Advanced Search Results

Christian Louboutin Sas vs.nakul Bajaj & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has discussed the scope Section 79 and 81 of the IT Act and Section 51 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter, ‘Copyright Act’). The Single Judge, had held that MySpace is liable for secondary infringement under Section 51(a)(i) … top 5 prestigious women’s luxury shoe brand. The name the name, that CS (COMM) 344/2018 Page 1 of 59 “Christian Louboutin”, in word form and logo form, as also the red sole mark, are registered trademarks in

Phonographic Performance Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

first petitioner is a Company, registered as a Copyright Society under the provisions of Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred as „the said Act‟). This registration entitles the first petitioner to commence and carry on the

Samsonite Corporation Vs. Vijay Sales

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; Designs Act, 1911; Industrial Designs Act, R.S.C. 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT732

is a three dimensional representation, is an original artistic work within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The said artistic work is subject matter of copyright protection in India by virtue of India's membership to … the umbrella trademark of SAMSONITE. The first plaintiff is a registered proprietor of the trade mark SAMSONITE in 59 countries. In India, the first plaintiff has registered its trade mark SAMSONITE under class 18 bearing registration Nos.

The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of University of Oxford & O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

opined that this conclusion was buttressed given that while the term ‗reproduce‘ had not been defined in the Copyright Act, 1957, Section 2(hh) which defines ‗duplicating equipment‘, Section 2(s) which defines ‗photograph‘ and Section 2(x) which defines ‗reprography‘, contemplate the … to a collective work, means each of the works or parts of the works in the collective work.‖ 59. The Section deals with copying for educational purposes and pertaining to the issue at hand if done in

Director of Income Tax Vs. Infrasoft Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

to address this issue.156. We must look into the meaning of the word "copyright" as given in the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 14 of this Act defines "Copyright" as "the exclusive right subject to the provisions of this Act, to

Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. vs La Chemise Lacoste and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

in circulation, and the other acts mentioned in Section 14 of the Copyright Act.”17.9 Section 14(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957 defines “copyright” as the exclusive right to, inter alia, reproduce a work, issue copies of the work to … or compilation without the necessity of its registration. [Satsang v. Kiron Chandra Mukhopadhyay, AIR 1972 Calcutta 533 (V 59 C 114)]. Registration of the work under the Act is not compulsory and registration is not a condition

Lacoste vs Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

in circulation, and the other acts mentioned in Section 14 of the Copyright Act.=17.9 Section 14(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957 defines <copyright= as the exclusive right to, inter alia, reproduce a work, issue copies of the work to … or compilation without the necessity of its registration. [Satsang v. Kiron Chandra Mukhopadhyay, AIR 1972 Calcutta 533 (V 59 C 114)]. Registration of the work under the Act is not compulsory and registration is not a condition

Nri Film Production Associates (P) Ltd. Vs. Twentieth Century Fox Film ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copy Right Act, 1957 - Sections 2 and 55; Copy Right (Amendment) Act, 1957 - Sections 2

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4530

for a declaration that the Movie Independence Day (I.D.) produced by the defendants is the infringement of the copyright of the film script Extra Terrestrial Mission (E.T.M.). Further seek an injunction against display of the film in … a sequel to the observations of Hon'ble Pathak J, an amendment to Section 2 of the Copy right Act, 1957 is effected by incorporating Clause (V) w.e.f. 10.5.1995 which reads thus:(a) 'adoption' means, -(i) in relation to a … the similar presentation and effects. - MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 [C.A. No. 59/1988]Sections 147 & 149: [N. Kumar, J] Liability of Insurer - Contention that

Saranya Zaveri and anr. Vs. Kamadon Academy P. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 134, 134(1) and 134(2); Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 40, 55, 62, 62(1) and 62(2); Kerala Stamp Act - Sections 33; Corporations Act, 2001 - Sections 45A, 114, and 127(1); Evidence Act - Sections 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 15 to 20, 21, 26, 43, 115 and 151 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order 7, Rule 1, 8, 10, 11 - Order 8, Rule 3 - Order 43, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [2006]133CompCas546(Ker); 2008(38)PTC554(Ker)

1, Civil Procedure Code and Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957, is for a declaration that the plaintiff is the exclusive owner and proprietor of the marks Kamadon and … that the plaintiff is pursuing and doing its work from the office of the plaintiff at door No. 59/592, 1st floor, Beeta Plaza, Dr. Krishnaswamy Road, Ernakulam, Kochi. Even assuming that by imparting level based education, learning

The Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-2 vs.zte Corpor ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

"a copyrighted right".6. The assessee also relied on the definition of "copyright" under Section 14 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957. It also relied on the decision of Delhi Special Bench Tribunal in Motorola India vs DCIT (95 ITD269.