Advanced Search Results

Novex Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs.lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … society subject to such conditions as may be prescribed: RFA No.18/2019 Page 12 of 33 Provided that the Central Government shall not ordinarily register more … 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);or (iii) a body corporate established by or under any Central, Provincial or State Act; (e) in the case of a work to which the provisions of section 41

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … as a result of which the TRAI Act was extended to broadcasting services which were undefined. By a Central Government notification dated 9.1.2004, the TRAI Act was expressly extended to broadcasting services, and certain functions were allocated … The scope of the amendments made in the year 2012 along with Section 37 was correctly dealt with. This Court is of the view that … “content” could certainly be regulated by TRAI under the Sports Act, but 12 only in the manner provided by that Act and from the stage

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also not … the Income Tax Act, found that what was in fact transferred in the transaction between the parties was copyright which attracted the payment of royalty and thus, it was required that tax be deducted at source by … section 9(1)(vi). Further, he referred to Circular No.10/2002 dated 09.10.2002 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [“CBDT”]. in which “remittance for royalties” and “remittance … 2002-2003.6. The Assessing Officer by an order dated 15.05.2002, after applying Article 12(3) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement [“DTAA”]., between India and USA, and

South Indian Music Companies Vs. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

was accordingly prescribed as per the rule making power available to the Central Government under Section 78(2) of the Copyright Act 1957. The rule also … constituted in consultation with Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) in accordance with DoPT OM dated 30.07.2007'' 8. Section 12 of the Act deals with the powers and procedure of the Copyright Board. Though the proviso to section … concerned, there is really no quibble that the State Legislature actually had the competence to carry out the amendment in view of the matter falling under Entry 42 of List-III of the VII Schedule, being the Concurrent … Limited Vs. Music Broadcast Private Limited, ((2012) 5 SCC 488 = AIR 2012 SC 2144), it has been held as follows: ''81. However, Section 31

Phonographic Performance Ltd vs.ht Media Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

on account 3. of subsequent events, which are indicated hereunder.4. The Act was amended by virtue of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 and by virtue of Section 33(3A) of the Act, which came into effect on 20.06.2012, read with the … that it had made an application for such registration on 09.05.2013. However, no orders were passed by the Central Government in respect of its application and, consequently, the plaintiff’s registration as a Copyright Society lapsed. It is … if it is not, the amendment will be refused" Indisputably, the amendments 12. the present application are necessary to bring out the real controversy between

Vodafone India Limited Vs. M/S. R.K. Productions Pvt. Ltd and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(5)LW626

Matched in: Citation 2012(5)LW626

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

2959/2013 are filed questioning the vires of the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, as amended by the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012, (Act No.27 of 2012), namely, Section 11, Section 31(1)(b) and Section 31D as well as Rules 3(2), 7, … the Copyright Act. By order dated 25.02.2015, the High Court of Calcutta passed an interim order directing the Central Government to give at least 10 daysnotice to the petitioners therein of the constitution of the Copyright Board … to decide the terms and conditions of the exploitation of his works. 12. Coming to the interveners, they are private broadcasters who have been granted

Board of Control for Cricket in India and Another Vs. Prasar Bharati, ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the expression “cable operator” was defined under Section 2(aa). However, the said amendment is not a matter of much concern insofar as the present group … entered into a Media Rights Agreement with BCCI with effect from April 2012 which would continue upto 31.03.2018. ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd is responsible … prayed that Notification dated 03.07.2007 issued by the Central Government and the Notification dated 19.10.2007 issued by … Section 3 thereof, Prasar Bharati was established as a corporation. Its functions and powers were spelt out in Section 12 thereof. Section 12(1) provides that “subject to the provisions of the Prasar Bharati Act, it shall be the … which the court could not interfere. He, however, observed that if non-encryption resulted in the violation of any copyrights, which the appellants held as content owners, they were free to seek redressal. The learned single Judge, however,

The Indian Singers Rights Association Vs. Night Fever Club and Lounge

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

is the first copyright Society to be registered by the Central Government on June 14, 2013, after the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 came into force on June 21, 2012 for protection of Performer sRights described under Section 38 of the … April 8, 2016 in ISRA v. Ashok Singh Ors. CM (COMM.) 356/2016 and order / judgment dated August 12, 2016 in CS (OS) 2608/2015 in ISRA v. Chapter 25, Bar and Restaurant (copy of order filed on

Ravi Dev Gupta Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the expression “cable operator” was defined under Section 2(aa). However, the said amendment is not a matter of much concern insofar as the present group … entered into a Media Rights Agreement with BCCI with effect from April 2012 which would continue upto 31.03.2018. ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd is responsible … prayed that Notification dated 03.07.2007 issued by the Central Government and the Notification dated 19.10.2007 issued by … Section 3 thereof, Prasar Bharati was established as a corporation. Its functions and powers were spelt out in Section 12 thereof. Section 12(1) provides that “subject to the provisions of the Prasar Bharati Act, it shall be the … which the court could not interfere. He, however, observed that if non-encryption resulted in the violation of any copyrights, which the appellants held as content owners, they were free to seek redressal. The learned single Judge, however,