Advanced Search Results

Zahir Ahmed Vs. Azam Khan

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 14, 17, 44, 45, 51, 55, 72, 73, 74, 78 and 79; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13, 14, 16, 17, 27, 44, 45, 48, 53A and 63; ;Partnership Act - Section 69; ;Copyright Rules, 1958 - Rules 16, 17 and 27; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 156(3) and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 156(3), 415, 420 and 511

Reported in : 1996CriLJ290

under Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, and had prayed before him (learned Magistrate) for directing … the difficulty somewhat tardily, the learned Advocate for the petitioner, referring to Sections 44, 45, 72, 73 and 74 of the Act, read with Rules 16, 17 and 27 of the Copyright Rules, 1958 sought to contend

Director of Income Tax Vs. Infrasoft Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

to address this issue.156. We must look into the meaning of the word "copyright" as given in the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 14 of this Act defines "Copyright" as "the exclusive right subject to the provisions of this Act, to … any relief due under the provisions of this Act but before deduction of any relief due under this 74[Chapter]., by the total income; (iii) the expression “rate of tax of the said country” means income-tax and super-tax

Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. Vs. Super Cassette Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 11, 13, 13(4), 14, 14(1), 16, 17, 18, 19, 19A, 27, 30, 30A, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 31A, 31A(4), 32, 32(1A), 32A, 32B, 33, 33(3), 34, 34A, 34A(2), 35, 50, 51, 55, 63, 72, 74 and 78; Juvenile Justice Act; General Clauses Act; Copyright Rules, 1958 - Rules 3(3), 9, 11A, 11C(4), 11D, 14I, 14J and 14K; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 300A

Reported in : 2008(4)ALD47(SC); 2008(5)BomCR719; JT2008(7)SC11; LC2008(2)129; 2008(37)PTC353(SC); 2008(9)SCALE69; 2008AIRSCW6698; 2008(4)Supreme98; 2008(11)SCALE170; 2008(4)LH(SC)2638; 2008AIRSCW6698; 2008(4)LH(SC)2638

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.INTRODUCTION2. Interpretation of Section 31 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for the sake of brevity, hereinafter referred to as, `the Act') is involved in these appeals.We may notice … Act. Section 72 of the Act provides for appeals against orders of Registrar of Copyrights and Copyright Board. Section 74 empowers the Registrar of Copyrights and Copyright Board to exercise certain powers of civil courts.53. In view of

Shalimar Video Company, Rep. by Its Partner Mr. Mohd. Ashraf Vs. Divya ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 19(2) and 51; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 73 and 74; Civil Practice Rules - Rule 32; Cinematograph Act - Sections 2; Bombay Cinemas (Regulations) Act, 1953; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 24

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD447; 2004(6)ALT244

suit schedule films.29. According to Sri Srinivasa Reddy, learned Counsel for respondents, as per Section 19(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short 'the Copyright Act') which deals with mode of assignment, the rights assigned must be specific, and … Nagireddy was seriously ill and in a state of invalidation. 48. This contingency has been met with by Section 74 of the Trusts Act. Section 74 of the Trusts Act deals with the power of the Court to

Music Choice India Private Limited Vs. Phonographic Performance Limite ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 19A, 30, 31, 31(1), 33(3), 44, 49, 51, 63, 72, 73 and 74; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 345 and 346

under the Companies Act, 1956 and has been registered as a Collecting Society under Section 33(3) of the Copyright Act, 1957 ('The Act' for short) to carry on the business of issuing licenses inter alia to broadcast / communicate … resides or carried on business or personally works for gain.Section 73 deals with the procedure for appeals whereas Section 74 of the Act states that the register of Copyrights and Copyright Board to possess certain powers of a

Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore Vs. Sourabh Market ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CommercialIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; Copy Right Act, 1957 - Sections 1 to 6, 9 to 12, 13 to 21, 13(1 and 7), 19-A, 19-A(2), 22 to 29, 30 to 32-B, 33 to 36-A, 37 to 39-A, 44 to 50-A, 51 to 53-A, 53-A(3), 54 to 62, 71 to 73, 72(2) and 74 to 79; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 10, 14 to 16 and 30; Indian Copyright Act, 1914; Copyright Act, 1911; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 345 and 346; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Indian Contract Act, 1872

Reported in : ILR2000KAR5057; 2001(4)KarLJ78

and the jurisdiction of the Court below to try the same is barred by the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957 ('the Act' in short).2-A. Order VII, Rule 11 of the CPC contemplates rejection of plaint on certain grounds. … 19-A(2). Furthermore, in his attempt to substantiate his case, the attention of the Court was also invited to Section 74 of the Act contending that this provision confers on the Copyright Board the same powers which are conferred

M/S. Divya Exports. Vs. M/S. Shalimar Video Company, and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41 Rule 24; Indian Trusts Act 1881 - Section 73, 74

dated 14.8.2001 executed by M. Srinivasa Rao in favour of respondent No.1, referred to the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, two judgments of the Madras High Court and concluded that the plaintiff has failed to make out a … as well as documentary evidence produced by the parties, Sections 73 and 74 of the Trusts Act and held that Exhibit B.1 executed by respondent … light of the specific ground taken by the plaintiff in this appeal with regard to the application of Section 73 of the Indian Trusts Act 1881 (for short the Trusts Act ), I deem it absolutely necessary

Phonographic Performance Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

first petitioner is a Company, registered as a Copyright Society under the provisions of Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred as „the said Act‟). This registration entitles the first petitioner to commence and carry on the … present case is not a matter of appeal before Copyright Board under Section 72(1) of the said Act. Section 74 of the said Act is in respect of such determination which the Registrar makes under Section 45(2) of

Super Cassette Industries Ltd. Vs. Entertainment Network (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 31(1), 31(2), 51 and 53; Medical Act, 1858 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi326; 112(2004)DLT549

songs produced and/or acquired by the appellant are sound recordings within the meaning of Section 2(xx) of the Copyright Act, 1957. It is alleged that the appellant being the owner of the copyright in the aforesaid sound recordings is … notwithstanding a suit for infringement is pending and when so given defendant is estopped from denying plaintiff's title....' 74. He also placed reliance on the case of Phonographic Performance Limited vs. Retail Broadcast Services Ltd. reported as

The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of University of Oxford & O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

opined that this conclusion was buttressed given that while the term ‗reproduce‘ had not been defined in the Copyright Act, 1957, Section 2(hh) which defines ‗duplicating equipment‘, Section 2(s) which defines ‗photograph‘ and Section 2(x) which defines ‗reprography‘, contemplate the … is free to use that work in whatsoever manner he wishes to.‖ RFA(OS) No.81/2016 Page 55 of 58 74. Suffice it to state that the Court in B.D. Bhandari’s case (supra), while contrasting the concepts of ‗fair