Advanced Search Results

Premwati Bansal Vs. M/S. Shri Ganpati International

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78, 79, 105 and 106; Indian Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 45(1), 57, 63 and 64

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)687; 82(1999)DLT398

78 and 79 of the Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 as well as under Sections 63 and 64 of the Indian copyright Act, 1957 was filed against unknown persons and that the Plaintiff effected seizure at … 106 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 as well as under Section 51 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 seeking the relief of permanent injunction and rendition of accounts. The case disclosed in the plaint is that

Espn Star Sports Vs. Global Broadcast News Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 18, 19, 30, 37, 37(3), 39, 39A, 51, 52, 52B, 53, 55, 58, 61, 61(1), 61(2), 64, 65 and 66; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 9; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : LC2008(3)257; 2008(38)PTC477(Del)

learned Single Judge had dismissed the entire suit of the appellant/plaintiff for non-compliance of Section 61 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). 2. After the arguments were heard in this appeal, both the parties … in the case of broadcast reproduction right. Notes on Clauses with reference to Section 61 reads as follows:Clause 64 - This clause provides that in any suit or other proceeding regarding infringement of copyright instituted by an

Ramakrishna Dish Antenna System Vs. the Deputy Superintendent of Polic ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 2(2), 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 6, 6(3), 7, 7(2), 10, 10(2), 20, 21, 32A, 37(1), 37(2), 37(3), 51, 63, 63A and 64(1); Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 - Sections 2(1), 5, 6 and 10; Radio, Television and Video Cassette Recorder Sets (Exemption from Licence Requirement) Rules, 1985 - Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4; Indian Wireless Telegraphy (Possession) Rules, 1965 - Rules 1; Commercial Broadcast Receivers (Dealers) Rules, 1965 - Rules 1, 2 and 3; Wireless Receiving Apparatus Rules, 1965 - Rule 1; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 37; Indian Telegraph (Amendment) Act, 1984; Cinematograph Act, 1952; Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955; Andhra Pradesh Entertainment Tax Act, 1939; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 94; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1983; Cons

Reported in : AIR1989AP295

and other notifications and proceedings issued by the Central Government, as well as the provisions of the Indian Copyright Act 1957 and the Rules made thereunder and also the provisions of the Cinematograph Act and the Rules mace by … to refer to the relevant statutory provisions and the rules under different headings.I. Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 :7. Section 3(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (as amended in 1984) defines 'Telegraph' as follows:'3 (1) 'Telegraph means … 63-A is introduced for enhanced penalty on second and subsequent convictions. Section 64(1) is newly substituted and reads as follows :'Section 64(1): any police officer,

Sk. Zaharul Islam Vs. Umakanta Khadiratna and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63 and 64; Copyright Amendment Act, 1984 - Sections 64(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 94 and 482

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1869

Section 94 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'the Code') and Section 64 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (in short 'the Act'), to issue search warrant for search and seizure of certain alleged materials in the

Rajesh Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalMedia and Communication

Reported in : 1996(3)WLC582; 1996(2)WLN92

the owner of such film so as to attract penal provisions of Section 63 & 68A of the Copyright Act, 1957. On such material before , the learned Magistrate had primafacie reasons to believe that the offence punishable under … stands charged with the offences punishable under Section 7 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and under Sections 63, 64 & 68A of the Copy Right Act, 1957.2. The relevant facts are that on June 22, 1994 at

Vimal Chand and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78, 79 and 117; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63 and 64; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120A, 120B, 417 and 420; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 7 and 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 156(3), 157(1), 397, 401, 451, 457 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 226 and 227

Reported in : 1999CriLJ128

Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (for short, the Act of 1958), Sections 63 and 64 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for brevity, the Act of 1957) read with Sections 420 & and 120B, IPC.3. Rest of the two … copies so seized shall, as soon as practicable, be produced before the Magistrate. However, under Sub-section (2) of Section 64 of the Copyright Act, the person aggrieved by such seizure may within fifteen days apply to the concerned

Flower Tobacco Company Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 93

Reported in : 1986(2)ARBLR121(Delhi); 30(1986)DLT158

May 26, 1986. (8) On March 3. 1986 the accused moved an application under Section 64(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and Sections 451 and 459 of the Criminal Procedure Code for cancelling the order of seizure and allowing

Ghurey Lal and ors. Vs. State Through Ram NaraIn Pathak

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63, 64 and 66

Reported in : AIR1965All206

woulddecide the case with all expedition. Criminal - infringement of copyright - Sections 63, 64 and 66 of Copyright Act, 1957 - printer at Bareilly has copyright to print certain books - another printer at Hathras producing infringed copies … of Knowledge of infringement by the accused, the production of the infringing copies would clearly be best evidence,13. Section 64 of the Act provides that where a magistrate has taken cognizance of any offence under Section 63 in

A. Susiah Vs. S. Muniswamy

Court : Chennai

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 17, 19, 63 and 64

Reported in : AIR1966Mad175; 1966CriLJ553; (1965)2MLJ377

acquittal. The appellant filed a complaint against the respondent for an offence punishable under S. 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, alleging that the respondent had infringed his copyright in what he claimed as a literary work called 'Topics … of Ch. XIII for an action in respect of an offence is, to quote the language of the section; 'knowingly infringes or abets the infringement of--(a) the copyright in a work; or (b) any other right conferred … and that the infringing copies are liable to be seized under S. 64 of the Act.(2) The Seventh Presidency Magistrate who tried the case found

M/S. Arte Indiana Vs. M/S. P. Mittulaul Lalah and Sons

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Mercandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78 and 79; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rules 2, 3 and 4; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62(2), 63 and 64; Constitution of India - Article 183; Banking Companies Act, 1949

Reported in : AIR1999Bom369; 1999(4)BomCR239

of the Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and sections 63 and 64 of the Copyright Act, 1957 with the police department at Chennai and … out of which this appeal has arisen, was filled by the appellants complaining of violation of copyright under Copyright Act, 1957, as also infringement of trademark and passing off. The appellant has its office at Mumbai and it carries … the appellant/plaintiff has alleged in the plaint, this Court has the jurisdiction in view of the provisions of section 62(2) of the Copyright Act which, unlike other enactments, gives right to a plaintiff to institute the suit