Advanced Search Results

South Indian Film Chamber of Commerce, Madras and ors. Vs. Entertainin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Exhibition of Films on Television Screen through Video Cassette Recorders (Regulation) Act, 1984 - Sections 9(2), 10(2), 15 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 245 and 246; Copyright Act, 1957; Cinematograph Certification Rules, 1983

Reported in : JT1995(1)SC63; 1994(5)SCALE314; (1995)2SCC462; [1994]Supp6SCR674; 1995(1)LC474(SC)

Government a letter of consent got from the first owner of the copyright of such film under the Copyright Act, 1957 or its assignee thereunder, as that enacted by the Tamil Nadu State Legislature- 'the State Legislature', without being … appeals are filed assailing the sustainability of that judgment insofar as it relates to the striking down of Section 9(2) of the Tamil Nadu Exhibition of Films on Television Screen through Video Cassette Recorders (Regulation) Act, 1984- 'the

Anwar Mohammad Khan Son of Sri Niyamatullah Khan Vs. Sri Taj Mohammad ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 11, 12, 19, 27, 28, 29, 31, 71, 78, 79, 105, 106 and 159; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 485, 486 and 487; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 27, 27(1), 27(2), 124, 124(5), 134, 134(1), 135 and 135(2); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 36 to 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 22(1)

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2166

registered at number 611689 (subsequently corrected as 611389) under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and the Copyright Act, 1957 and the plaintiff No. 1- respondent Taj Mohammad Khan assigned the said trade mark and Copyright 'Ped Chhap … Gift Pack and Anr. 1999(1) Arb. L.R. 26 in relation with Sections 9, 27 and 105 of the Act No. 43 of 1958, the Court … the artistic work, lettering and colouring etc in the registered trade mark and has committed offences punishable under Section 78 and 79 of the Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act No.

K.i. George and anr. Vs. C. Cheriyan and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 54 and 62; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1986Ker12

usual terms. Intellectual Property Rights - jurisdiction - Sections 2, 54 and 62 of Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - revision petition challenging maintainability of suit before Munsiff's Court - under … much so what the plaintiff is claiming is an exclusive licence coming under the purview of Section 54(a), Copyright Act, 1957, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. Under Section 54 of the Act, the expression 'owner of copyright' shall

Entertaining Enterprises, Madras and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Tamil Nadu Exhibition of Films on Television Screen through Video Cassette Recorders (Regulation) Act, 1984 - Sections 9(2) and 10(2); Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2; Cinematograph Certification Rules, 1983; Constitution of India - Article 134A

Reported in : AIR1984Mad278

(Certification) Rules, that S. 9(2) read with Section 15(2) of the impugned Act and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 constitute different offences, and therefore Section 20 which makes an offence under the Act cognizable one cannot be

Syndicate of the Press of the Universtiy of Cambridge on Behalf of the ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 52; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 151 - Oders 26, 39 Rules 9, 1, 2

including plates? 8. Whether the activities of the defendant fall under the concept of fair dealing under the Copyright Act, 1957? OPD 9. Relief. 5. Though the respondents participated in the proceedings upto this stage and by filing the … become.questions to be answered in an examination and therefore, the work in question falls within the scope of section 52(1)(h) of the Indian Copyright Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act'), which provides for doctrine of fair

Star India Private Limited Vs. Leo Burnett (India) Private Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 51 and 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2003(2)BomCR655; 2003(27)PTC81(Bom)

Without prejudice to the aforesaid copyright, it does not vest in the plaintiffs under Section 17 of the Copyright Act, 1957 or under Clause 8 of the Agreement. At any event, there is no copying, much less substantial copying … enjoy tremendous popularity amongst television viewers in India as also abroad. The plaintiffs entered into an Agreement dated 9th April, 2000 with Balaji Telefilms Pvt. Ltd., (Balaji) in order to create, compose and produce 262 episodes of

Wiley Eastern Ltd. and ors. Vs. Indian Institute of Management

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62(2)

Reported in : 1995IVAD(Delhi)990; 61(1996)DLT281; 1995(35)DRJ522

plagiarism, there is no infringement of copyrights of the 1st plaintiff. The ingredients of Section 51 of the Copyright Act,1957 are not satisfied so as to raise any plea of infringement. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention it

The Jay Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. Sh. Ramesh Aggarwal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 105 and 106; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62 and 62(2); Designs Act, 2000; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 20 and 21 - Order 2, Rule 3 - Order 7, Rules 1, 10 and 11; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 134(2)

Reported in : LC2007(1)58; 2006(33)PTC561(Del)

further proceedings on 20.11.2006. Intellectual Property Rights - Territorial jurisdiction - Composite suit - Section 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957, Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Plaintiff filed a suit claiming infringement of trademark, infringement … the expression in normal parlance connotes, because of the ambit of a civil action within the meaning of Section 9 of the Code. But it is necessary that the following three conditions would be satisfied, namely:(1) The agent

Ani Technologies Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Intellectual Property

clients. In view of these circumstances, it is proposed to amend the 9 Copyright Act, 1957, suitably to combat effectively the piracy that is prevalent … is owned by the 2nd respondent without purchasing such copyright registered a complaint on 13-05-2017 alleging infringement of Copyright Act, 1957 (‘the Act’ for short). On registration of the said complaint before the Additional Commissioner of Police, investigation is … be conducted and an FIR came to be registered in Crime No.191 of 2017 alleging offences punishable under Sections 63 and 64 of the Act. At that juncture, the petitioners, the Company and the Directors of Ola

Espn Stars Sports Vs. Global Broadcast News Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 9 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 16, 18, 19, 19A, 30, 30A, 37, 37(3), 39, 39A, 52, 53, 55, 58, 61, 61(1), 64, 65 and 66

Reported in : LC2008(2)75; 2008(36)PTC492(Del)

Counsel submitted that broadcast reproduction rights are a special class of rights, recognized under Part VIII of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereafter 'the Act'). He relied upon Section 37 for the purpose. According to counsel, Section 37(3) provides, in … hours 30 minutes and 19 seconds. The Defendant No. 2 unauthorisedly utilized the footage to the extent of 9 Hours 24 minutes and five seconds. Defendant No. 1 unauthorisedly utilized footage to the extent of 9 hours