Advanced Search Results

Hindustan Lever Limited, Vs. Nirma Private Limited, Ahmedabad

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 29; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5); Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 15(2), 17, 48 and 51

Reported in : AIR1992Bom195

apprenticeship, the employer concerned is entitled to the copyrights in the artistic work as the first owner thereof. Section 48 of the Copyright Act, 1957 reads as under:'48. The Register of Copyrights shall be prima facie evidence of … plaint);(g) Artistic work -- Label -- under Nos. A-44275/84 and A-44276/84 dated 9th March 1984 duly registered under Copyright Act, 1957 (Exhibits 'Y-1' and 'Y-2' to the plaint);(h) Artistic work (Exhibit 'D' to the plaint) prepared by the Artist

Nav Sahitya Prakash and ors. Vs. Anand Kumar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13, 17, 44, 45, 48, 51 and 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 99 - Order 1, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1981All200

follows : --'The Indian Copyright Act. 1914, had nowhere made any provision for theregistration, of copyrights. Under the Copyright Act, 1957, it appears that under Sections 13, and 45, the registration of a book with the Registrar of Copyrights, … necessary to render further proof to show that the copyright vested in the person mentioned in the register. Section 48 of the Copyright Act provides that the registration, of Copyright Act shall be prima facie evidence of the

Inception Media LLP Vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

that she obtained on 8th November 2013, and, he says, that ends the matter especially in view of Section 48 of the Copyright Act, 1957. That section, with emphasis added, reads: Section 48 â” Register of Copyrights to … On 21st November 2012, Ms. Kothari applied for a registration of this work in her name under the Copyright Act, 1957 (Plaint, Ex.B, pp. 52-54). 6. In 2012-13, Ms. Kothari worked with Baba Arts Limited (âBaba Artsâ?) as a

Inception Media LLP Vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

that she obtained on 8th November 2013, and, he says, that ends the matter especially in view of Section 48 of the Copyright Act, 1957. That section, with emphasis added, reads: Section 48 â” Register of Copyrights to … On 21st November 2012, Ms. Kothari applied for a registration of this work in her name under the Copyright Act, 1957 (Plaint, Ex.B, pp. 52-54). 6. In 2012-13, Ms. Kothari worked with Baba Arts Limited (âBaba Artsâ?) as a

Microforms Inc Vs. Girdhar and Co. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(2), 40, 48 and 51; ;Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 2(5); Designs Act, 1911; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 2(1); ;Patents Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT238; 2006(32)PTC157(Del)

however, claimed that whether such a copyright is registered or not, in view of the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Copyright Act) the copyright in the artistic works subsists and gives an exclusive … Designs Act, 2000 was enacted to provide a more effective protection to the registered designs. In terms of Section 48 of this Act, the Designs Act, 1911 was repealed. However any notification, rule, etc. under the old Act

Syndicate of the Press of the Universtiy of Cambridge on Behalf of the ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 52; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 151 - Oders 26, 39 Rules 9, 1, 2

including plates? 8. Whether the activities of the defendant fall under the concept of fair dealing under the Copyright Act, 1957? OPD 9. Relief. 5. Though the respondents participated in the proceedings upto this stage and by filing the … become.questions to be answered in an examination and therefore, the work in question falls within the scope of section 52(1)(h) of the Indian Copyright Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act'), which provides for doctrine of fair … in every.original literary work, a literary work including, by virtue of Section 48(1), compilation. Under Section 2(5)(a) and Section 49(1), copyright gave the exclusive right

Zahir Ahmed Vs. Azam Khan

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 14, 17, 44, 45, 51, 55, 72, 73, 74, 78 and 79; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13, 14, 16, 17, 27, 44, 45, 48, 53A and 63; ;Partnership Act - Section 69; ;Copyright Rules, 1958 - Rules 16, 17 and 27; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 156(3) and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 156(3), 415, 420 and 511

Reported in : 1996CriLJ290

under Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, and had prayed before him (learned Magistrate) for directing … necessary to render further proof to show that the copyright vested in the person mentioned in the register. Section 48 of the Copyright Act provides that the registration of copyright shall be prima facie evidence of the particulars

Fortune Films International Vs. Dev Anand and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(4), 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 30, 55 and 55(1); Copyright Act, 1911 - Sections 35; Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 48(1); Constitution of India - Article 133(1)

Reported in : AIR1979Bom17; (1978)80BOMLR263

the motion picture would belong to the producers. (3) [t was submitted that under the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, the copyright in a cine artiste's performance was not any 'work' which was protected and, therefore, despite the … incidents represented give the work an original character.' 'Dramatic work' has been defined in the following words in Section 48 (1) of the Copyright Act, 1956 : 'Dramatic work' includes a choreographic work or entertainment in dumb show

Brundaban Sahu Vs. B. Rajendra Subudhi

Court : Orissa

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 16, 48, 51 and 63; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78 and 79

Reported in : AIR1986Ori210

Phulbani in I.C.C. No. 48 of 84 against the petitioner for the offence under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and under Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The opposite party filed

Modern Food Industries (i) Limited Vs. Modern Bakery and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 20(1), 29 and 34; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2 and 48

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN65,2007(34)PTC504(Cal)

and the company is also entitled to use the said label exclusively. He also drew our attention to Section 48 of the Copyright Act, 1957. He further drew our attention to Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, … was registered as a copyright in favour of the company being No. A-9291/73 under the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957.5. The said company expanded its activities over time from one production unit in 1956 to 14 bakery units