Advanced Search Results

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs. Mr. Punit Goenka and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 18, 19, 30, 31, 31(1), 31A, 31A(4), 32, 51, 55, 63, and 135B(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC1(Del)

of absence of itemized songs, non compliance of provisions of assignment of Section 18 and 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and the maintainability of the suit in the absence of the original owners and have also denied any … page 91; Ramdev Food Products (P) Ltd. v. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel : (2006) 8 SCC 726, at page 753; Laxmikant v. Patel, v. Chetanbhai Shah : (2002) 3 SCC 65, at page 75. Relevant paragraphs of Midas

Sunil Kumar Sewa Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

Indian Penal Code, 78 & 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act and section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957. An FIR was instituted on the allegation that on a secret information having been received on 1.5.1997, the … the premises of shop nos. 25 and 26 of Bulu Market, Station Road, Jugsalai, a separate case under section 75 of the Essential Commodities Act was instituted by the police for violation of Bihar Essential Articles (Price &

Dr. Reckeweg and Co. GMBH through Constituted Attorney Mr. Subash Gupt ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 51 and 52; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 14; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1957 - Sections 122; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 130(2006)DLT16; 2006(32)PTC458(Del)

has not been infringed or plagiarized.13. In this context, it is worth referring to Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (the Act). This section defines 'copyright' as meaning the exclusive right to do or authorize the doing of … of Copyrights dated 5th May, 1999 bearing Registration No. 18231/99. This copyright is in the catalogue pertaining to 75 homeopathic specialty medicines. Similarly, the Plaintiffs have placed on record their copyright Registration No. 18275/99 dated 6th May,

Microforms Inc Vs. Girdhar and Co. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(2), 40, 48 and 51; ;Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 2(5); Designs Act, 1911; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 2(1); ;Patents Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT238; 2006(32)PTC157(Del)

however, claimed that whether such a copyright is registered or not, in view of the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Copyright Act) the copyright in the artistic works subsists and gives an exclusive … The plaintiff has claimed that the artistic work constitutes original artistic work as defined within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act. The plaintiff also claims that it enjoys copyright protection in India as a … Macmillan and Company Limited v. K. and J. Cooper A.I.R. 1924 PC 75. In the said judgment, the observations of Lord Halsbury in the case

Barbara Taylor Bradford Vs. Sahara Media Entertainment Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 2, 14 and 51; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 4

Reported in : 2004(1)CHN448,2004(28)PTC474(Cal),[2003]47SCL445(Cal)

our opinion, the large change meaning cannot be ascribed to the word 'alter' in Section 2(a)(v) of the Copyright Act, 1957, because it renders the interpretation absurd. Minor change, slight change, not making the original something beyond recognizable possibilities, … 100 crores and more. The expected annual turnover out of the serial including advertising is expected by Rs. 75 crores. They have already taken advance of Rs. 11 crores from intending advertising agents. Well known actors and

Syndicate of the Press of the Universtiy of Cambridge on Behalf of the ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 52; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 151 - Oders 26, 39 Rules 9, 1, 2

including plates? 8. Whether the activities of the defendant fall under the concept of fair dealing under the Copyright Act, 1957? OPD 9. Relief. 5. Though the respondents participated in the proceedings upto this stage and by filing the … though only 10% of all books are still in print; the remaining 75% are books which remain unavailable because they are still under copyright protection. … become.questions to be answered in an examination and therefore, the work in question falls within the scope of section 52(1)(h) of the Indian Copyright Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act'), which provides for doctrine of fair

The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of University of Oxford & O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

opined that this conclusion was buttressed given that while the term ‗reproduce‘ had not been defined in the Copyright Act, 1957, Section 2(hh) which defines ‗duplicating equipment‘, Section 2(s) which defines ‗photograph‘ and Section 2(x) which defines ‗reprography‘, contemplate the … Princeton University Press Vs. Michigan Document Services Inc., 2012 SCC37Province of Alberta Vs. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency and 758 F. Supp. 1522 Basic Books Inc. Vs. Kinko‘s Graphics Corporation, the plaintiffs pleaded that in order to equitably

Super Cassette Industries Ltd. Vs. Entertainment Network (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 31(1), 31(2), 51 and 53; Medical Act, 1858 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi326; 112(2004)DLT549

songs produced and/or acquired by the appellant are sound recordings within the meaning of Section 2(xx) of the Copyright Act, 1957. It is alleged that the appellant being the owner of the copyright in the aforesaid sound recordings is

Mendarian Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Inspector General of Regi ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 4, 4(1) and 4(2) - Schedule - Articles 5 and 23; ;Bengal Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1922; ;Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1990; ;Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1992; ;Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1994; ;West Bengal Finance Act, 1996

Reported in : 2004(1)CHN363

for every Rs. 500or part thereof in excess of Rs. 10,00,000.Exemptions(a)Assignment of copyright by entry made under the Copyright Act, 1957, section 18.(b) Co-partnership Deed,see Partnership (No. 46).' 5. Subsequent thereto on 31st January, 1994 in exercise of the power … Rs. 500 or part thereof in excess of Rs. 10,000.where it exceeds Rs. 50,000but does not exceed Rs. 75,000;Rupees three thousandsix hundred and thirty plus rupees sixty for every Rs. 500 or part thereof inexcess of Rs.

The Academy of General Education Represented by the Registrar Sri K.K. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 40 and 41; Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 4

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1074; LC2008(1)373; ILR2008(1)Kar1075; 2008(1)KCCRSN82; 2008(2)AIRKarR517; AIR2008NOC1286; 2008AIHC2063(Kar)

to the definitions of the expressions 'literary work', 'dramatic work' and also to the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957.48. Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957 ('the Act' in short) in the heart and soul of the