Advanced Search Results

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … TRAI Act was extended to broadcasting services which were undefined. By a Central Government notification dated 9.1.2004, the TRAI Act was expressly extended to broadcasting … expressly extended to broadcasting services, and certain functions were allocated to TRAI in addition to those contained in Section 11(1)(a) of the TRAI Act, as also to specify norms and periodicity of revision of rates of pay channels.

Novex Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs.lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);or (iii) a body corporate established by or under any Central, Provincial or State Act; (e) in the case of a work to which the provisions of section 41 … RFA No.18/2019 & CM Nos. 786-789/2019 + % NOVEX COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD. 11th January, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with

India Tv Independent News Service Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Yashraj Fil ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 52 of the Copyright Act 1957 as it stood when the dispute arose i.e. prior to the Copyright Amendment Act 2012, she would be denuded from using excerpts of her performance for all times to come? Prima facie, the … a friend to show another friend, or of a favourite cartoon to post on the refrigerator. Parents in Central Park photograph their children perched on Jose De Creeft‟s Alice in Wonderland sculpture. We record television programmes aired … been decided by the learned Single Judge vide impugned order dated November 11, 2011. In the two appeals we are concerned with only two suits.

Asha Audio Co. and anr. Vs. Om Prakash Sonik

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

prayed for. The learned Judge passed the interim order on June 20, 2013. On June 21, 2012 the Copyright (Amendment) Act 2012 came into force by which Section 33 (3A).second proviso came into existence that would require all copyright societies … been raised against the society. In effect, it was rather an attempt to stall the measures that the Central Government had started taking against the society. LIS: In this backdrop, let us now decide on the present … : Mr.Shayan Roy Chowdhury, Advocate Ms.Sanchari Chakraborty, Advocate Heard on : September 11, 2013. Judgment on : September 27, 2013. ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE, J FACTS:

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also not … the Income Tax Act, found that what was in fact transferred in the transaction between the parties was copyright which attracted the payment of royalty and thus, it was required that tax be deducted at source by … section 9(1)(vi). Further, he referred to Circular No.10/2002 dated 09.10.2002 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes [“CBDT”]. in which “remittance for royalties” and “remittance … person responsible for paying such ‘sum’ to deduct tax thereon before making 11 payment. He has to discharge the obligation [to TDS]..” (emphasis supplied) If

Phonographic Performance Ltd vs.ht Media Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

on account 3. of subsequent events, which are indicated hereunder.4. The Act was amended by virtue of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 and by virtue of Section 33(3A) of the Act, which came into effect on 20.06.2012, read with the … that it had made an application for such registration on 09.05.2013. However, no orders were passed by the Central Government in respect of its application and, consequently, the plaintiff’s registration as a Copyright Society lapsed. It is … CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1502.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J I.A. 11095/2015 1. This is an application filed on behalf of the plaintiff under

Vodafone India Limited Vs. M/S. R.K. Productions Pvt. Ltd and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(5)LW626

Matched in: Citation 2012(5)LW626

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

2959/2013 are filed questioning the vires of the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, as amended by the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012, (Act No.27 of 2012), namely, Section 11, Section 31(1)(b) and Section 31D as well as Rules 3(2), 7, … the Copyright Act. By order dated 25.02.2015, the High Court of Calcutta passed an interim order directing the Central Government to give at least 10 daysnotice to the petitioners therein of the constitution of the Copyright Board

Kamlesh Kumar Jha & Ors. Vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

prefer the present petition.2. RC No.CY1 2009 E0006under Sections 405/418/420/4& 120B IPC read with Section 63 of the Copyright Act and 66B of the IT Act was registered on the complaint of Microsoft India Ltd. wherein a … by the Court of a Special Judge appointed CRL.M.C. 4035/2016 Page 3 of 7 under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 (46 of 1952 ); (b) any offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years or … a charge- sheet was filed before the learned ACMM. On 13th December, 2012 the learned ACMM recorded the statement of Krishna Kumar, one of the … Sethi, Advs. versus Represented by: Ms. Rajidipa Behura, Spl. PP. ..... Respondent CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1.

Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

effect to the said circular.2. When service tax was levied on ".intellectual property services". with effect from 10.9.2004, copyright was specifically excluded from the definition of intellectual property rights. Normally, a producer of a movie sells the … No.148/17/2011-ST alone becomes otiose and in this context the impugned circular is liable to be quashed.46. The Finance Act, 2012 has completely revamped the service tax regime. Under the new service tax regime, as per Section 66D, all … its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), … ".licensing of copyrights". was brought within the service tax net by making amendments to the definition of taxable service under Clause (105) of Section 65 … THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Writ Petition Nos.225, 1008, 1116, 2137, 2643, 2648, 2946, 3948, 3949, 4903, 5899,