Advanced Search Results

Director of Income Tax Vs. Infrasoft Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

to address this issue.156. We must look into the meaning of the word "copyright" as given in the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 14 of this Act defines "Copyright" as "the exclusive right subject to the provisions of this Act, to

In Re: Megal Markus Pereira

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mental Health Act, 1987 - Sections 2; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 7; Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 53, 54(2), 76 and 96; Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; Constitution of India - Article 225; Family Courts Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62 and 62(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 7; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 32, Rule 15

Reported in : AIR2006Bom273; 2006(6)ALLMR298

and 12 of its Letters patent was a District Court for the purpose of Section 62(1) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 62 of the copyright Act, 1957 confers jurisdiction on the District Court. It is in that context that … to the supervision and control of the State Government or of any authority appointed by it in that behalf.Section 76 of the Act reads as under:76. Appeals.-----An appeal shall lie to the High Court from every order made

Samsonite Corporation Vs. Vijay Sales

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; Designs Act, 1911; Industrial Designs Act, R.S.C. 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT732

is a three dimensional representation, is an original artistic work within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The said artistic work is subject matter of copyright protection in India by virtue of India's membership to … brand in India.'The plaintiffs referred to a survey report and would state :-'Further the survey report shows that 76% of the sample thought that plaintiffs product and the Defendants product were very similar, and in such cases

Barbara Taylor Bradford Vs. Sahara Media Entertainment Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 2, 14 and 51; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 4

Reported in : 2004(1)CHN448,2004(28)PTC474(Cal),[2003]47SCL445(Cal)

our opinion, the large change meaning cannot be ascribed to the word 'alter' in Section 2(a)(v) of the Copyright Act, 1957, because it renders the interpretation absurd. Minor change, slight change, not making the original something beyond recognizable possibilities,

Super Cassette Industries Ltd. Vs. Entertainment Network (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 31(1), 31(2), 51 and 53; Medical Act, 1858 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi326; 112(2004)DLT549

songs produced and/or acquired by the appellant are sound recordings within the meaning of Section 2(xx) of the Copyright Act, 1957. It is alleged that the appellant being the owner of the copyright in the aforesaid sound recordings is

The Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of IndiA. Vs. Uni ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2(ff), 13, 33(3), 34(3), 34, 78, 2(dd), 1 (2), 35 - Chapter 14 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 14, 19(1)(g), 12 ;

of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ striking down Sections 2(ff), 13, 33(3), 34(3) of the Copyright Act, 1957 as these provisions are perceived by the Petitioners as being violative of Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the … filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ striking down Sections 2(ff), 13, 33(3), 34(3) of the Copyright Act, 1957 as these provisions are perceived by the Petitioners as … vs- The National Council of Educational Research & Training, AIR 1992 SC 76, despite noting that the Respondent veritably enjoys a monopoly, Article 12 of

The Academy of General Education Represented by the Registrar Sri K.K. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 40 and 41; Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 4

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1074; LC2008(1)373; ILR2008(1)Kar1075; 2008(1)KCCRSN82; 2008(2)AIRKarR517; AIR2008NOC1286; 2008AIHC2063(Kar)

to the definitions of the expressions 'literary work', 'dramatic work' and also to the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957.48. Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957 ('the Act' in short) in the heart and soul of the

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Empire Estate.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)132CTR(SC)221; [1996]218ITR355(SC)

Held, In interpreting the domestic/municipal laws, Court has extensively made use of international law for various purposes -Explained. COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957 -- Section 14; [S.B. Sinha & Lokeshwara Singh Panta, JJ] Licence -The underlying philosophy of the Copyright Act … the end of the year. Case Law Analysis : Wazid Ali Abid Ali v. CIT (1988) 169 ITR 761 (SC) followed. CIT v. Basant Behari Gopal Behari and Company (1988) 172 ITR 662 (All) and CIT v.

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. and Another Vs. Entertainment ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

India from time to time. The original respondent is a Copyright Society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and is a non-profit making body established on 23rd August 1969 to monitor, protect and enforce the rights, … to sound recording is distinct and different from the copyright in respect of musical work and literary work. 76. Learned senior counsel for the claimant invited my attention to some of the answers given by the witness

Castrol Limited vs Sanjay Sonavane and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

rights in the Defendant’s 3P Marks, including ; b. An order for declaration under Section 60 of the Copyright Act, 1957 that the Plaintiff’s 3X Marks, including do not infringe the Defendant’s copyright in the Defendant’s work;RFA(OS)(COMM) 38/2025 Page … - 74.5 22 Kunjan Nair Sivaraman Nair v. Narayanan 75.1 - 75.9 Nair 23 UOI v. H.K. Dhruv 76.1 - 76.4 24 Alka Gupta v. Narender Kumar Gupta 77.1 - 77.6 25 Coffee Board v. Ramesh Exports