Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: copyright act 1957 section 2 · Page 1 of about 1,355 results (0.040 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 16 1968

J.N. Bagga and ors. Vs. All India Reporter Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-16-1968

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5(2) and 177; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62, 69 and 69(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1969Bom302; (1969)71BOMLR409; 1969CriLJ1109; 1969MhLJ188

residents of Allahabad. The firm, which is required to be treated as Company for the purpose of the Copyright Act, 1957, has its registered office at Allahabad. The writing of the book and the publishing of it have taken … Copyright Act of 1911 deals with the provisions of Copyright in Section 1 and the infringement thereof in Section 2. Clause (a) of subsection (2) of Section 2 of the Copyright Act of 1911, lays down that 'Copyright

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2007

Microsoft Corporation Vs. Ms. K. Mayuri and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-30-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 7, 13(1), 14, 17, 40, 51 and 201; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13(1), 14, 40, 55 and 116(4); Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988 - Sections 96 and 97; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 135

Reported in : LC2007(3)27; 2007(35)PTC415(Del)

and marketed by the Plaintiff is a 'computer programme' within the meaning of Section 2 (ffc) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and included in the definition of a literary work as per Section 2(o) of the Act.6. I affirm

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 2008

Time Warner Entertainment Company I.P. and ors. Vs. Rpg Netcom Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-29-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13(1) and 14; Cable Television Networks (Regulations) Act, 1995 - Sections 2 and 21; Cable Television Network Rules, 1994 - Rule 6(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 1; International Copyright Order, 1991; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 134(4)

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ499; 2008(37)PTC21(Del)

included in the First schedule of the International Copyright Order, 1991, read with the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), they have exclusive claims to the rights mentioned in Section 14 of … control over their activities. 11. The Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 (hereafter 'the Cable Act'), provides, by Section 2(c) that ' cable television network' means any system consisting of a set of closed transmission paths and associated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 01 1998

Samsonite Corporation Vs. Vijay Sales

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-01-1998

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; Designs Act, 1911; Industrial Designs Act, R.S.C. 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT732

is a three dimensional representation, is an original artistic work within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The said artistic work is subject matter of copyright protection in India by virtue of India's membership to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1977

Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. Vs. Eastern Indian Motion Picture ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-1977

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 19 and 33

Reported in : AIR1977SC1443; (1977)2SCC820; [1977]3SCR206

Jaswant Singh, J.133(1)Whether in view of the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, an existing and future right of music...composer, lyricist is capable of assignment and whether the producer of a … Indian Musical works in which copyright subsists in India. The incorporation of the IPRS was in terms of Section 2(r) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (Act 14 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') which was enacted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1992

Power Control and Appliances Co. and Another Vs. Sumeet Machines Pvt. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-1992

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -Order 14, Rule 8 - Order 19, Rule 3 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 79; Designs Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 12, 14, 16, 17, 22, 23, 51, 55. 81 and 96; Patents and Designs Act, 1911

Reported in : AIR1993Mad120

of the Trade and Merchandize Marks Act 1958 as well as the definition under Section 2 of the Copyright Act 1957, and Section 12 sub-clauses 13, 28, 29, 34, 77 to 79, Sections 81 and 96 of the Trade

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2004

Super Cassette Industries Ltd. Vs. Entertainment Network (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-30-2004

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 31(1), 31(2), 51 and 53; Medical Act, 1858 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi326; 112(2004)DLT549

songs produced and/or acquired by the appellant are sound recordings within the meaning of Section 2(xx) of the Copyright Act, 1957. It is alleged that the appellant being the owner of the copyright in the aforesaid sound recordings is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2009

Microfibres Inc. Vs. Girdhar and Co. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2009

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 6, 11, 13, 13(2), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16, 22, 40, 63, 67; Copyright Act, 1967 - Sections 15; Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11(2), 12 and 19(1); Design Act of 1911 - Sections 2(5); Patent and Designs Act; Patent Act; Trade Marks Act; U.K. Designs Act, 1949 - Sections 1(3); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 415, 420 and 479; New Design Rules, 2001; Copyright Law

Reported in : LC2009(2)229; 2009(40)PTC519(Del)

been made as at present. 19. The relevant statutory provisions are as follows: THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000 THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957 Section 2(d), The Designs Act, 2000 'design' means only the features of shape,configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2008

Rajesh Masrani Vs. Tahiliani Design Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-28-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 17 and 44; Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(1)(5); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Registration Act - Sections 48; Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 49; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2009Delhi44; 2009BusLR280(Del); LC2009(1)252

course of developing the garments and accessories by the plaintiff are artistic works under Section 2(c)(i) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The patterns printed or embroidered on the fabric are also artistic works in their own right and are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1972

Satsang and anr. Vs. Kiron Chandra Mukhopadhyay and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-18-1972

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13(1), 14(1) and 45

Reported in : AIR1972Cal533

made by the Society founded by him 'literary works' within the meaning of the word 'work' under the Copyright Act, 1957 ?The religious preacher in this case is Anukul Chandra Chakrabartty known by his followers end disciples as 'Sri … 1 and 2 Kiron Chandra Mukhopadhaya and Kumud Bandhu Bal submitted that these works do not come within Section 13 of the Copyright Act. According to him these works are not original literary works. He submitted that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial