Advanced Search Results
Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pro ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-30-2018
MRTP
to receive royalty: Provided further that every copyright society already registered before the coming into force of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 shall get itself registered under this Chapter within a period of one year from the date of commencement … as a result of which the TRAI Act was extended to broadcasting services which were undefined. By a Central Government notification dated 9.1.2004, the TRAI Act was expressly extended to broadcasting services, and certain functions were allocated … through the Statement of Objects and Reasons for the TRAI Act, the Preamble thereof, and in particular Sections 2(1)(k), 11 and 36, to contend that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSartaj Singh Pannu Vs. Gurbani Media Pvt Ltd and Anr
Delhi
May-22-2015
Service Tax
The Court has further concluded that the question whether for the purposes of Section 2 (v) of the Copyright Act, 1962 (CR Act), a Director of a film could be considered an „author‟ of an „artistic work‟ … of an author, which were independent of the rights of commercial exploitation. The failed attempt at introducing an amendment to Section 2 (d) (v) of the CR Act in 2010 to include a director as a joint … fact that although Pannu began shooting the film as Director since October 2012, it was only in January 2013 that the agreement was executed. According … for the Respondents tendered a copy of the certificate issued by the Central Board of Film Certification („CBFC‟) dated 13th March 2015 for the film … Party‟ and „party of the second part‟. The preamble clauses in the Agreement read as under:“Whereas: A.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavi Dev Gupta Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
Feb-04-2015
Land Acquisition
retrospective effect from 25.10.2011 and earlier the expression “cable operator” was defined under Section 2(aa). However, the said amendment is not a matter of much concern insofar as the present group of cases is concerned.13. The most … entered into a Media Rights Agreement with BCCI with effect from April 2012 which would continue upto 31.03.2018. ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd is responsible … prayed that Notification dated 03.07.2007 issued by the Central Government and the Notification dated 19.10.2007 issued by … of provisions relates to the CTN Act. The preamble to the CTN Act indicates that it is … which the court could not interfere. He, however, observed that if non-encryption resulted in the violation of any copyrights, which the appellants held as content owners, they were free to seek redressal. The learned single Judge, however, … Prasar Bharati under the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharati) Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as „the Sports Act‟). A declaration was also
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Board of Control for Cricket in India and Another Vs. Prasar Bharati B ...
Delhi
Feb-04-2015
MRTP
retrospective effect from 25.10.2011 and earlier the expression “cable operator” was defined under Section 2(aa). However, the said amendment is not a matter of much concern insofar as the present group of cases is concerned.13. The most … entered into a Media Rights Agreement with BCCI with effect from April 2012 which would continue upto 31.03.2018. ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd is responsible … prayed that Notification dated 03.07.2007 issued by the Central Government and the Notification dated 19.10.2007 issued by … of provisions relates to the CTN Act. The preamble to the CTN Act indicates that it is … which the court could not interfere. He, however, observed that if non-encryption resulted in the violation of any copyrights, which the appellants held as content owners, they were free to seek redressal. The learned single Judge, however, … Prasar Bharati under the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharati) Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as „the Sports Act‟). A declaration was also
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBoard of Control for Cricket in India and Another Vs. Prasar Bharati, ...
Delhi
Feb-04-2015
MRTP
retrospective effect from 25.10.2011 and earlier the expression “cable operator” was defined under Section 2(aa). However, the said amendment is not a matter of much concern insofar as the present group of cases is concerned.13. The most … entered into a Media Rights Agreement with BCCI with effect from April 2012 which would continue upto 31.03.2018. ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd is responsible … prayed that Notification dated 03.07.2007 issued by the Central Government and the Notification dated 19.10.2007 issued by … of provisions relates to the CTN Act. The preamble to the CTN Act indicates that it is … which the court could not interfere. He, however, observed that if non-encryption resulted in the violation of any copyrights, which the appellants held as content owners, they were free to seek redressal. The learned single Judge, however, … Prasar Bharati under the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharati) Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as „the Sports Act‟). A declaration was also
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouth Indian Music Companies Vs. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary ...
Chennai
Mar-30-2016
Education
was accordingly prescribed as per the rule making power available to the Central Government under Section 78(2) of the Copyright Act 1957. The rule also … of India praying to issue a writ of Declaration, declaring Sections 11, 12, 31 and 31-D of the Copyright Act, 1957, Rule 3 of the Copyright Rules, 2013, and the Copyright Board Salaries and Allowances and the … concerned, there is really no quibble that the State Legislature actually had the competence to carry out the amendment in view of the matter falling under Entry 42 of List-III of the VII Schedule, being the Concurrent … Limited Vs. Music Broadcast Private Limited, ((2012) 5 SCC 488 = AIR 2012 SC 2144), it has been held as follows: ''81. However, Section 31 … republican form of Government as proclaimed in the Preamble to the Constitution and any law which is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHome Cable Network Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India
Supreme Court of India
Aug-22-2017
Service Tax
is to be left undisturbed. Though such rights may seemingly come under Section 37 (Chapter VII) of the Copyright Act, 1957, it is argued that the telecast of the cricket matches is like production of a cinematograph … remain in force till such notifications are rescinded or amended, as the case may be. Prior to its amendment, Section 8 was in the following terms: operator“8. Compulsory transmission of Doordarshan channels.-(1) Every cable shall re-transmit,-- (i) … and between Star India 3 Private Ltd. and BCCI effective from April 2012 till March 2018 under which Star India Private Limited [respondent No.4 in … their cable service such Doordarshan channels that may be notified by the Central Government under the said Section 8 of the Cable Act. As DD1National) … the Cable Act, 1995 as indicated in the preamble is to regulate the operation of cable television
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSopan Foundation Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India
Supreme Court of India
Aug-22-2017
Service Tax
is to be left undisturbed. Though such rights may seemingly come under Section 37 (Chapter VII) of the Copyright Act, 1957, it is argued that the telecast of the cricket matches is like production of a cinematograph … remain in force till such notifications are rescinded or amended, as the case may be. Prior to its amendment, Section 8 was in the following terms: operator“8. Compulsory transmission of Doordarshan channels.-(1) Every cable shall re-transmit,-- (i) … and between Star India 3 Private Ltd. and BCCI effective from April 2012 till March 2018 under which Star India Private Limited [respondent No.4 in … their cable service such Doordarshan channels that may be notified by the Central Government under the said Section 8 of the Cable Act. As DD1National) … the Cable Act, 1995 as indicated in the preamble is to regulate the operation of cable television
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrasar Bharati Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India and Ors
Supreme Court of India
Aug-22-2017
Service Tax
is to be left undisturbed. Though such rights may seemingly come under Section 37 (Chapter VII) of the Copyright Act, 1957, it is argued that the telecast of the cricket matches is like production of a cinematograph … remain in force till such notifications are rescinded or amended, as the case may be. Prior to its amendment, Section 8 was in the following terms: operator“8. Compulsory transmission of Doordarshan channels.-(1) Every cable shall re-transmit,-- (i) … and between Star India 3 Private Ltd. and BCCI effective from April 2012 till March 2018 under which Star India Private Limited [respondent No.4 in … their cable service such Doordarshan channels that may be notified by the Central Government under the said Section 8 of the Cable Act. As DD1National) … the Cable Act, 1995 as indicated in the preamble is to regulate the operation of cable television
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Secretary Vs. ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-22-2017
Service Tax
is to be left undisturbed. Though such rights may seemingly come under Section 37 (Chapter VII) of the Copyright Act, 1957, it is argued that the telecast of the cricket matches is like production of a cinematograph … remain in force till such notifications are rescinded or amended, as the case may be. Prior to its amendment, Section 8 was in the following terms: operator“8. Compulsory transmission of Doordarshan channels.-(1) Every cable shall re-transmit,-- (i) … and between Star India 3 Private Ltd. and BCCI effective from April 2012 till March 2018 under which Star India Private Limited [respondent No.4 in … their cable service such Doordarshan channels that may be notified by the Central Government under the said Section 8 of the Cable Act. As DD1National) … the Cable Act, 1995 as indicated in the preamble is to regulate the operation of cable television
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »