Advanced Search Results

Power Control and Appliances Co. and Another Vs. Sumeet Machines Pvt. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -Order 14, Rule 8 - Order 19, Rule 3 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 79; Designs Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 12, 14, 16, 17, 22, 23, 51, 55. 81 and 96; Patents and Designs Act, 1911

Reported in : AIR1993Mad120

of the Trade and Merchandize Marks Act 1958 as well as the definition under Section 2 of the Copyright Act 1957, and Section 12 sub-clauses 13, 28, 29, 34, 77 to 79, Sections 81 and 96 of the Trade

Anwar Mohammad Khan Son of Sri Niyamatullah Khan Vs. Sri Taj Mohammad ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 11, 12, 19, 27, 28, 29, 31, 71, 78, 79, 105, 106 and 159; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 63; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 485, 486 and 487; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 27, 27(1), 27(2), 124, 124(5), 134, 134(1), 135 and 135(2); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 36 to 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 22(1)

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2166

registered at number 611689 (subsequently corrected as 611389) under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and the Copyright Act, 1957 and the plaintiff No. 1- respondent Taj Mohammad Khan assigned the said trade mark and Copyright 'Ped Chhap … the artistic work, lettering and colouring etc in the registered trade mark and has committed offences punishable under Section 78 and 79 of the Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act No. … that their trademark was registered under the Trade Mark Act bearing number 1255208 but when the appellant-defendant controverted this assertion then the plaintiff-respondents with permission

Ani Technologies Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Intellectual Property

is owned by the 2nd respondent without purchasing such copyright registered a complaint on 13-05-2017 alleging infringement of Copyright Act, 1957 (‘the Act’ for short). On registration of the said complaint before the Additional Commissioner of Police, investigation is … is cognizable, the case shall be deemed to be a cognizable case, 12 notwithstanding that the other offences are non- cognizable.” (emphasis supplied) In terms … be conducted and an FIR came to be registered in Crime No.191 of 2017 alleging offences punishable under Sections 63 and 64 of the Act. At that juncture, the petitioners, the Company and the Directors of Ola

Tata Consultancy Services Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2; Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Copyright Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Article 366 and 366(12); Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; Madhya Pradesh Upkar Adhiniyam, 1981; Madhya Pradesh Upkar (Sanshodhan) Adhyadesh, 2001; Customs Act - Sections 2(22), 12 and 14; Customs Valuation Rules, 1988; Customs Tariff Act, 1997; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1999; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 4(4); Sales of Goods Act, 1923; Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act, 1979 - Sections 61; Supply of Goods and Services Act, 1982 - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR2005SC371; (2004)192CTR(SC)257; 2004(178)ELT22(SC); [2004]271ITR401(SC); 2006(33)PTC652(SC); 2004(9)SCALE349; (2005)1SCC308; [2004]137STC620(SC)

Sorabjee also drew the attention of the Court to the definitions of 'Computer' and 'Computer Programme' in The Copyright Act, 1957. These read as follows:'Computer' includes any electronic or similar device having information processing capabilities'.'Computer programme' means a set … been specified therein, any other kind of moveable property constituted goods. This Court held as follows:'27. According to Section 12 of the Customs Act, duty is payable on goods imported into India. The word 'goods' has been defined

The Academy of General Education Represented by the Registrar Sri K.K. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1), 40 and 41; Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 4

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1074; LC2008(1)373; ILR2008(1)Kar1075; 2008(1)KCCRSN82; 2008(2)AIRKarR517; AIR2008NOC1286; 2008AIHC2063(Kar)

to the definitions of the expressions 'literary work', 'dramatic work' and also to the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957.48. Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957 ('the Act' in short) in the heart and soul of the … Karanth and that she only received as a residuary legatee what was mentioned by Dr. Karanth in para 12 of his will.27. Learned Counsel Sri. T.N. Raghupathy also placed reliance on the decisions referred to by the

Cryogas Equipment Private Limited versus Inox India Limited and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 4 S.C.R. 765

and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; English Registered Designs Act, 1949; Penal Code, 1860.List of Keywords Section 15(2) of Copyright Act, 1957; Section 2(d) of Design Act, 2000; Design; Rejection of plaint; Order VII, Rule 11; Copyright protection; Artistic work; Shape; … the copyright owner or any authorised licensee. Specifically, it contested Inox’s claim of generating revenue amounting to Rupees 122 crores, arguing that such proceeds could only have been realised through the sale of Cryogenic Semi-trailers manufactured by

Vishvajeet Sharma and anr. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 15, 15(2) and 63; Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 2(1); Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 27, 103 and 104; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3) and 482; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC484(Del)

also denied that the product of Respondent No. 2 was an original work of art protected under the Copyright Act 1957.5. It appears that even before the second notice dated 14th December 2005 was sent by the lawyers of … S. Muralidhar, J.1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ('CrPC.') seeks the quashing of the Complaint No. 55/1/ 2005 … v. Darshan Singh and Ors.) and FIR No. 52 of 2006 dated 12th January 2006 registered at Police Station (PS) Saraswati Vihar under Section 63

Mundipharma Ag Vs. Wockhardt Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961; Copyright Act, 1957; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27

Reported in : ILR1991Delhi606

who was the owner of the copyrights in question. If reference is made to Chapter Xii of the Copyright Act, 1957 relating to civil remedies in case of infringement of copyright; every suit or other civil proceedings arising under … D.P. Wadhwa, J.(1) In this petition filed under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (for short 'the Act') I am to decide by this order an … of PVP-I. The petitioner, thereforee, drew attention of the respondent to clause 12(a) of the agreement that any purchase of PVP-I from any other party

Amar Nath Chakroborty Vs. Dutta Bucket Industries and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 12. 21, 23(2), 30(1), 31(1) and 115 - Rule 65(1); ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules, 1959; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 2

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN278,2005(31)PTC415(Cal)

the business of the appellant. (i) To protect the artistic work, as defined in Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957, the appellant applied for and duly obtained the registration of the label TAJ as a piece of artistic … the registration of 'MAJ' label Trade Mark within the statutory period and as such, the defendant never violated Section 12 of the said Act.5) The suit as well as injunction petition should be stayed according to Section 115

Orchid Healthcare a Division of Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals L ...

Court : Patna

Subject : CivilIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Mark Act, 1958 - Sections 12(3), 18(1) and 29(2); ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act; ;Trade Mark Act; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 55; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 18 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 27 - Order 43, Rule 1; ;Trade Mark Rules - Rule 44

Reported in : AIR2010Pat46,2010(58)BLJR231,LC2010(1)14

Code of Civil Procedure in a case under Section 29(2) of the Act and Section 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and held as follows: (SCC pp. 731-32 & 733, paras 9 & 14)9 Usually, the prayer for grant … consumers, the plaintiff served a legal notice to the said defendant No. 1 at its Chennai address on 12.7.2001, but the same was ignored and by letter dated 13.8.2001, defendant No. 1 asked for irrelevant particulars about