Advanced Search Results

J.N. Bagga and ors. Vs. All India Reporter Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5(2) and 177; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62, 69 and 69(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1969Bom302; (1969)71BOMLR409; 1969CriLJ1109; 1969MhLJ188

residents of Allahabad. The firm, which is required to be treated as Company for the purpose of the Copyright Act, 1957, has its registered office at Allahabad. The writing of the book and the publishing of it have taken … copyright by 'offer for sale'. The English Copyright Act of 1911 deals with the provisions of Copyright in Section 1 and the infringement thereof in Section 2. Clause (a) of subsection (2) of Section 2 of the Copyright

Super Cassette Industries Ltd. Vs. Entertainment Network (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 31(1), 31(2), 51 and 53; Medical Act, 1858 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi326; 112(2004)DLT549

songs produced and/or acquired by the appellant are sound recordings within the meaning of Section 2(xx) of the Copyright Act, 1957. It is alleged that the appellant being the owner of the copyright in the aforesaid sound recordings is … Dalveer Bhandari, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 20th October, 2003 passed by the Copyright Board at New

Fortune Films International Vs. Dev Anand and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 13(4), 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 30, 55 and 55(1); Copyright Act, 1911 - Sections 35; Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 48(1); Constitution of India - Article 133(1)

Reported in : AIR1979Bom17; (1978)80BOMLR263

the motion picture would belong to the producers. (3) [t was submitted that under the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, the copyright in a cine artiste's performance was not any 'work' which was protected and, therefore, despite the … 'work' as therein defined and if the works indicated in the definition of 'work' to be found in Section 2(y) of the Copyright Act properly considered, only 'work' which is tangible in nature was protected. It was … This appeal is from the order of Gadgil J. dated 3rd January 1978 made on the plaintiff's Notice of Motion, dated 15th December 1977. By

Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Mr. Gajendra Singh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 17 and 55(1); Factories Act; Copyright Act, 1914 - Sections 5; Copyright Act, 1911; Workmen's Compensation Act; Evidence Act - Sections 40 to 42 and 43; Dramatic Copyright Act, 1833

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR532; 2007(6)BomCR700; (2007)109BOMLR2072; 2008BusLR161(Bom); LC2007(3)299; 2008(36)PTC53(Bom)

prepared by Defendant No. 1 under a contract of service with the Plaintiff. This is in view of Section 17(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957, which reads as under:17. First owner of copyright Subject to the provisions … departure from the traditional Antakshari game; the concept note is a literary work within the meaning of the Copyright Act, 1957 and the Plaintiff had and has the exclusive right to reproduce the same and to issue copies of

Super Cassetts Industries Ltd. Vs. Music Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 31(1)(b), 19-A, 52(1)(j)(4); Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 1985 - Section 41(1); Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 151; Trade Marks Act - Section 25(i); Indian Copyright Act, 1914 - Section 72; Copyright Act, 1911 - Section 4; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Section 22(1), 19(1)(6); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973, - Sections 345, 346 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193, 228, 125

in these appeals is whether on a complaint made to the Copyright Board under Section 31 of the Copyright Act, 1957, the said Board under Clause (b) of Sub-Section (1) can pass an interim order in the pending complaint.

Smithkline Beecham Plc and Another Vs. Mr. Sunil Singhi and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 7, Rule 10 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 3 & 4; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62(2); Copyright Act, 1956; Marks Act - Sections 55(1);

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)849; 91(2001)DLT461; 2001(2)RAJ446

entertained and tried in Delhi or any other Court in India. He argued that Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') did not permit the dispute to be adjudicated in Delhi especially since … It has been registered in Class 5 of the Fourth Schedule to the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Marks Act) with effect from 21.10.1982 in favor of the plaintiff. On 7.9.1999

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Dalia and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33, 62, 62(2) and 62(2)(1); Companies Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4, 20 and 202

Reported in : LC2007(3)204

Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit by virtue of Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 as the plaintiff 'carries on business' through its branch office situated at B-317, Som Dutt Chamber-1, Bhikaji Cama

Agarwala Publishing House Vs. Board of High School and Intermediate Ed ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 15; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 17 and 18

Reported in : AIR1967All91

musical or artistic works', and therefore do not come within the purview of Section 13 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957. 3. Even if there is any copyright in such a question paper, it belongs to the author (i.e. … of High School and Intermediate Examination, U. P., introduced by a Gazette notification dated 9-6-1959 issued under Section 15 of the Intermediate Education Act, declaring that copyright of the question papers set at examinations conducted by the

Samsonite Corporation Vs. Vijay Sales

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; Designs Act, 1911; Industrial Designs Act, R.S.C. 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 73(1998)DLT732

is a three dimensional representation, is an original artistic work within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The said artistic work is subject matter of copyright protection in India by virtue of India's membership to … substance a mere mechanical device, and does not include any trade mark as defined in clause (v) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (43 of 1958), or property mark as

Rajesh Masrani Vs. Tahiliani Design Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 17 and 44; Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(1)(5); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Registration Act - Sections 48; Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 49; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2009Delhi44; 2009BusLR280(Del); LC2009(1)252

course of developing the garments and accessories by the plaintiff are artistic works under Section 2(c)(i) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The patterns printed or embroidered on the fabric are also artistic works in their own right and are … Manmohan Singh, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC against the order dated 16th July, 2008 passed by the learned Single Judge of this court allowing