Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: copyright act 1957 section 13 · Page 1 of about 1,085 results (0.039 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 20 2007

Yonex Kabushiki Kaisha Vs. Phillips International and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-20-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13 and 40; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 27, 27(2), 28, 28(3), 30(1) and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : LC2007(3)228; 2007(35)PTC345(Del)

the Universal Copyright Convention, the plaintiff's works are protected in India by virtue of Section 40 of the Copyright Act 1957, read in conjunction with the International Copyright Order 1999.5. It is further submitted that the plaintiff is also … the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act and thereforee is subject matter of copyright protection under Section 13 of the Copyright Act. The label has been created for the plaintiff by its employees, in the course

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2007

Dart Industries Inc. and anr. Vs. Techno Plast and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-04-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11, 18, 19, 20, 22, 22(2)(3), 22(3) and 29; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 15, 17, 45, 51, 53 and 55; Designs Rules, 2001; Designs Act, 1911; Patent Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2007(35)PTC285(Del)

injunction against the defendants under Section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000 read with Section 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The plaintiff No. 1 is a company incorporated under the laws of Delaware, USA. The plaintiff No. 2 … of the copyright in the said artistic work. The plaintiffs claim that in view of the provisions of Section 13 and 14 of the Copyright Act, they are entitled to bundle of exclusive right including the the right

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2007

Microsoft Corporation Vs. Ms. K. Mayuri and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-30-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 7, 13(1), 14, 17, 40, 51 and 201; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13(1), 14, 40, 55 and 116(4); Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988 - Sections 96 and 97; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 135

Reported in : LC2007(3)27; 2007(35)PTC415(Del)

and marketed by the Plaintiff is a 'computer programme' within the meaning of Section 2 (ffc) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and included in the definition of a literary work as per Section 2(o) of the Act.6. I affirm … as the supplementary User Instructions and Manuals, are 'original literary works' as contemplated under Section 2(o) and Section 13(1)(a) of the Act. The plaintiff is the owner of the said copyright. A complete list of the software

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 07 2007

Microsoft Corporation Vs. Mr. Kiran and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-07-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 7, 13(1), 14, 17, 40, 51(1), 115(4) and 201; Lanham Act; International Copyright Order, 1999

Reported in : LC2007(3)214; 2007(35)PTC748(Del)

software developed and marketed by the plaintiff is 'computer programme' within the meaning of Section 2(ffc) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (herein after referred to as the said Act) and included in the definition of a literary work as … as the supplementary User Instructions and Manuals, are 'original literary works' as contemplated under Section 2(o) and Section 13(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The plaintiff is the owner of the said copyrights. The rights of authors

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2006

Saranya Zaveri and anr. Vs. Kamadon Academy P. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-01-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 134, 134(1) and 134(2); Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 40, 55, 62, 62(1) and 62(2); Kerala Stamp Act - Sections 33; Corporations Act, 2001 - Sections 45A, 114, and 127(1); Evidence Act - Sections 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 15 to 20, 21, 26, 43, 115 and 151 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order 7, Rule 1, 8, 10, 11 - Order 8, Rule 3 - Order 43, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [2006]133CompCas546(Ker); 2008(38)PTC554(Ker)

1, Civil Procedure Code and Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957, is for a declaration that the plaintiff is the exclusive owner and proprietor of the marks Kamadon and … that he first published the work in Australia. This is the minimum that is to be pleaded under Section 13 of the Copyright Act. From a reading of the plaint it is not discernible as to which is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 2008

Time Warner Entertainment Company I.P. and ors. Vs. Rpg Netcom Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-29-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsMedia and Communication

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 13(1) and 14; Cable Television Networks (Regulations) Act, 1995 - Sections 2 and 21; Cable Television Network Rules, 1994 - Rule 6(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 1; International Copyright Order, 1991; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 134(4)

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ499; 2008(37)PTC21(Del)

included in the First schedule of the International Copyright Order, 1991, read with the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), they have exclusive claims to the rights mentioned in Section 14 of … and also photocopies of certificates of the Censor Board in relation to some of the aforesaid films. 9. Section 13(1)(b) of the Copyright Act, 1957 provides that copyright subsists in cinematograph films. According to Section 14, 'copyright' means

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2007

Eastern Book Company and ors. Vs. D.B. Modak and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 14, 14(1), 16F, 16F(4), 17, 51, 52 and 52(1); Uttar Pradesh Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1975; Constitution of India - Articles 10, 15, 15(4), 16(4), 29, 226, 338(3), 340(1), 341 and 342; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Sections 2, 2(1) and 3(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 2 and 201; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Indian Soldiers (Litigation) Act, 1925; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147; Surtax Act, 1964 - Sections 8; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B, 11D, 11E, 12A, 12B, 12C and 12D; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1983; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1984; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994; Copyright Act, 1842

Reported in : AIR2008SC809; 2008(2)ALD1(SC); 2008(56)BLJR181; (2008)1CALLT69(SC); (2008)1CompLJ1(SC); 2008(1)JKJ41[SC]; LC2008(1)56; (2008)1MLJ361(SC); 2008(36)PTC1(SC); 2007(14)SCALE1; 2008AIRSCW49; AIR2008SC809; 2008(1)SCC1; 2008(1)LH(SC)179; 2008(2)ICC206; 2008(4)KCCRSN237

it constitutes an `original literary work  of the appellants in which copyright subsists under Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as  the Act ) and thus the appellants alone have the exclusive right to make

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2007

The Academy of General Education Represented by the Registrar Sri K.K. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-05-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 40 and 41; Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 4

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1074; LC2008(1)373; ILR2008(1)Kar1075; 2008(1)KCCRSN82; 2008(2)AIRKarR517; AIR2008NOC1286; 2008AIHC2063(Kar)

to the definitions of the expressions 'literary work', 'dramatic work' and also to the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957.48. Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957 ('the Act' in short) in the heart and soul of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1966

Agarwala Publishing House Vs. Board of High School and Intermediate Ed ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-19-1966

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 15; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 17 and 18

Reported in : AIR1967All91

musical or artistic works', and therefore do not come within the purview of Section 13 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957. 3. Even if there is any copyright in such a question paper, it belongs to the author (i.e.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2006

Microsoft Corporation Vs. Deepak Raval

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-16-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1959 - Sections 2; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 7, 13(1), 14, 17, 40, 51, 51(1), 58, 116(4) and 201; International Copyright Order, 1999

Reported in : LC2007(1)72

User Instructions and Manuals, are 'original literary works' as contemplated under Section 2(o) and Section 13(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The plaintiff is the owner of the said copyright. A complete list of the software programme owned by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial