Advanced Search Results

Amar Nath Sehgal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 57; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)349; 2002(2)ARBLR130(Delhi); 97(2002)DLT439; 2002(63)DRJ558

the defendants are pleaded to be in gross violation of plaintiff's moral rights under Section 57 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The plaintiff has, in order to vindicate his cause, in the suit filed by him, seeks reliefs in

Mannu Bhandari Vs. Kala Vikas Pictures Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 57

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi13; ILR1986Delhi191

author end, where does the Director begin? What is the scope and width of Section 57 of the Copyright Act, 1957? These are the questions F raised in Manna Bhandari's suit against M/s. Kala Vikas Pictures (Pvt.) Ltd. and

A.S. Ahluwalia Vs. General Manager, Delhi Telephones

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 29(1986)DLT143

author and, where does the Director begin What is the scope and width of section 57 of the Copyright Act, 1957? These are the questions raised in Mannu Bhandari's suit against M/s. Kala Vikas Pictures (Pvt.) Ltd. and its

Amar Nath Sehgal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 52(1), 57 and 57(1)

Reported in : 117(2005)DLT717; 2005(30)PTC253(Del)

no alternative, but to knock at the doors of the Court. Taking shelter of Section 57 of the Copyright Act,1957, the present suit was filed praying for declaration that the plaintiff's special rights under Section 57 of the

Najma Heptulla Vs. Orient Longman Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 57(1)

Reported in : 1989(16)DRJ5

Matched in: Advocate Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 57(1

Wiley Eastern Ltd. and ors. Vs. Indian Institute of Management

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62(2)

Reported in : 1995IVAD(Delhi)990; 61(1996)DLT281; 1995(35)DRJ522

plagiarism, there is no infringement of copyrights of the 1st plaintiff. The ingredients of Section 51 of the Copyright Act,1957 are not satisfied so as to raise any plea of infringement. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention it … what was being sought for by the plaintiffs was enforcement of 'author's special right' within the meaning of Section 57(1)(b) of the Copyright Act,1957. The following is the extract of paragraph 7:- '7. At the time of hearing,

Garapati Prasada Rao Vs. Parnandi Saroja and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14(1), 52A, 57, 57(1), 63 and 68A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482

Reported in : AIR1992AP230; 1991(2)ALT328; 1992CriLJ2561

Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The 1st respondent filed a complaint under Sections 52A, 63 and 68A of the Tndian Copyright Act, 1957 against the petitioner (accused No. 2) and two others who are shown as respondents 2 and 3 in … and therefore it is an offence punishable under S. 63 read with S. 57 of the Copyright Act. Section 57 deals with author's special rights. Sub-section (1) cl. (a) reads that independently of the author's copyright, and even

Gm Modular Pvt. Ltd. vs Mumtaz Ahmed & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

work and the Petitioner is the owner and proprietor of the copyright therein within the meaning of the Copyright Act, 1957. The Petitioner’s Artistic Work is also registered under the Signature Not Verified C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 176/2024 Page 4 of … Rai, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J1. The present Rectification Petition has been filed under Section 57 ofthe Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”) seeking rectification of the Register of Trade Marks by cancellation / removal

M/S. A. Habeebur Rahman Sons and Mr. K. Rajender

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Intellectual Property

under No.A-52292/93, A-52290/93, A-52293/93 and A-52289/93 together with the letter ‘S written in an artistic manner under the Copyright Act, 1957. It is stated that the respondent herein has in the year 2007 obtained registration of trade mark letter … loss of goodwill and reputation, and as such the applicants are the persons aggrieved within the meaning of section 57 of the Act and are entitled to file the present rectification proceedings. 5. The respondent filed the counter-statement

A.V. Meiyappan Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Board of Revenue, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ConstitutionSales Tax

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(36); Constitution of India - Article 366(12); Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 3(2) and 12(3)

Reported in : AIR1969Mad284; [1967]20STC115(Mad)

the producer of a film got under the law in relation to cinematograph productions were governed by the Copyright Act, 1957, at the present time.; That the owner of a cinematograph film was an author within the meaning of … right of licence" in the work. Chapter XII provides for civil remedies in cases of infringement of copyright.21. Section 57 of the Act reserves the right of an author independently of the author's copyright and even after he