Advanced Search Results

Jayanthilal M. Munoth and ors. Vs. Mr. M. Durairajan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13, 63 and 69; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406 and 417; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200

Reported in : [2006]132CompCas797(Mad); 2006(33)PTC330(Mad)

Real Steel Centre and came to know the infringement of copyrights which is punishable under Section 63 r/w Section 69 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The instruction manual printed and published by the complainant-company have been verbatim copied … Act, 1957. Right to artistic work also come under the copy right as per Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 2(c) defines artistic work to mean a drawing also (including a diagram, map, chart or plan). The allegation

J.N. Bagga and ors. Vs. All India Reporter Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5(2) and 177; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62, 69 and 69(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1969Bom302; (1969)71BOMLR409; 1969CriLJ1109; 1969MhLJ188

no separate legal existence, has been separately made liable under the provisions of this Act. Sub-section (1) of Section 69 of the Copyright Act, 1957, deals with the offence being committed by a company. When a company commits … residents of Allahabad. The firm, which is required to be treated as Company for the purpose of the Copyright Act, 1957, has its registered office at Allahabad. The writing of the book and the publishing of it have taken

Chitra NaraIn Vs. Ndtv and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200 and 202; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 51, 52A, 63 and 69

Reported in : 109(2004)DLT394; 2004(28)PTC238(Del)

telecasting the said feature and committed the offences punishable under Sections 51, 52A, 63 and 69 of the Copyright Act, 1957.11. The complaint was registered and the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate asked the complainant to lead evidence for inquiry … or otherwise of the person against whom the complaint is preferred.'2. The answer lies in the provision of Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 itself and is emphatic 'No' .3. In the instant case,

Mrs. Chitra NaraIn Vs. Ndtv,

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200 and 202; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 51, 52A, 63 and 69

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2618

telecasting the said feature and committed the offences punishable under Sections 51, 52A, 63 and 69 of the Copyright Act, 1957. 11. The complaint was registered and the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate asked the complainant to lead evidence for … or otherwise of the person against whom the complaint is preferred.'2. The answer lies in the provision of Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 itself and is emphatic 'NO'. 3. In the instant case,

Shanti Films Rep. by Its Proprietor K. Rajamanickam and R. Kavitha, Ka ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Partnership Act - Sections 69; Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 19; Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 15; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63 and 65; Notaries Rules, 1956 - Rule 11(2)

Reported in : LC2007(3)243

305 of 1997 has been filed by M/s. Shanti Films(i) for declaration that the plaintiff is the limited copyright owner of the 16mm Video and Television rights of the three Tamil pictures titled 'Nadodi Mannan', Adimaippenn' and … of the copyright as contemplated under Section 19 of the Copyrights Act, 1957.22. Per contra, the learned Counsel for Emgeeyar Pictures would contend that there … is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties.7. Whether the suit is liable to be dismissed in terms of Section 69 of the Partnership Act.8. Whether the suit is liable to be dismissed on account of turpitude on the

Vissa Television Network Ltd. and ors. Vs. Gemini Television P. Ltd. a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsFood Adulteration

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63, 69 and 69(1); Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 141; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)410; [2005]125CompCas815(AP)

June 28, 2003 and hence are liable for punishment under Section 63 read with Section 69 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short 'the Act').2. The learned Magistrate, after recording sworn statement of Mr. K. Radhakrishna, manager of the

Anuradha Paudwal and Another Vs. Brij Mohan Bhardwaj and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

Company, on accusation of having committed the offence punishable under Sections 61, 63, 65 and 69 of The Copyright Act, 1957 and Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC. 3. The case set-up by the complainant, in brief, insofar … M/s. Sardar Cassette Company and M/s Jain and Company, on accusation of having committed the offence punishable under Sections 61, 63, 65 and 69 of The Copyright Act, 1957 and Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC.

Dart Industries Inc. and anr. Vs. Techno Plast and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11, 18, 19, 20, 22, 22(2)(3), 22(3) and 29; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 15, 17, 45, 51, 53 and 55; Designs Rules, 2001; Designs Act, 1911; Patent Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2007(35)PTC285(Del)

injunction against the defendants under Section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000 read with Section 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The plaintiff No. 1 is a company incorporated under the laws of Delaware, USA. The plaintiff No. 2 … edition c 1989 created by Jane Anderson printed and bound by William Clowes Ltd., England on page No. 69 (Upper Photo with the written 'Beef turnovers'). This clearly shows that these products are prior published. These are

Zahir Ahmed Vs. Azam Khan

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 14, 17, 44, 45, 51, 55, 72, 73, 74, 78 and 79; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13, 14, 16, 17, 27, 44, 45, 48, 53A and 63; ;Partnership Act - Section 69; ;Copyright Rules, 1958 - Rules 16, 17 and 27; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 156(3) and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 156(3), 415, 420 and 511

Reported in : 1996CriLJ290

under Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, and had prayed before him (learned Magistrate) for directing … language of Section 44 would invariably have been different. The same could have been on the lines of Section 69 of the Partnership Act. But there is no provision in the Act depriving an author of the rights

Nav Sahitya Prakash and ors. Vs. Anand Kumar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13, 17, 44, 45, 48, 51 and 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 99 - Order 1, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1981All200

follows : --'The Indian Copyright Act. 1914, had nowhere made any provision for theregistration, of copyrights. Under the Copyright Act, 1957, it appears that under Sections 13, and 45, the registration of a book with the Registrar of Copyrights, … registration mandatory, the language of Section 44 would have been different. It could be on the lines of Section 69 of the Partnership Act. There is no provision in the Act depriving an author of the rights conferred