Advanced Search Results

K.i. George and anr. Vs. C. Cheriyan and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 54 and 62; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1986Ker12

much so what the plaintiff is claiming is an exclusive licence coming under the purview of Section 54(a), Copyright Act, 1957, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. Under Section 54 of the Act, the expression 'owner of copyright' shall

Rupendra Kashyap Vs. Jiwan Publishing House

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 18 and 54; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 162

Reported in : 1996(38)DRJ81

1990 onwards by defendant No.3 and thereforee is the owner of the copyright under section 54 of the Copyright Act 1957. No one other than the plaintiff could publish, print, reprint, reproduce sell or offer for sell in any

Phonographic Performance Ltd. Vs. Hotel Gold Regency and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 30, 33, 33(1), 33(3), 34, 34(1), 34(3), 35, 35(2), 51, 53A, 54, 55, 61, 61(1) and 62; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 188; Companies Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR2009Delhi11; 151(2008)DLT210; LC2008(2)451; 2008(37)PTC587(Del)

the maintainability of the suit:1. Whether, in view of the provisions of sections 33 and 34 of the Copyright Act, 1957, a suit for infringement of copyright would be maintainable at the instance of a registered copyright society in … is followed by Chapter XII which deals with civil remedies and comprises of Sections 54 to Section 62. Section 54 defines the expression 'owner of copyright' for the purposes of Chapter XII, to include, inter alia, an exclusive

Eurokids International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. India Book Distributors Egmont Bo ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 51, 54, 61 and 61(1)

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR198

created in favour of plaintiffs.9. In support of his submissions Mr. Saraf invites my attention to definitions in Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for the sake of brevity) and more particularly term 'Exclusive Licence' (Section … 19 as well as Section 51 of the Act. He also takes me through Chapter-XII and more particularly Section 54. Mr. Saraf also relies upon a Division Bench decision reported in : AIR1985Delhi29 . He submits that the

Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. vs La Chemise Lacoste and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

in circulation, and the other acts mentioned in Section 14 of the Copyright Act.”17.9 Section 14(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957 defines “copyright” as the exclusive right to, inter alia, reproduce a work, issue copies of the work to … The author of the work is the first owner of the copyright under Section 17 of the Act. Section 54 defines the “owner of copyright” as including the author of a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, whether

Lacoste vs Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

in circulation, and the other acts mentioned in Section 14 of the Copyright Act.=17.9 Section 14(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957 defines <copyright= as the exclusive right to, inter alia, reproduce a work, issue copies of the work to … The author of the work is the first owner of the copyright under Section 17 of the Act. Section 54 defines the <owner of copyright= as including the author of a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, whether

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs. Hamar Television Network Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 2(1), 13(1), 14, 17, 19, 30, 31, 39, 51, 52, 54, 171(3) and 173(3); Human Rights Act, 1998; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 39, Ruoe 1 and 2

that he had exclusive licence for publishing the past papers and hence, was the owner of copyright under Section 54 of the Copyright Act, 1957. One of the issues which the court was required to consider was the … have invoked the statutory defence of 'fair dealing' as provided in Section 52(1)(a)(ii) and Section 52(1)(b)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'Copyright Act') .3. In this context let me advert to facts which, in my

Anuradha Paudwal and Another Vs. Brij Mohan Bhardwaj and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

Company, on accusation of having committed the offence punishable under Sections 61, 63, 65 and 69 of The Copyright Act, 1957 and Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC. 3. The case set-up by the complainant, in brief, insofar … whereas Section 52 envisages the situation where certain acts will not amount to infringement of copyright acts. Likewise, Section 54 of Chapter XII defines the expression of "owner of copyright", whereas civil ti remedies for infringement of such

Saregama India Limited Vs. Mahal Pictures Private Limited.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property

It would also be useful to refer to the provisions of sections 54, 55 and 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957 which read as under: … the petitioner/ original defendant No.3 are also registered with the Registrar of Copyrights under the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957. The defendant No.3 in exercise of rights granted in his favour further granted a limited licence in favour … Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit in terms of the provisions of section 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957. (2) Do the defendants prove that this Court does not have territorial

In Re: Megal Markus Pereira

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mental Health Act, 1987 - Sections 2; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 7; Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 53, 54(2), 76 and 96; Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; Constitution of India - Article 225; Family Courts Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62 and 62(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 7; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 32, Rule 15

Reported in : AIR2006Bom273; 2006(6)ALLMR298

and 12 of its Letters patent was a District Court for the purpose of Section 62(1) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 62 of the copyright Act, 1957 confers jurisdiction on the District Court. It is in that context that … taking care of himself, the District Court or, where a direction has been issued under Sub-section (2) of Section 54, the collector of the District, may appoint any suitable person to be his guardian.2. In the discharge of