasters have been regulated throughout and are raising questions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2016

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-23-2016

Subject : Right to Information

kind that the appellant wilfully stores, i.e. entire content permanently.29. SCIL relied on the Standing Committee report on copyright amendment, which had excluded only ISPs from absolute liability. Websites such as MySpace, that host content are protected only … that the amendment to the Copyright Act, w.e.f 21.06.2012 took note of the challenges faced by intermediaries … This court is conscious that a significant amendment to this provision took place in 2008; the Information Technology Amendment Act was brought into force on 5 February, 2009. However, that amendment brought in greater clarity to the nature … or attributed knowledge. Intervenor‘s Arguments 25. An intervenor‟s application C.M. No 3095/ 2012 was moved by Centre for Internet and Society, an independent, non-profit research … duties under this Act and also observes such other guidelines as the Central Government may prescribe in this behalf. (3) The provisions of sub-section (1)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2015

Sartaj Singh Pannu Vs. Gurbani Media Pvt Ltd and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-2015

Subject : Service Tax

The Court has further concluded that the question whether for the purposes of Section 2 (v) of the Copyright Act, 1962 (CR Act), a Director of a film could be considered an „author‟ of an „artistic work‟ … of an author, which were independent of the rights of commercial exploitation. The failed attempt at introducing an amendment to Section 2 (d) (v) of the CR Act in 2010 to include a director as a joint … fact that although Pannu began shooting the film as Director since October 2012, it was only in January 2013 that the agreement was executed. According … for the Respondents tendered a copy of the certificate issued by the Central Board of Film Certification („CBFC‟) dated 13th March 2015 for the film … film. He also issued a legal notice on 21st September 2014 to various distributors and marketing agents

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2015

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-07-2015

Subject : Education

2959/2013 are filed questioning the vires of the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, as amended by the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012, (Act No.27 of 2012), namely, Section 11, Section 31(1)(b) and Section 31D as well as Rules 3(2), 7, … the Copyright Act. By order dated 25.02.2015, the High Court of Calcutta passed an interim order directing the Central Government to give at least 10 daysnotice to the petitioners therein of the constitution of the Copyright Board … partition or partnership where the competing rights of the defendants are involved. 21. It may also be added that under Rule 1(3) of Order 23

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2015

Ravi Dev Gupta Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-04-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

also undergone an amendment by virtue of Act 21 of 2011 with retrospective effect from 25.10.2011. Though … retrospective effect from 25.10.2011 and earlier the expression “cable operator” was defined under Section 2(aa). However, the said amendment is not a matter of much concern insofar as the present group of cases is concerned.13. The most … entered into a Media Rights Agreement with BCCI with effect from April 2012 which would continue upto 31.03.2018. ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd is responsible … prayed that Notification dated 03.07.2007 issued by the Central Government and the Notification dated 19.10.2007 issued by … which the court could not interfere. He, however, observed that if non-encryption resulted in the violation of any copyrights, which the appellants held as content owners, they were free to seek redressal. The learned single Judge, however, … Prasar Bharati under the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharati) Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as „the Sports Act‟). A declaration was also