Advanced Search Results

Novex Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs.lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … right of the author in the work referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 13. Section 18 18. Assignment of copyright.- (1) The owner of the copyright in an existing work or the prospective owner … (1 of 1956);or (iii) a body corporate established by or under any Central, Provincial or State Act; (e) in the case of a work to

The Indian Singers Rights Association Vs. Night Fever Club and Lounge

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

is the first copyright Society to be registered by the Central Government on June 14, 2013, after the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 came into force on June 21, 2012 for protection of Performer sRights described under Section 38 of the … the performance at the first instance [Section 38A (1)(b)]. He would also state fourth and third provisos of Section 18 (1) read with Section 39A grant the performers an ill-alienable Right to Receive Royalty for utilization of their

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … The proviso which was added by the Amendment Act of 2000 made 18 it clear that the time had come to include broadcasting services as … as a result of which the TRAI Act was extended to broadcasting services which were undefined. By a Central Government notification dated 9.1.2004, the TRAI Act was expressly extended to broadcasting services, and certain functions were allocated … The scope of the amendments made in the year 2012 along with Section 37 was correctly dealt with. This Court is of the view that

Ags Entertainment Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

been sold or given on hire on earlier occasions; (iii) to communicate the film to the public. 28. Section 18 defines Assignment. Section 18 deals with Assignment of copyright i.e., the owner of copyright in an existing work … attention to the brief history of levy of tax on films and historical background of the Constitution 46th Amendment Act, 1982 inserting Clause (29A) to Article 366 of the Constitution to impose tax on the transfer of right … proposed to exempt the Industry from service tax on Copyrights relating to recording of Cinematograph films. The Finance Act, 2012 introduced Section 66B as the new Charging Section with effect from 1.7.2012 for the levy of service tax … Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 2.The Central Board of Excise and Customs, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 3.The Commissioner

Roche Products (India) Pvt Ltd. and Others Vs. Drugs Controller Genera ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

The plaintiffs alleged that they became aware of the details of the inadequacy in the approval process and copyright violation subsequent to filing the suit (i.e. when defendant No. 2 filed additional documents and Bmab-200 was launched … subsequent events i.e. for discovery of documents, rejection of plaint, contempt petitions, amendment of plaint. The matter was heard from time to time wherein common … per averments, the plaintiff No. 2's Annual Reports for the years 2011, 2012 and 2013, the global sales for HERCEPTIN were as follows: YearSales in … No. 1, the Drug Controller General of India, Central Drugs Standard/Control Organization, Ministry of Health and Family … a declaration that a certain Settlement Agreement arrived at between Premier Automobiles Ltd. and the Association Union under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was not binding upon them and further for a permanent injunction restraining

The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of University of Oxford & O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

to have been cognizant of India’s obligations under the International Covenants while in the year 2012 incorporating the amendments to the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, and had allowed reproduction ‗in the course of instruction‘ by teachers and … each year or course of study containing facts and ideas around a central subject. Referring to a passage from the treatise The History of the … students to be photocopied. Anticipating that the defence would be predicated under Section 52(1)(i) of the Copyright Act, 1957, the plaintiffs have pleaded that Section … among the Historians and other Essays (682 pages; 18 pages copied constituting 2.63%; publisher Oxford University Press; … The respondents are the defendants. The dispute before the learned Single Judge concerned photocopying of pages from the copyrighted publications of the plaintiffs; namely (i) Oxford University Press; (ii) Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom; (iii) Cambridge University

Vodafone India Limited Vs. M/S. R.K. Productions Pvt. Ltd and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(5)LW626

Matched in: Citation 2012(5)LW626

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

2959/2013 are filed questioning the vires of the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, as amended by the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012, (Act No.27 of 2012), namely, Section 11, Section 31(1)(b) and Section 31D as well as Rules 3(2), 7, … the Copyright Act. By order dated 25.02.2015, the High Court of Calcutta passed an interim order directing the Central Government to give at least 10 daysnotice to the petitioners therein of the constitution of the Copyright Board … part of a claim, without the consent of the other plaintiffs. ? 18. A reading of Order 23 shows that under Rule 1(1) an absolute

T.Saikrishnan Vs. Narendran

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

44 It is also the stand of the respondent No.9 that as per the Cable TV Network (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2011, the entire cable TV Services in the country is to be digitized within a time frame i.e. … AT MADRAS DATED:31. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA O.A.No.1076 of 2012 in C.S.No.833 of 2012 T.SAIKRISHNAN S/O.THANDAPANI, PROP: M/S.SKYLINK COMMUNICATIONS, NO.65/4, KALI AMMAN … as per the law laid down by the Central Government in this regard. 4 It is the … before the learned single Judge. The decisions in both the said cases arose out of appeals filed under Section 18 of the Act against the orders of the Tribunal.The dispute in those cases were either between the Government … a personal, exclusive right vested with him like in the case of copyrights, movies, etc. which cannot be invoked in the present case, as the

M/S. A.V.R. Engineers Vs. Rajinder Singh and Another

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

The applicants are also the author, owner and proprietor of the artistic work within the meaning of the Copyright Act, 1957. 5. The applicant has been honestly, bonafidely and in the course of trade using the trade … CIRCUIT BENCH SITTING AT NEW DELHI ORDER (No.48 of 2012) S. Usha, Vice-Chairman: 1. The application for removal of the trade mark … secured all government registrations like Sales Tax Registration, Central Excise Registration, PAN Number, etc. The applicant is … to be the proprietor of the trade mark. The registration therefore is in contravention of the provision of Section 18 of the Act. 39. That apart, the respondents are not clear as to the date of user. In … respondent has not given any details as to any steps taken for amending the same by producing the necessary evidence. In that case, we are