Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: copyright act 1957 section 42 · Page 1 of about 404 results (0.034 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 09 2009

Pvr Pictures Ltd. Vs. Studio 18

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-09-2009

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 14(1), 41 and 42; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 18, 19 and 30; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC70(Del)

Rights by way of 'sole' and exclusive license by LICENSOR to the Distributor under the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957 (as amended from time to time).XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX TERMS AND CONDITIONS XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX 2. The … damages are not an appropriate remedy, the exclusive nature of the license is conferred with a right, under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (hereafter 'the SR Act'). Reliance is placed upon the judgment of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2008

Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. Vs. Dr. Ramya Raghu and or ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 18, 18(2), 19, 21 and 22; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 4

Reported in : 2008(38)PTC212(Del)

the plaintiff and blanks whereof were filled in by the defendant No. 1. 9. Section 18 of the Copyright Act, 1957 provides that the owner of the copyright in an existing work or the prospective owner of the copyright … the agreement. However, the plaintiff has neither pleaded nor argued for enforcement of the said negative covenant under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act. In fact, the counsel for the plaintiff on initial inquiry had denied that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1999

A.K. Enterprises, Agra Vs. Sterling Machine Tolls and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-02-1999

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 105; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(4), 3, 24, 62, 62(2) and 115; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 8, 8(1) and 8(2); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 34, 42 and 110; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Allahabad High Courts Rules, 1952 - Rule 11; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7(3); Constitution of India- Article 236; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC897

the Munsifs Court had no Jurisdiction to try the suit and in view of Section 62 of the Copyright Act. 1957. the District Court had only Jurisdiction to try the same, has also no (relevance) in the matter in … the subject-matter of arbitration, had it been the subject-matter of a suit, has been implledly taken away by Section 42 of the Act which is couched in a language fraught with overriding effect. I am conscious of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 31 2016

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. and Another Vs. Entertainment ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-31-2016

Subject : Arbitration

India from time to time. The original respondent is a Copyright Society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and is a non-profit making body established on 23rd August 1969 to monitor, protect and enforce the rights, … submission that the action in rem could not be referred to arbitration even by consent of the parties. 42. It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the original respondent that though the issue regarding infringement

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2026

Coromandel Indag Products India Ltd. vs Sumitomo Chemical Company Ltd. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-18-2026

Subject : Intellectual Property

product bearing the impugned mark, i.e., “ ” which it claims is protected under Section 14 of the Copyright Act,1957. It is further asserted that the Plaintiff has developed substantialgoodwill through extensive sales, promotion, and quality control which … 48(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which provides that the use of a trademark13 AIR 2011 Guj 42 14 2001 SCC OnLine Bom 1019 15 (2007) 15 SCC 52 16 (2006) 3 SCC 100 Signed By:GUNN

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2006

Anwar Mohammad Khan Son of Sri Niyamatullah Khan Vs. Sri Taj Mohammad ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-22-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 11, 12, 19, 27, 28, 29, 31, 71, 78, 79, 105, 106 and 159; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 485, 486 and 487; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 27, 27(1), 27(2), 124, 124(5), 134, 134(1), 135 and 135(2); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 36 to 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 22(1)

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2166

registered at number 611689 (subsequently corrected as 611389) under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and the Copyright Act, 1957 and the plaintiff No. 1- respondent Taj Mohammad Khan assigned the said trade mark and Copyright 'Ped Chhap … 1985') and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and under Sections 420, 485, 486, 487 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant-defendant did not … the artistic work, lettering and colouring etc in the registered trade mark and has committed offences punishable under Section 78 and 79 of the Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1993

M/S. Super Cassette Industries Ltd. Vs. M/S. Bathla Cassettes India (P ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-04-1993

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 60; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96 - Order 39, Rule 4; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42

Reported in : AIR1994Delhi237; 1993(1)ARBLR538(Delhi); 50(1997)DLT7; 1993(25)DRJ410; 1993RLR243

in respect of an alleged infringement of the copyright, any person aggrieved thereby may notwithstanding anything contained in Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 institute a declaratory suit that the alleged infringement to which the threats … are that M/s. Bathla Cassettes Industries Private Ltd. filed a suit seeking declaration under Section 60 of the Copyright Act (hereinafter called as the 'Act') on the ground of groundless threats extended by the defendants M/s. Super Cassettes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2012

A.Kamarunnisa Ghori. Vs. the Chairperson Prevention of Money Launderin ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-11-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 5(1)(5), 8(3)(4), 8(6)(8), 71, 26(1), 42; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 420, 511, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 121, 121-A, 489-A, 489-B, 302, 304, 307, 308, 327, 329, 364A, 384 to 389, 392 to 402, 467, 489-A, 489-B, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 467, 471, 472, 473, 475, 476, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 - Sections 4, 5; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 173; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances(NDPS) Act. - Sections 15 to 24, 25-A, 27-A, 29; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 to 5; Arms Act, 1959. ; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 ; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 ; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ; Explosives Act, 1884; Antiquities and Arts Treasures Act, 1972 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 ; Customs Act, 1962 ; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 ; Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 ; Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 ; Emigration Act, 1983 ; Passports Act, 1967 ; Foreigners Act, 1946 ; Copyright Act, 1957 ; Trade Marks Act, 1999 ; Information Technology Act, 2000 ; Biological Diversity Act, 2002 ; Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 ; Environment Protection Act, 1986 ; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 ; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 300-A

2000Paragraph-14Offences under the Emigration Act, 1983Paragraph-15Offences under the Passports Act, 1967Paragraph-16Offences under the Foreigners Act, 1946Paragraph-17Offences under the Copyright Act, 1957Paragraph-18Offences under the Trade Marks Act, 1999Paragraph-19Offences under the Information Technology Act, 2000Paragraph-20Offences under the Biological Diversity Act, … Passports Act, 1967Paragraph-16Offences under the Foreigners Act, 1946Paragraph-17Offences under the Copyright Act, 1957Paragraph-18Offences under the Trade Marks Act, 1999Paragraph-19Offences under the Information Technology Act, 2000Paragraph-20Offences … fact that the order of the Appellate Tribunal is ultimately subject to an appeal to this Court under Section 42 of the Act. By the time the petitioners go before the Appellate Authority and thereafter come up before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2012

Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. Vs. Aditya Pandey and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2012

Subject : Education

to a Communication to the Public of Literary and Musical Works embodied in the Sound Recording under the Copyright Act 1957 post the said Act being amended by the Copyright (Amendment) Act 1994? If yes: Whether a separate license … by the Copyright (Amendment) Act 1994 and as would be evident from our discussion, the data i.e. the Sections which we were called upon to analyze reveal a reality of the whole being multidimensional, and before we … in the statutory provisions of the Statute in India and United Kingdom. 42. After noting Sections 5A, 9, 16, 19 and 20 of UK CDP

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1998

Samsonite Corporation Vs. Vijay Sales

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-01-1998

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; Designs Act, 1911; Industrial Designs Act, R.S.C. 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT732

is a three dimensional representation, is an original artistic work within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The said artistic work is subject matter of copyright protection in India by virtue of India's membership to … to apply a design to any article in any class in which the design is registered.'Sections 3 to 42 have been omitted by the Patents Act, 1970. Section 47 of the Act provides duration of projection for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial