Advanced Search Results

Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. vs La Chemise Lacoste and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

in circulation, and the other acts mentioned in Section 14 of the Copyright Act.”17.9 Section 14(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957 defines “copyright” as the exclusive right to, inter alia, reproduce a work, issue copies of the work to … HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT% 09.03.2026OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.Facilitative Index S. Particulars Pg. No. No.1. Introduction 3Signed By:ANUBHAV RFA(OS)(COMM) 18/2024 and other connected matter Page 1 of 97 2. Factual Background 5 3. Proceedings Before

Smithkline Beecham Plc and Another Vs. Mr. Sunil Singhi and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 7, Rule 10 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 3 & 4; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62(2); Copyright Act, 1956; Marks Act - Sections 55(1);

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)849; 91(2001)DLT461; 2001(2)RAJ446

entertained and tried in Delhi or any other Court in India. He argued that Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') did not permit the dispute to be adjudicated in Delhi especially since … of the plaintiff. On 7.9.1999 the following ex parte ad interim orders were granted: 'I.A. No. 8797/99Notice for 31st January, 2000. The plaint and this application discloses that the Plaintiff is the registered owner of the mark

Time Warner Entertainment Company I.P. and ors. Vs. Rpg Netcom Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13(1) and 14; Cable Television Networks (Regulations) Act, 1995 - Sections 2 and 21; Cable Television Network Rules, 1994 - Rule 6(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 1; International Copyright Order, 1991; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 134(4)

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ499; 2008(37)PTC21(Del)

included in the First schedule of the International Copyright Order, 1991, read with the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), they have exclusive claims to the rights mentioned in Section 14 of

Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. Vs. Debashis Patnaik and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33 and 33(3); Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 33(3); Evidence Act - Sections 12

Reported in : LC2007(1)323; 2007(34)PTC201(Del)

under the Companies Act, 1956. It is also registered as a Copyright Society under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957. On allegations that the defendants have committed flagrant violation of the rights of the plaintiff in the works … guarantee and registered under the Companies Act, 1956. It is also registered as a Copyright Society under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957. On allegations that the defendants have committed flagrant violation of the rights of

Super Cassette Industries Limited Vs. Bathla Cassette Industries Pvt. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 8; Copyright Act, 1957; Copyright Act, 1958 - Sections 10(3), 13(3), 52, 52(1) and 60; Copyright Rules, 1958 - Rule 21 and 21(2)

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)572; 107(2003)DLT91; 2003(27)PTC280(Del); 2004(1)RAJ69

itself having admitted that their production was covered under the statutory defenses enlisted in Section 52 of the Copyright Act 1957, the same cannot be the subject matter of protection under the provisions of the Copyright Act as the … an owner of the original work but nevertheless to avoid any petty disputes the payment was being made. 3. On the other hand, the plaintiffs' case is that in re-recording the song in question the plaintiffs had

The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford Vs. Na ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 52 and 52(1); Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 2008(106)DRJ482; LC2008(3)402; 2008(38)PTC385(Del)

examination. All this, the plaintiffs claim, make each textbook an original literary work within the meaning of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereafter 'the Act'). It is also averred that the author by a memorandum of Agreement has assigned to … of the University of Cambridge v. BD Bhandari , to assert that the defense of fair use under Section 52 cannot be extended to cases where there is verbatim copy of the questions and the answer key. … of IA No. 9823/2005, IA No. 647/2006, IA No.51/2006 preferred under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 and Order 39 Rule 4 of the Code

Vidya Prakashan Mandir Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Course Books Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 4, 7 and 8; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2 and 63

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2473; 2003CriLJ202; (2002)3UPLBEC2641

Sections 3, 4, 7 and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Course Books Act. 1978 and Section 63 of Copyright Act, 1957. 2. According to the allegations of the first information report the complainant had received information from the District

Super Cassette Industries Ltd. Vs. Entertainment Network (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 31(1), 31(2), 51 and 53; Medical Act, 1858 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi326; 112(2004)DLT549

songs produced and/or acquired by the appellant are sound recordings within the meaning of Section 2(xx) of the Copyright Act, 1957. It is alleged that the appellant being the owner of the copyright in the aforesaid sound recordings is … the direction of the Copyright Board directing the Registrar of Copyrights to grant a compulsory license under Section 31(1)(b) of the Copyrights Act, 1957. 2. It is alleged that the appellant is one of the leading music

Microfibres Inc. Vs. Girdhar and Co. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 6, 11, 13, 13(2), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16, 22, 40, 63, 67; Copyright Act, 1967 - Sections 15; Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11(2), 12 and 19(1); Design Act of 1911 - Sections 2(5); Patent and Designs Act; Patent Act; Trade Marks Act; U.K. Designs Act, 1949 - Sections 1(3); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 415, 420 and 479; New Design Rules, 2001; Copyright Law

Reported in : LC2009(2)229; 2009(40)PTC519(Del)

been made as at present. 19. The relevant statutory provisions are as follows: THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000 THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957 Section 2(d), The Designs Act, 2000 'design' means only the features of shape,configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines … 2. Since certain common issues arise in this appeal and the other two appeals i.e. FAO (OS) No. 326/2007 filed by Dart Industries Inc. and FAO (OS) No. 447/2008 filed by Mattel Inc., on the question of

Dhodha House Vs. S.K. Maingi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Secton 62, 62(1) and 62(2); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 5(3) and 105; Companies Act; Trade Marks Act - Sections 45 and 134(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 16 to 19 and 20 - Order 2, Rule 3 - Order 7, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR2006SC730; 2006(1)ALD138(SC); 2006(1)AWC864(SC); 2006(1)BLJR29; JT2006(1)SC123; (2006)1MLJ36(SC); 2006(32)PTC1(SC); RLW2006(1)SC543; (2006)9SCC41

of jurisdiction of a civil court to determine a lis as regard infringement of the provision of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short 'the 1957 Act') and the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (for short 'the 1958 Act') … Appellant's trade mark registration 'Dhodha House' under Registration No. 277714-B in class 30 under the 1958 Act, as also copyright registered under the 1957 Act … and try the present suit. Moreover, the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court is also attracted in view of Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act.'9. The value of the suit for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction