Advanced Search Results

Premwati Bansal Vs. M/S. Shri Ganpati International

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78, 79, 105 and 106; Indian Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 45(1), 57, 63 and 64

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)687; 82(1999)DLT398

106 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 as well as under Section 51 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 seeking the relief of permanent injunction and rendition of accounts. The case disclosed in the plaint is that … case discussed whether the interim injunction could be granted to the petitioner, who had filed a complaint under Section 78, 79, 106 and 105 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, against the unknown persons - The

Messrs Gulfam Exporters and Another Vs. Sayed Hamid and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 63; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78 and 79; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2(1), 200, 202 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1960 - Sections 420 and 483

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR619; 2000(3)MhLj183

the aforesaid offences. Secondly he contended that since there is no registration either under the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957 or the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 the prosecution for the offences under the said Acts i.e. … Mr. Desai Certified copy is expedited.15. Petition allowed. Intellectual Property Rights - complaint - Section 63 of Copyrights Act, 1957, Section 202 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 78 and 79 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and

Brundaban Sahu Vs. B. Rajendra Subudhi

Court : Orissa

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 16, 48, 51 and 63; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78 and 79

Reported in : AIR1986Ori210

Phulbani in I.C.C. No. 48 of 84 against the petitioner for the offence under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and under Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The opposite party filed

Madankumar Dharamchand JaIn and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1), 78 and 79; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63; Indian Penal Code(IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120, 120B, 465, 471, 472 to 475, 482, 483 and 486

Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR416

under sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957. These convictions were recorded by the learned Magistrate on 26th March, 1979. The first petitioner was sentenced to

Vimal Chand and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78, 79 and 117; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63 and 64; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120A, 120B, 417 and 420; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 7 and 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 156(3), 157(1), 397, 401, 451, 457 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 226 and 227

Reported in : 1999CriLJ128

Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (for short, the Act of 1958), Sections 63 and 64 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for brevity, the Act of 1957) read with Sections 420 & and 120B, IPC.3. Rest of the two … Further it is also not the case of the complainant in the FIRs that as is provided in Section 78 of the Act of 1958, the petitioners have acted while committing the aforesaid offences described in Sub-sections (a)

South Indian Music Companies Vs. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

to costs. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 14 Article 19 (1) (g) Article 50 Article 245 Article 300-A Copyright Act, 1957 Section 78(2) Copyright Rules, 2013 Rule 3 Copyright Board Salaries and Allowances and the other terms and conditions of

Flower Tobacco Company Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 93

Reported in : 1986(2)ARBLR121(Delhi); 30(1986)DLT158

May 26, 1986. (8) On March 3. 1986 the accused moved an application under Section 64(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and Sections 451 and 459 of the Criminal Procedure Code for cancelling the order of seizure and allowing … colour combination, lay out and arrangement. (3) On February 27, 1986 the complainant filed a complaint under Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade & Merchandise Mark Act, 1958 and Sections 63 and 64 of the Copyright

Pankaj Jaiswal and anr. Vs. Virendra Prasad Jaiswal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 3 and 21; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 63; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78 and 79; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 420

Reported in : 2007(1)CHN143,2007(35)PTC761(Cal)

against Vijay Jaiswal under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and under … mark. Both the said registrations and valid and subsisting. Plaintiff also holds a registration of copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957 in respect of 'SEC and device' having its registration No. A-58363/2001. The plaintiff sells its ceiling fans in … to him, a competing mark though having prior registration will not have exclusive right under the provision of Section 3 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. It is further submitted that the defendant No. 2 who is

The Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of IndiA. Vs. Uni ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2(ff), 13, 33(3), 34(3), 34, 78, 2(dd), 1 (2), 35 - Chapter 14 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 14, 19(1)(g), 12 ;

of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ striking down Sections 2(ff), 13, 33(3), 34(3) of the Copyright Act, 1957 as these provisions are perceived by the Petitioners as being violative of Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the … obligates the Central Government to keep in perspective the interests of the owners as well as the public. Section 78 of the Copyright Act empowers the Central Government to make Rules for carrying out the purposes of the

Anwar Mohammad Khan Son of Sri Niyamatullah Khan Vs. Sri Taj Mohammad ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 11, 12, 19, 27, 28, 29, 31, 71, 78, 79, 105, 106 and 159; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 485, 486 and 487; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 27, 27(1), 27(2), 124, 124(5), 134, 134(1), 135 and 135(2); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 36 to 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 22(1)

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2166

registered at number 611689 (subsequently corrected as 611389) under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and the Copyright Act, 1957 and the plaintiff No. 1- respondent Taj Mohammad Khan assigned the said trade mark and Copyright 'Ped Chhap … the artistic work, lettering and colouring etc in the registered trade mark and has committed offences punishable under Section 78 and 79 of the Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act No. 43